History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

I think I made a mistake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 09:35 PM
  #1  
3rdgenparts's Avatar
Thread Starter
On Probation
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 6
From: Dallas
Car: 1982 Trans Am KITT Replica
Engine: LU5 305 CROSSFIRE
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3:23
I think I made a mistake

So I just got done parting out a 91 GTA

And I found this in the trunk, Read the bottom left corner delivered/shipped to

In my defense car was REALLY beat up









Last edited by 3rdgenparts; Jul 29, 2017 at 11:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 09:59 PM
  #2  
StevenB L98/LS1's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 710
Likes: 32
From: pensacola florida
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: I think I made a mistake

I don't think you did, the car was worth more in parts than a whole, its not like there was anything special about it other than being a GTA, but its the most basic GTA you could get. A 2.73 drum rear end, LB9 Auto. Its nothing desirable worth restoring unless it was sentimental to the owner.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 10:19 PM
  #3  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Re: I think I made a mistake

No N10, no care.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 10:54 PM
  #4  
Eric-86sc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 412
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Car: 90 formula, 89 formula 350 vert
Engine: 305, 355
Transmission: T5, t56
Axle/Gears: 3:45 9 bolt, 8.8 3:73
Re: I think I made a mistake

Eh, I don't think finding a build sheet is a determining factory whether to part a car or not lol. I've got a bunch of them, they make nice wall art
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 11:16 PM
  #5  
3rdgenparts's Avatar
Thread Starter
On Probation
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 6
From: Dallas
Car: 1982 Trans Am KITT Replica
Engine: LU5 305 CROSSFIRE
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3:23
Re: I think I made a mistake

Did any of you read the entire build sheet??

I posted this on the historical forum for a reason


Dav​​​​​​e
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 11:19 PM
  #6  
tealman92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 998
Likes: 19
From: Ontario, California
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Re: I think I made a mistake

Post what your trying to refer to? What do you think was so special about the car that's in the build sheet
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 11:26 PM
  #7  
Eric-86sc's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 412
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Car: 90 formula, 89 formula 350 vert
Engine: 305, 355
Transmission: T5, t56
Axle/Gears: 3:45 9 bolt, 8.8 3:73
Re: I think I made a mistake

What, the FE2 code saying slp ? Not sure why it says that but FE2 is a standard rpo
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 11:28 PM
  #8  
3rdgenparts's Avatar
Thread Starter
On Probation
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 6
From: Dallas
Car: 1982 Trans Am KITT Replica
Engine: LU5 305 CROSSFIRE
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3:23
Re: I think I made a mistake

Originally Posted by tealman92
Post what your trying to refer to? What do you think was so special about the car that's in the build sheet
Lower left corner:

Shipped to

Charged to
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 11:30 PM
  #9  
3rdgenparts's Avatar
Thread Starter
On Probation
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 6
From: Dallas
Car: 1982 Trans Am KITT Replica
Engine: LU5 305 CROSSFIRE
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3:23
Re: I think I made a mistake

Originally Posted by 1989formulakid
I don't think you did, the car was worth more in parts than a whole, its not like there was anything special about it other than being a GTA, but its the most basic GTA you could get. A 2.73 drum rear end, LB9 Auto. Its nothing desirable worth restoring unless it was sentimental to the owner.

I agree but look at bottom left corner to who it was delivered to


Not many of us see or touch a GM "test car", Let alone a third gen


Dave
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2017 | 11:35 PM
  #10  
blacksunshine'91's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 195
From: Moorpark, CA
Car: '91 GTA, '92 T/A Convertible
Engine: GTA: 350 w/Vortec heads, T/A: 305
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Axle/Gears: GTA: 3.27, T/A: 2.73
Re: I think I made a mistake

My guess is that it was sent to Pontiac as a fleet car of some sort.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2017 | 12:41 AM
  #11  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,309
Likes: 1,064
From: Salina, KS
Re: I think I made a mistake

PEP cars are new cars that are driven by GM employees for a short period of time before they're sold as used. Not as much a test car as an employee perk or quality assurance.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2017 | 06:37 AM
  #12  
F-body-fan's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 948
Likes: 26
From: Green Bay, WI
Re: I think I made a mistake

I think that stuff is pretty cool.
Probably not restoring a worn out car for, but still really neat to see IMO

I have a 78 Trans am that was built in April of 78 & invoiced to the dealer in August.
It went MIA under GM's watch for 4 months. Guessing it went through the same type of deal.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2017 | 10:27 AM
  #13  
3rdgenparts's Avatar
Thread Starter
On Probation
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 6
From: Dallas
Car: 1982 Trans Am KITT Replica
Engine: LU5 305 CROSSFIRE
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3:23
Re: I think I made a mistake

Originally Posted by Drew
PEP cars are new cars that are driven by GM employees for a short period of time before they're sold as used. Not as much a test car as an employee perk or quality assurance.
I know PEP cars are nothing really special


Just what caught my eye was it was shipped to engineering dept ??


