Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

do you HAVE TO run alky/water injection?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 04:46 PM
  #1  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
do you HAVE TO run alky/water injection?

How does one know when it is needed. Is it merely a stopgap measure? Is it for when you cannot run high octane fuel or have too much compression, improper quench etc?

Am I misunderstanding why people are running it? Does it add a mass of power? Will I have to run it?

Last edited by B4Ctom1; Sep 22, 2003 at 04:49 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 11:10 PM
  #2  
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
From: chi-town
its a bandaid to run more boost and/or more timing instead of race gas

So in essence once you reach the "knock" point of your motor....if you would install a water/alcohol injection system you could add more boost/timing
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 11:21 PM
  #3  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
thank you, curiousitygot the best of me.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 10:06 AM
  #4  
Willie's Avatar
TGO Supporter
25 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 5
From: Tucson, Arizona USA
Car: 1987 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
http://www.teknett.com/pwp/drmayf/injchem.htm
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #5  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
thanks for that article willie but it reads like "if you dont use water injection you will blow your $hit up" it has no regards for fuel quality or other forms of intercooling.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 03:49 AM
  #6  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
It’s not exactly a bandaid. The reason that BSFC goes up on boosted engines is that the additional fuel is being used to cool the chamber and also in some ways accelerate the combustion to prevent detonation. You can create exactly the same effect by replacing the fuel with water (actually, water is better at both controlling detonation and an equal mass will have result in almost 2x the cooling).

In other words, it works better then fuel for what the engine needs, but if the engine can’t get water then fuel can be used as a bandaid
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 09:07 AM
  #7  
rooster433's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
I don't have any hard core results with mine but i'll tell you its pretty much the only time is spins the living crap out of the tires over 45mph...

I run the same fuel and spark, i'm sure i could pull a little fuel or spark but for a daily driven car i'm not going to run on any edges.

think about it... that blower i'm using has a Delta T of 160 degrees at 10psi, with no intercooler.

I know my IAT sensor (its before the blower on my car) goes from 110 to ambient in a few seconds flat... you know at temps WAY hotter than ambient its really pulling the temperature down.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #8  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
so why the basically do some really fast cars run it and some really fast cars dont?
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 08:10 PM
  #9  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
It’s illegal in a lot of race classes because a lot of people have a tendency to run methanol (or other alcohol) in the water in with the mistaken belief that it will add performance. The reason it’s illegal is that in many classes you have to run ‘gas’ as fuel, and alcohol is illegal.

Without it you run some combination of more fuel, less timing, less boost, less compression…
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #10  
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
From: chi-town
i dont agree....its still a bandaid

It does work, i'm not denying that and its a great tool to use but in the end, its a bandaid.

its just one more thing to fail when you really dont want it too.....imagine:

93octane
10psi
no detonation

11psi creates detonation....so you add a water/alchy system and now you can run up to 15psi and you do. What happens when it runs out? the pump fails? etc

BOOM

That is at least my main reason why i wont run one on a built motor, if it is something you really dont care about. Have at it
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 09:18 AM
  #11  
rooster433's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 89ProchargedROC
i dont agree....its still a bandaid

It does work, i'm not denying that and its a great tool to use but in the end, its a bandaid.

its just one more thing to fail when you really dont want it too.....imagine:

93octane
10psi
no detonation

11psi creates detonation....so you add a water/alchy system and now you can run up to 15psi and you do. What happens when it runs out? the pump fails? etc

BOOM

That is at least my main reason why i wont run one on a built motor, if it is something you really dont care about. Have at it

yeah but imagine this..

93 octane,
10psi
no detonation
175 Intake charge


$300 water injection kit (for a nice one) and you have

93 octane
10 psi
no detonation
maybe a 110-120 intake charge
and even further from detonation.

Anthor misconseption is it will be hard to keep full.. I filled my washer resevior 1 time with the winter blend of washerfluid $1.30 (just some weak methonal/water mix) and i've probally used a quart in 3 weeks time...

I wouldn't imageing ever being able to go threw a gallon in a night.... hardly even a week of good driving.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2003 | 09:19 AM
  #12  
rooster433's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
the thing i really don't understand is the alcohol... i guess its just a bandaid for fuel... It tried it in my system last time and got no different results.

I think for removeing heat, straight water is best.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2003 | 03:00 AM
  #13  
89ProchargedROC's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
From: chi-town
i am not denying that it can really help lower the IATs but i still feel its a bandaid

thats my opinion and i'm sticking to it
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #14  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
why didnt porshe's and skylines, and the likes come with it?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2003 | 12:27 PM
  #15  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
why didnt porshe's and skylines, and the likes come with it?

