Interesting day
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 1
From: was: Palmdale, Ca
Car: was: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: was: L69
Transmission: was: 700-R4
Interesting day
Well, I headed over to the junkyards with my Father. He needed parts for his Dodge, and since they always have a good selection of trucks ...
I decided to search for parts for my car as well. Go to the Primo area and found a ~1988 GTA with rear disc. Cool, I can score the brake lines.
Nope they are 12MM and I only have standard flare tools ( = stripped).
But I did find the aluminum driveshaft on the vehicle next to it. They wanted ~$35 for it.
I'd pay upto $20, but not $35. Checked the regular area, but nothing worth noting. Oh, except there was a 1986 (IIRC) Z28 with the entire TPI setup still on the car.
We also saw a ~1985 V6 Camaro with a 9-bolt posi disc rear end
(couldn't score the lines either). Well, since the day was lost, plus alot of people were there, we headed home.
I started tooling aroung with my Z28. Installed a fixed antenna that I got from the yards. Then found the torque arm and went to install it. Oh wait, I need the torque arm front mount, guess I'll use my A4's mount. Nope, wont bolt up! F%$K, got to get that from the yards as well.
Swapped the rear sway bar (23MM) from my drum 3.73 rear to the installed disc 3.73 (which was 21MM). Also found a vacuum dist so I am closer to turning this danged engine on.
Well, how was the softball game? Who won, the 4th genners?
I decided to search for parts for my car as well. Go to the Primo area and found a ~1988 GTA with rear disc. Cool, I can score the brake lines.
Nope they are 12MM and I only have standard flare tools ( = stripped).
But I did find the aluminum driveshaft on the vehicle next to it. They wanted ~$35 for it.
I'd pay upto $20, but not $35. Checked the regular area, but nothing worth noting. Oh, except there was a 1986 (IIRC) Z28 with the entire TPI setup still on the car.
We also saw a ~1985 V6 Camaro with a 9-bolt posi disc rear end
(couldn't score the lines either). Well, since the day was lost, plus alot of people were there, we headed home.I started tooling aroung with my Z28. Installed a fixed antenna that I got from the yards. Then found the torque arm and went to install it. Oh wait, I need the torque arm front mount, guess I'll use my A4's mount. Nope, wont bolt up! F%$K, got to get that from the yards as well.
Swapped the rear sway bar (23MM) from my drum 3.73 rear to the installed disc 3.73 (which was 21MM). Also found a vacuum dist so I am closer to turning this danged engine on.Well, how was the softball game? Who won, the 4th genners?
Last edited by MRZ28HO; Nov 16, 2002 at 06:29 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 1
From: was: Palmdale, Ca
Car: was: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: was: L69
Transmission: was: 700-R4
Oh, here's a good question (should have noticed this while at the 'yards
). Those that have rear discs with the opposed calipers ... on the passenger's side, how is the e-brake cable routed? Is it above the LCA or underneath it? I thought it was supposed to be routed above, so that when the suspension is unloaded it would not stretch the cable. Doing it this way, my cable will not reach the center "Y" attachment. Seems like it wants to be routed underneath.
Driver's side fits fine.
). Those that have rear discs with the opposed calipers ... on the passenger's side, how is the e-brake cable routed? Is it above the LCA or underneath it? I thought it was supposed to be routed above, so that when the suspension is unloaded it would not stretch the cable. Doing it this way, my cable will not reach the center "Y" attachment. Seems like it wants to be routed underneath.
Driver's side fits fine. Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: Woodland Hills, CA USA
Car: Yes...
Engine: Last time I checked...
Transmission: See "Engine"...
Originally posted by MRZ28HO
Oh, here's a good question (should have noticed this while at the 'yards
). Those that have rear discs with the opposed calipers ... on the passenger's side, how is the e-brake cable routed? Is it above the LCA or underneath it? I thought it was supposed to be routed above, so that when the suspension is unloaded it would not stretch the cable. Doing it this way, my cable will not reach the center "Y" attachment. Seems like it wants to be routed underneath.
Driver's side fits fine.
Oh, here's a good question (should have noticed this while at the 'yards
). Those that have rear discs with the opposed calipers ... on the passenger's side, how is the e-brake cable routed? Is it above the LCA or underneath it? I thought it was supposed to be routed above, so that when the suspension is unloaded it would not stretch the cable. Doing it this way, my cable will not reach the center "Y" attachment. Seems like it wants to be routed underneath.
Driver's side fits fine. What else was left on the '88 GTA at the yard? The only thing I could really use is the can for the air filter. I still plan to modify one so I can relocate my MAT sensor. I already have a V6 can with the bung in it and plan to cut it out and rivet it on to a V8 can.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 1
From: was: Palmdale, Ca
Car: was: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: was: L69
Transmission: was: 700-R4
Thanks Bret.
I really can't remember, since I was after the brake lines. IIRC it might have had some ducting still, motor was gone.
I really can't remember, since I was after the brake lines. IIRC it might have had some ducting still, motor was gone.
Senior Member



Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 707
Likes: 48
From: So. Cal
Car: '89 GTA, '15 Camaro LS 6sp.
Engine: L98, LFX.
Transmission: 4L60, AY6.
Axle/Gears: 3.27's.
Bret, I thought MAT relocation was a waste of effort since it only controls EGR duty cycle on MAF equipped TPI's?
Did you convert over to speed density?
If so, did you make conversion (permanent) or (switchable) back to the 165 MAF based system like the guy did in the tech article?
-Mike
Did you convert over to speed density?
If so, did you make conversion (permanent) or (switchable) back to the 165 MAF based system like the guy did in the tech article?
-Mike
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: Woodland Hills, CA USA
Car: Yes...
Engine: Last time I checked...
Transmission: See "Engine"...
Originally posted by Mikos_89
Did you convert over to speed density?
-Mike
Did you convert over to speed density?
-Mike
Trending Topics
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Originally posted by Mikos_89
Bret, I thought MAT relocation was a waste of effort since it only controls EGR duty cycle on MAF equipped TPI's?
-Mike
Bret, I thought MAT relocation was a waste of effort since it only controls EGR duty cycle on MAF equipped TPI's?
-Mike
I have a question about MAF...
Is it possible to go from MAP to MAF on a TBI? Is there an advantage to this, disadvantage? Is there a different ECM that is used? Different prom...
I understand the sensor is placed on the intake tube (for lack of a better word) well ahead of the throttle body.
Lotta questions, but just trying to learn the difference between MAP and MAF.
Ctown
Is it possible to go from MAP to MAF on a TBI? Is there an advantage to this, disadvantage? Is there a different ECM that is used? Different prom...
I understand the sensor is placed on the intake tube (for lack of a better word) well ahead of the throttle body.
Lotta questions, but just trying to learn the difference between MAP and MAF.
Ctown
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