Pontiac Motor engine field fleet ??



Dave
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2017 | 05:10 PM
  #14  
DynoDave43's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 906
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: I think I made a mistake

Thanks for posting that 3rdgenparts.

Too bad that car couldn't be saved. As I understand it, there aren't too many 91/92 GTAs around.

I consider it's history interesting. I've spent a lot of years working in that area, and for GM. Unfortunately, I know little of Pontiac.

If you use Google Maps for that address, you will see that it is the location of Auburn Pontiac (a Pontiac Dealer). They closed when Pontiac was killed.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/50...!4d-83.2501816

I can't swear to know what year Auburn Pontiac opened for business, but I would say the building has a '70s/'80s vintage appearance. It's still there as a body shop, as you can see if you click on the image. It would be my guess that in '91, they would have been an active Pontiac dealer.

If a PEP vehicle, I would not expect it to be shipped to a Pontiac dealer address, but not in the dealers name. It strikes me as odd. I'm no expert, so I'll defer to someone here who has done more historical research on these things. But in my "Chevrolet" experience, the PEP (Product Evaluation Program) was handled by an outside vendor, providing vehicle prep and paperwork processing. They didn't use Metro Detroit dealers for that task that I knew of. I made a few trip to the lot of the company that did this work, picking up vehicles that were being purchased. I didn't know PEP vehicles were ever shipped to a dealer for processing. And if they were, I would expect the dealers name to appear in the lower left corner, along with their address.

Pontiac was a much smaller division than Chevrolet in '91, and the divisions still enjoyed a great deal of autonomy then. So it's entirely possible their process differed greatly from that of Chevrolet. But it still seems odd to have the Field Fleet name combined with Auburn Pontiac's address. Again, could just be they were the official processor for these back in the day.

Auburn did do a LOT of business (as many Metro Detroit dealers did, and still do) with employee ordered vehicles. This area in the '90s was a hotbed of truck engineering, testing, and manufacturing. As well as being one of the closer, if not the closest, Pontiac dealers to Pontiac headquarters.

Just interesting to me to see. I hope someone here with more knowledge of the Pontiac PEP program can chime in with some details.

I'm not saying it makes it rarer, or more valuable. But it is (to me anyway) and neat part of the cars history, and far from average.

Edit: Oh, and this all assumes that the "Engineering Field Fleet" is the same as a PEP vehicle. In my experience, PEP was PEP, and never went by another name. So again, kinda weird.

Last edited by DynoDave43; Jul 30, 2017 at 05:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2017 | 05:39 PM
  #15  
PurelyPMD's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 52
From: Newtown, CT
Car: 1987 IROC Original Owner
Engine: LB9
Transmission: M39 MM5
Axle/Gears: G80 G92 J65
Re: I think I made a mistake

The Zone 35 & Dealer 995 are what you need to look at.

I'm not sure what 995 is but 997 is the engineering department. The car could have gone to engine development as a long term test vehicle but that is just a guess.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2017 | 07:06 PM
  #16  
3rdgenparts's Avatar
Thread Starter
On Probation
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 6
From: Dallas
Car: 1982 Trans Am KITT Replica
Engine: LU5 305 CROSSFIRE
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3:23
Re: I think I made a mistake

Originally Posted by PurelyPMD
The Zone 35 & Dealer 995 are what you need to look at.

I'm not sure what 995 is but 997 is the engineering department. The car could have gone to engine development as a long term test vehicle but that is just a guess.


Hmmm......is it possible this car was pulled/ordered as a random QC car for testing ???

When I worked for Chevrolet last year and went to a conference, I talked with a plant worker from the Camaro flint factory and he said they randomly "pull" cars off the line for testing/QC purposes



IMO, The VIN # sequence isn't low enough for it to qualify as a PPV ???


Dave
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 AM.