idle problems
idle problems
my 1986 IROC loves to idle very high (around 1000-1200) most of the time...
i've tried all the idle controls and nothing will set it lower. gimme some suggestions.
------------------
there's no replacement for displacement
i've tried all the idle controls and nothing will set it lower. gimme some suggestions.
------------------
there's no replacement for displacement
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: 2001 Camaro SS
Engine: Almighty LS1
Transmission: T56
1000-1200 is normal idle when its not in gear ... as far as I know anyway 
idle is much easier to work with on a carb most times (I forgot how to do it on one of them friggen TPI whatsits
)

idle is much easier to work with on a carb most times (I forgot how to do it on one of them friggen TPI whatsits
) the thing is though, when i put it in to gear, it slams down the tranny cause it revs so high, and its not the tranny mounts cause they are fine...
------------------
there's no replacement for displacement
------------------
there's no replacement for displacement
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
Have you tried adjusting the Idle Air Control (IAC) valve (I'm assuming you have TPI?) If not, there is a tech article on how to do this in the tech section. I had a problem with my '85 Z28 idling too slow and dying at stops or when shifted into reverse. An IAC adjustment fixed the problem.
A vacume (I can't spell
) leak could also cause higher than normal revving. I could make my '85 do this by disconnecting the PCV valve from the hose connected to the intake manifold.
------------------
'91 Camaro RS
Bin Laden can have my Camaro when he prys it from my cold, lifeless hands!
[This message has been edited by RSFreak (edited December 11, 2001).]
A vacume (I can't spell
) leak could also cause higher than normal revving. I could make my '85 do this by disconnecting the PCV valve from the hose connected to the intake manifold.------------------
'91 Camaro RS
Bin Laden can have my Camaro when he prys it from my cold, lifeless hands!
[This message has been edited by RSFreak (edited December 11, 2001).]
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: 2001 Camaro SS
Engine: Almighty LS1
Transmission: T56
tranny mounts can look fine until you replace them... unless you've actually dropped the tranny to look, you can't be 100% sure...
if Amorget was still posting he'd tell you about his experience
if Amorget was still posting he'd tell you about his experience
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by RSFreak:
A vacume (I can't spell
) leak could also cause higher than normal revving. I could make my '85 do this by disconnecting the PCV valve from the hose connected to the intake manifold.</font>
A vacume (I can't spell
) leak could also cause higher than normal revving. I could make my '85 do this by disconnecting the PCV valve from the hose connected to the intake manifold.</font>
Another problem could by your CTS (Coolant Temperature Sensor). If it is not working properly it could be telling the ECM your engine coolant is cooler than it really is and cause the ECM to think it is in "Start Up" mode.
Lastly, a bad MAP sensor (if you have SD TPI or TBI) can also cause havoc with your idle.
But I need more information about your engine and year of car to offer any more advice.
Trending Topics
well..... its a 86' IROC 305 TPI. i replaced the mounts and that did nothing at all. im gonna get a can a carb cleaner and spray around the engine bay looking for leaks and changes in idle. its a cheaper wway to start then replaceing sensors.
------------------
there's no replacement for displacement
1986 IROC 5.OL auto w/posi
------------------
there's no replacement for displacement
1986 IROC 5.OL auto w/posi
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Vikingbrew:
well..... its a 86' IROC 305 TPI. i replaced the mounts and that did nothing at all. im gonna get a can a carb cleaner and spray around the engine bay looking for leaks and changes in idle. its a cheaper wway to start then replaceing sensors.
</font>
well..... its a 86' IROC 305 TPI. i replaced the mounts and that did nothing at all. im gonna get a can a carb cleaner and spray around the engine bay looking for leaks and changes in idle. its a cheaper wway to start then replaceing sensors.
</font>
Vacuum leak is my first hunch. I wouldn't go replacing sensors until you have someone put a scan tool on it - to read whatever codes the ECM is throwing and to see how the readings of the sensors. Codes by themselves (without sensor readings) can be misleading. Often a "flaky" sensor may not actually show a "failure" but cause other sensors (while the ECM goes into "Safe Mode") with show a "failure" in reaction to the ECM trying to keep the engine running.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 4
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Vikingbrew:
it reads codes 42 and 54. ive heard 54 can be alot of things.
</font>
it reads codes 42 and 54. ive heard 54 can be alot of things.
</font>
Both (fuel pump and ignition module) are common problems.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