1. most owners dont check their oil.. nevermind their water level

2. most factory cars have to be overbuilt toward the safe/reliable side. they arnt race cars. therefore, it isnt needed... it could be added, but see #1
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2003 | 11:42 PM
  #16  
rooster433's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
and why didn't my car come with a turbo?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2003 | 12:02 AM
  #17  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by rooster433
and why didn't my car come with a turbo?

i think it was a dealer only option... geeze, if the factory gave us everything, what would we do in our free time?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2003 | 02:34 AM
  #18  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by MrDude_1
1. most owners dont check their oil.. nevermind their water level

2. most factory cars have to be overbuilt toward the safe/reliable side. they arnt race cars. therefore, it isnt needed... it could be added, but see #1
Exactly. People are dumb. Even most car guys are too dumb to do the right thing if a car requires any kind of different, regular care.

FWIW, it’s been considered… the one example at the tip of my tonge (finger?) is the GN/T-type. They’ve even got the light installed in the dash for it.

Originally posted by rooster433
the thing i really don't understand is the alcohol... i guess its just a bandaid for fuel... It tried it in my system last time and got no different results.

I think for removeing heat, straight water is best.
Only 2 reasons: If you live someplace cold it will keep the water in the tank from freezing, and if your fuel system can’t deliver enough fuel

Originally posted by 89ProchargedROC
i am not denying that it can really help lower the IATs but i still feel its a bandaid

thats my opinion and i'm sticking to it
Lowering IATs is not the major reason that it works. AAMOF, to get the biggest decrease in IAT’s you’d want to mount the water nozzle as far forward in the intake track as possible, to get the most detonation control, you want to mount it as close to the cylinder as possible.

Given a specific set of parameters (fuel octane, manifold pressure…) if you want to design an engine to make the most power that it can you will be running water injection. Period. If you don’t like it and want to only go partway there… then fine. If you like wasting your money and adding extra fuel at >$1.60/gallon vs free to prevent detonation, great.

If you have no reason to run it at the ragged edge, then take your compression down half a point, or take your boost down a few PSI and run a ‘safe’ combination that you don’t have to worry about this stuff with. (or just buy a Hyundai).

If you want to get thrown for a loop and truly optimize the situation, with boost, build/use a good wet flow manifold and a TBI, and then install the water injectors where your port fuel injectors would be. You’ll use the fuel delivered by the TBI to cool the intake charge (and the intake charge to vaporize the fuel to give you much better vaporized fuel and efficiency then you’ll ever get from port injection) and get the maximum anti detonation effect from the water making the whole system happy. Of course, that would be insane… why would anybody do something like that
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2003 | 03:03 AM
  #19  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
ive never run it, or any kind of boost, but...


... i kinda look at it like nitrous... some people think its cheating, others just see it as a way to get more from the motor...

and for the most part, you arnt going to change peoples opinions on that... *shrug*


83 crossfire TA:
whats this about a stock lamp for it??? were they going to do it, and then back out? option?

also, ive been meaning to ask yuo for sometime now... are you silverback on some other boards?
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2003 | 03:32 AM
  #20  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by MrDude_1
ive never run it, or any kind of boost, but...

... i kinda look at it like nitrous... some people think its cheating, others just see it as a way to get more from the motor...

and for the most part, you arnt going to change peoples opinions on that... *shrug*
You’re right and wrong.

“cheating” is only defined within the context that you’re playing under…, if there is a rule that you can’t run N2O on the car, then you’re cheating if you do.

If there is a rule that you can’t run water injection on a car (there are, to prevent people from sneaking methanol, nitro…), you’re cheating if you do.

If there are no rules, but YOU don't want to deal with the extra hassle but someone else runs faster 'cause they will, well then you're just a sore looser

83 crossfire TA:
whats this about a stock lamp for it??? were they going to do it, and then back out? option?
They planned on running it, had an idiot light installed in the dash for it (I forgot exactly what it said, but it was something like “powerboost system”), but it never left the assembly line.

also, ive been meaning to ask yuo for sometime now... are you silverback on some other boards?
is it the fact that I can be a pompous ******* and it’s that obvious? Or is it the fact that my sig on 3rdgen.org lists 83 Crossfire TA as an AKA on other boards and lists? Or is it that I use the same avitar? (I originally drew that as a T-shirt design for another group that I’m involved with)
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2003 | 02:13 PM
  #21  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA

is it the fact that I can be a pompous ******* and it’s that obvious? Or is it the fact that my sig on 3rdgen.org lists 83 Crossfire TA as an AKA on other boards and lists? Or is it that I use the same avitar? (I originally drew that as a T-shirt design for another group that I’m involved with)

lol... a combination of pompous ******* and the avatar.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
midge54
LTX and LSX
21
Dec 27, 2019 04:14 PM
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
Dec 2, 2016 06:33 PM
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
15
Nov 10, 2015 06:17 AM
86Base
TPI
0
Aug 13, 2015 05:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.