Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

supercharging build question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2009 | 07:44 PM
  #1  
gwalker3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
supercharging build question

This is all hypothetical right now, seeing as I have yet to buy my Camaro, but some time between now and next summer I'm going to buy one that's 1983-1988, and eventually I will want to supercharge it.

My question concerns the power braking system. Does the brake booster run off manifold vacuum, and if it does can it be converted to a hydraulic system?

Thanks for your help.
Reply
Old May 23, 2009 | 08:54 PM
  #2  
TraviZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
Re: supercharging build question

yes its vacuum assist, and yes you can convert to hydraulic, I am running into vacuum issues and I am contemplating a electric vacuum pump, much cheaper and easier then a hydraulic conversion.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 12:54 AM
  #3  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

I know it depends on personal likes, but you'd have way more fun with a turbo, have more power, even get better gas mileage.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #4  
TraviZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
Re: supercharging build question

Oh gosh here we go. Don't take this thread off topic.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 08:05 PM
  #5  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by TraviZ
Oh gosh here we go. Don't take this thread off topic.
Um, alright?
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 11:26 PM
  #6  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

Your not off topic, part of the question is about supercharging. TraviZ has a Procharger and you like Turbos. That is the problem. Go Procharger, F3R139
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 04:50 AM
  #7  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by bvillercr
Your not off topic, part of the question is about supercharging. TraviZ has a Procharger and you like Turbos. That is the problem. Go Procharger, F3R139
Supposedly this is all hypothetical and he doesn't have even the car yet. I was just trying to point him in the right direction as far as forced induction goes, or just give him a view of more efficient ways. If he plans on using this car for daily, or frequent driving, a turbo is the way to go. Considering they have low and high boost settings, for when you don't need the power, and don't rob sometimes over 50 horsepower from the serpentine system.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 09:55 AM
  #8  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

For street applications the turbo is a better solution, but the Procharger sure does sound better.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #9  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by bvillercr
For street applications the turbo is a better solution, but the Procharger sure does sound better.
Sure it sounds better in writing, but in reality, a supercharger is an engine parasite. They're capable of producing huge amounts of power, but take into consideration the power being robbed at the serpentine system, requiring your engine to make an extra 50 or so horsepower that will never make it to the wheels, also think about shift lag. While a turbo will spin freely to keep full boost during a half second or less of shifting time, the supercharger is intantly slowed down.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 09:12 PM
  #10  
huffediroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: ontario
Car: 87 iroc
Engine: 350 with weiand 144
Transmission: tremec TKO 600,mcleod street twin
Axle/Gears: strange s60
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by -IrocZ-
Sure it sounds better in writing, but in reality, a supercharger is an engine parasite. They're capable of producing huge amounts of power, but take into consideration the power being robbed at the serpentine system, requiring your engine to make an extra 50 or so horsepower that will never make it to the wheels, also think about shift lag. While a turbo will spin freely to keep full boost during a half second or less of shifting time, the supercharger is intantly slowed down.
Superchargers are a parasite???? Thats the stupidest thing I ever heard! 50 horse to spin an extra pulley?? No way in hell!! Shift lag?? You gotta learn how to shift. How about turbo lag? Why do you think the top fuelers run blowers instead of turbos. Instant boost SEEEE YAAAAA!!!!
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #11  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by huffediroc
Superchargers are a parasite???? Thats the stupidest thing I ever heard! 50 horse to spin an extra pulley?? No way in hell!! Shift lag?? You gotta learn how to shift. How about turbo lag? Why do you think the top fuelers run blowers instead of turbos. Instant boost SEEEE YAAAAA!!!!
Lol, sorry but you haven't a clue what you're talking about. A supercharger IS an engine parasite, it takes power to make power. 50 horsepower to spin a pulley? No, but 50 horsepower to pressureize air to 8+ PSI and spin a compressor at 65,000+ RPM? Yes. Turbo lag is nonetheless an urban myth now ball bearing turbos have no lag if the engine is actually revving. Now you're going completely off topic, top fuel drag cars use blowers because they need the boost ABSOLUTELY as soon as they can get it, remember this is something where even a tenth of a second counts. Research them though, them blowers rob over 900 horsepower from the engine, and they're rebuilt after every run. Next time, stay on topic with something that'd refer to the subject at hand.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #12  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by huffediroc
Superchargers are a parasite???? Thats the stupidest thing I ever heard! 50 horse to spin an extra pulley?? No way in hell!! Shift lag?? You gotta learn how to shift. How about turbo lag? Why do you think the top fuelers run blowers instead of turbos. Instant boost SEEEE YAAAAA!!!!
Oh yeah pal, it's not a matter of learning how to shift, when you let off the gas to shift even for half a second, engine RPM's go down, everyone knows that. That reduction of RPM's is directly tied to the supercharger, therefore making you lose boost. While a turbo will spin freely for a short amount of time, keeping close to full boost.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 09:34 PM
  #13  
huffediroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: ontario
Car: 87 iroc
Engine: 350 with weiand 144
Transmission: tremec TKO 600,mcleod street twin
Axle/Gears: strange s60
Re: supercharging build question

Good points. Either way I'm sure he'd be happy with turbo or a blower. They're both tons of fun!
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 09:36 PM
  #14  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

That I'll agree on, superchargers are good on tracks, without shifting in the higher end, turbos are just better suited for top end cars. Guess they both have their strong points.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 10:42 PM
  #15  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

The centrifugal supercharger is directly tied to the crank, yes. But it is exponential as the RPM goes up. As far as shifts go every engine drops in RPM when you shift, I have no problem with my engine picking up and going. But then again I'm getting over 30lbs of boost, over 1900 ft lbs and over 2000 hps out of a Procharger on gas to the wheel.

