Cc635 Vs 5665
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T-5
Cc635 Vs 5665
So I'm going to replace my springs struts and shocks this weekend. I can't decide on my rear springs. I'm going Federal Mogul all around. I'm putting 5662 springs on the front, but what about the rear? I've been reading people complaining that the CC635's are too high or stiff or both. Are the 5665 springs that much better?
Napa's got the CC635 in stock, but I have to order the 5665 and pay an extra $15 bucks shipping -- and do the rears next weekend. I don't want to wait (and pay extra $$) but I don't want to be sorry either. A website shows the spring rate on the CC635 as 104, and the 5665 as 107. Doesnt' that make the 5665's stiffer?
Anybody had experience with both?
Napa's got the CC635 in stock, but I have to order the 5665 and pay an extra $15 bucks shipping -- and do the rears next weekend. I don't want to wait (and pay extra $$) but I don't want to be sorry either. A website shows the spring rate on the CC635 as 104, and the 5665 as 107. Doesnt' that make the 5665's stiffer?
Anybody had experience with both?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





