Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Sway bar end links-How tight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2003 | 08:03 PM
  #1  
Briansz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Sway bar end links-How tight?

I just replaced rear shocks & springs. All went according to plan except I had to remove swaybar endlinks to get the springs out. I ended up getting some new ones from NAPA. But- does anyone know how tight they have to be? I have a torque wrench but did not find a number in the manual I have.
Also, how can you accurately torque the shock upper mounting nut if you have to hold the stud to keep it from turning?
Thanks.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2003 | 08:41 PM
  #2  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
when i did my rear end links i searched on here and it seems roughly 15 foot pounds equates to the poly or rubber bushings being compressed to about the size of the metal washers.

good question about the top strut nut, i just went as hard as i could with the proper wrench holding the inside and tightened the nut down.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #3  
v8unleashed's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, VA
Hayne's has the numbers in there, at the beginning of the suspension section I think.

I dont have any of my manuals with me, but IIRC it's like 13ft-lbs front and 12ft-lbs rear.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2003 | 10:34 PM
  #4  
CaysE's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 7
From: Dirty Jersey
Here's what I got:

HAYNES says:
"shock absorber to upper mount nut" in the rear: 156 in-lbs.
"strut to upper mount nut" in front: 50 ft-lbs.
end-links: fronts should be 168 in-lbs and the rears should be 144 in-lbs.

CHILTON says:
"shock absorber (upper end)" in the rear: 13 ft-lbs (156 in-lbs)
"strut to upper mount nut" in front: 82-84: 50 ft-lbs, 85-86: 44 ft-lbs, 87-88: 52 ft-lbs, 89-91: 46 ft-lbs, 92: 44 ft-lbs
end links: fronts should be 15 ft-lbs (180 in-lbs) except 1992 w/handling package, which are 18 ft-lbs (216 in-lbs). the rears are listed two different ways here, which I don't understand at all. Here's what it says:
"stabilizer link-to-bar": 82-87: 12 ft-lbs (144 in-lbs), 88-91: 16 ft-lbs (192 in-lbs), 92: 18 ft-lbs (216 in-lbs).
"stabilizer link-to-frame": 35 ft-lbs

Interpret as you will, but I have no clue why there is such a discrepency between both books (Haynes probably just rounded off, as they tend to do), as well as within Chilton's itself. The "stabilizer link-to-frame" doesn't make any sense, since it should be the same torque on both the top and bottom of the end-link.

Last edited by CaysE; Sep 14, 2003 at 10:37 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 11:17 AM
  #5  
Briansz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Thanks-
CaysE- I don't understand that "link to frame" figure either, I'll just torque to the 12 ft-lbs
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #6  
TheGreatJ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
Car: 91Z, 91RS, '84 Jimmy
Engine: L98, 355, L98
Transmission: 700R, T56, 700R4
"Link to frame" probably means bracket bolts.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Orr89RocZ
Power Adders
206
Apr 25, 2016 08:28 AM
deracer
Camaros for Sale
3
Apr 11, 2016 12:04 AM
1992rs/ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Jan 28, 2016 09:58 PM
Warlocksirix
Suspension and Chassis
27
Sep 3, 2015 12:26 PM
ProtoMaster22
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 26, 2015 07:50 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.