Last edited by bvillercr; May 26, 2009 at 11:14 PM.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 10:33 PM
  #16  
huffediroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: ontario
Car: 87 iroc
Engine: 350 with weiand 144
Transmission: tremec TKO 600,mcleod street twin
Axle/Gears: strange s60
Re: supercharging build question

Any pics?
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 11:41 PM
  #17  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

Here you go. You might not like the engine it's a Hemi.

Name:  right2.jpg
Views: 47
Size:  269.3 KB
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 12:25 AM
  #18  
snowman383's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: central Louisiana
Car: 88 Firebird T-Top
Engine: 350 crate
Transmission: 700r4 w/shift kit
Axle/Gears: one's that move the car
Re: supercharging build question

you got a pic of the motor ..would love to see how it fits in there
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #19  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

This is an alston chasis, only the shell is stock. Here is a couple pictures with the front end off.

Name:  drive.jpg
Views: 57
Size:  91.9 KB

Name:  pass.jpg
Views: 80
Size:  90.2 KB

Name:  engine.jpg
Views: 64
Size:  129.7 KB
Reply
Old May 30, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #20  
huffediroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: ontario
Car: 87 iroc
Engine: 350 with weiand 144
Transmission: tremec TKO 600,mcleod street twin
Axle/Gears: strange s60
Re: supercharging build question

Holly @#$* that things nutty! What class do you run that in?
Reply
Old May 30, 2009 | 09:00 AM
  #21  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

It's a land speed car. A BG/ALT. Fastest camaro in the world 288mph.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #22  
Mark A 91Formula's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: Latham NY USA
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 3.23
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by bvillercr
It's a land speed car. A BG/ALT. Fastest camaro in the world 288mph.
LOL Yeah but what good if it doesn't have A/C........
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 05:12 PM
  #23  
TraviZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
Re: supercharging build question

roll down the window
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #24  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

At that speed the window are starting to open on their own.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #25  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

That's some good air conditioning, 288 mph winds.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 05:01 AM
  #26  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by bvillercr
The centrifugal supercharger is directly tied to the crank, yes. But it is exponential as the RPM goes up. As far as shifts go every engine drops in RPM when you shift, I have no problem with my engine picking up and going. But then again I'm getting over 30lbs of boost, over 1900 ft lbs and over 2000 hps out of a Procharger on gas to the wheel.
For some reason it doesn't seem like you're the real owner of this car, over 2,000 horsepower? You mean over 2,300 horsepower. Says that car is owned by John Laglo, and the Procharger website claims it only set a top speed of 269, not 288. My apologies if I'm incorrect, but it seems a little odd.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 09:26 AM
  #27  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

appology excepted for now. The spelling is wrong its Langlo, and the reason I put 2000 is because that is the only hard proof that I have will a dyno chart/video. After that video we went to FAST EFI and went from 28psi to 31 and from 6000rpm to 6800. This car has been 288 in 1994, since then our overdrive unit kept breaking, keeping us from achieving a second run, last year I went 269 and shut down early because of a blown intercooler. Any other questions?
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #28  
Shadow Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 2
From: Delaware
Car: Lots of 'em
Re: supercharging build question

That works for me. Lol.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #29  
bvillercr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Re: supercharging build question

Two dyno runs. First 2000(+) RWHP and me trying not to cuss on youtube, it was aroung 1 am. Second video with new FAST EFI putting out more HP but the car harmonics knocked the dyno sensor loose from the dyno with no data. The data that we did get was from our FAST system.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCxH3Ltv9o0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJApvHuDpL0
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #30  
crusinman2002's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Mukwonago, WI
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 for now
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stupid open diff. 2.73 i think
Re: supercharging build question

Originally Posted by gwalker3
This is all hypothetical right now, seeing as I have yet to buy my Camaro, but some time between now and next summer I'm going to buy one that's 1983-1988, and eventually I will want to supercharge it.

My question concerns the power braking system. Does the brake booster run off manifold vacuum, and if it does can it be converted to a hydraulic system?

Thanks for your help.

I think the best way of going is a Vacuum Canister. It holds and stores vacuum for when you need it. I used to run one on an old truck i had that had a huge cam in it. After i installed the vacuum canister i didn't have any more problems with my brakes.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

Or, you can just run a vacuum pump. I haven't used one, but they do work too.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku


and for a Hydraulic Booster

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #31  
90-irocdx3's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: santa barbara,ca
Car: 1990 iroc z
Engine: LSX 376 F1A
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.42
Re: supercharging build question

i saw it says j&s east valley garage is this car in santa barbara ca?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tricky1
Exhaust
4
Aug 23, 2015 01:17 PM
1985chevydude
Engine Swap
5
Aug 20, 2015 12:29 AM
jharrison5
Engine Swap
5
Aug 19, 2015 05:53 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
happyhapka
TPI
3
Aug 15, 2015 04:42 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 AM.