Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

building weight jack system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2007, 01:23 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Electron_Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83 Camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: th350
building weight jack system

I am looking into building a weight jack system for my camaro. I dont really have much experience with how a true weight jack system works so im not sure exactly what i need to buy.

http://www.daymotorsports.com/product/345/c/S27/#

would that system work?
Old 03-19-2007, 06:10 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
BMmonteSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
Sure will, and it's pretty cheap too isn't it?

I made the same setup they have there by welding the nut to a plate, that is the first place I've seen that has the nut already welded to a plate that is the same diameter as the stock spring.

What you'll have to to is cut off the "fingers" that hold the stock spring in place so the plate has a semi flat place to sit. They you'll have to enlarge the hole a the top of the spring seat so the jack bolt will stick up into the engine compartment. You'l have to scope this out a bit as I did this on a G-body and I've only quickly glanced at my brothers F-body to see if it was doable, and it appears the two cars are built very similar other than I had to relocate my shock out side of the spring pocket.

The rear will be a bit more complicated, you could also do some cutting and welding on the upper spring seat, but you may be able to flip the jack upside down and mount it with the bolt coming out of the bottom of the lower spring perch. Again you'll have to cut off the locating ring.

You'll have to do some cutting and welding but it's completely doable and will allow you to use any of the cheap racing springs out there without worrying if they are the right height or not.
Old 03-29-2007, 06:20 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
rgauder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Re: building weight jack system

Originally Posted by BMmonteSS
You'l have to scope this out a bit as I did this on a G-body and I've only quickly glanced at my brothers F-body to see if it was doable, and it appears the two cars are built very similar other than I had to relocate my shock out side of the spring pocket.
I don't see much similarity in the front suspension between a G-body and a third gen F-body?
Old 03-29-2007, 06:59 PM
  #4  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: building weight jack system

Originally Posted by rgauder
I don't see much similarity in the front suspension between a G-body and a third gen F-body?
Actually there is alot of similariy, and along with the s10. The only difference is we have a strut for an upper control.
Old 03-29-2007, 08:09 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
rgauder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Re: building weight jack system

Originally Posted by Dale
Actually there is alot of similariy, and along with the s10. The only difference is we have a strut for an upper control.
That's like saying an apple and an orange have a lot in common because they are both fruit.

One is a MacPherson strut front suspension type and the other a double wishbone coil sprung suspension. Similar in that they are independent front suspensions as opposed to dependent.
Old 03-29-2007, 08:25 PM
  #6  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (12)
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: building weight jack system

The control arm design is the same.
The spring sits in the same spot
ball joints, and from the center of the spindle down is the same
wheel bearings, breaks, rotors all the same.

I guess in technical terms, they are different. But the basic design is the same.


As for installing weight jacks, its "the same". You just dont have to relocate the shock.

I always wanted to adapt the upper strut part onto my s10 after I air bagged it.
Old 03-30-2007, 12:01 AM
  #7  
Junior Member

 
Al Miles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lehigh Valley area of PA
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: $150 82 Camaro
Engine: 406 when my ship comes in
Transmission: 6 speed Richmond (its that ship business again)
Re: building weight jack system

Originally Posted by BeNnYBooPy
I am looking into building a weight jack system for my camaro. I dont really have much experience with how a true weight jack system works so im not sure exactly what i need to buy.

http://www.daymotorsports.com/product/345/c/S27/#

would that system work?
I have gone this route on all four corners of my 82. Its a little more complicated than just welding weight jacks into the existing spring pockets. This can result in raising the vehicle even in the lowest position (threads of the adjuster backed completely off) with stock springs because the adjuster takes up space inside the spring tower. Springs that would normally lower the vehicle may leave the vehicle at stock height. I made new spring buckets that gave the springs and extra 1 1/2" of adjustment. The rear buckets were also moved inboard and the rear bump stops removed from their stock location resulting in a small amount of additional tire clearance. If you want to do this project correctly, it is a lot of work and I can supply you with the details. Its much easier to buy a tubular subframe and A arms, then convert to coilovers all the way around (but its more expensive and not DIY).

Al Miles
Old 03-30-2007, 07:50 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
BMmonteSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
Re: building weight jack system

I would ASSume that if you were going through the trouble of installing a weight jack system that you would be able to calculate spring rates. This way you can take "crappy" springs from base model cars and trim them to your desired rate and then be able to set your ride height. The aftermarket circle track springs come in several lengths so you should be able to get a spring short enough to set your ride height.

I took a set of 420 lb/in springs and cut 2 coils off, I can't remember the exact numbers but it worked out to be over 650 lb/in and I was right in the middle of my adjustment on my weight jacks. I'm now running 700 lb/in IROC springs with 2 coils cut (910 lb/in now). Super cheap and super easy
Old 04-07-2007, 05:12 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: building weight jack system

Originally Posted by Al Miles
I have gone this route on all four corners of my 82. Its a little more complicated than just welding weight jacks into the existing spring pockets. This can result in raising the vehicle even in the lowest position (threads of the adjuster backed completely off) with stock springs because the adjuster takes up space inside the spring tower. Springs that would normally lower the vehicle may leave the vehicle at stock height. I made new spring buckets that gave the springs and extra 1 1/2" of adjustment.
A little more complicated in what way? Sounds like you just need to account for the height of the adjusters and choose a spring with the rate that you want and appropriate height, are there other issues?

The rear buckets were also moved inboard and the rear bump stops removed from their stock location resulting in a small amount of additional tire clearance. If you want to do this project correctly, it is a lot of work and I can supply you with the details. Its much easier to buy a tubular subframe and A arms, then convert to coilovers all the way around (but its more expensive and not DIY).
I’m sure I’m not the only one that would love to see real details. This is something that I’ve long considered, and has the advantage over coil overs in that it still focuses stresses in the locations that were designed to deal with them, and more importantly, the adjusters are mounted to the body so the added weight is sprung rather then unsprung.

BMmonteSS, have you done this on an f-body or g-body? Details? Pics?
Old 04-07-2007, 09:42 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (33)
 
FSTFBDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Boosted Land
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Re: building weight jack system

id love to see some pic's also.
Old 04-08-2007, 01:19 PM
  #11  
HPE
Banned
 
HPE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: building weight jack system

For what its worth, if you are planning on installing a weightjack or coilover provisions on any car then you'd better plan on the necessary cost of having access to scales, alignment/suspension gauge equipment and a pyrometer to properly set the corner weights and tire temps- otherwise its just plain a waste of money if you do not have the knowledge and tools to make them bneficial- if you do not, the car will most likely end up in worst handling shape do to it being set uneven more so than simple rated and lengthed coventional springs on a factory chassis position.
Old 04-08-2007, 07:07 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (33)
 
FSTFBDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Boosted Land
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Re: building weight jack system

I already have coil overs in all 4 corners. Still like to see pic's of this setup. Who knows if I ever chane my mind and don't want to run this setup down the road.
Old 04-08-2007, 08:55 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: building weight jack system

Originally Posted by HPE
For what its worth, if you are planning on installing a weightjack or coilover provisions on any car then you'd better plan on the necessary cost of having access to scales, alignment/suspension gauge equipment and a pyrometer to properly set the corner weights and tire temps- otherwise its just plain a waste of money if you do not have the knowledge and tools to make them bneficial- if you do not, the car will most likely end up in worst handling shape do to it being set uneven more so than simple rated and lengthed coventional springs on a factory chassis position.
Aren’t you supposed to be banned or something?

Why are you wasting time telling this to 2 people that would definitely know it, if not possibly know it better than you do?

So back to the conversation, where did Al… and BM… go?
Old 04-09-2007, 12:45 AM
  #14  
HPE
Banned
 
HPE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: building weight jack system

Hey aswipe Wasn't talking to you or your two buddies. I was directing my comment to the guy that started this post- BennyBoopy.

Thanks for caring though.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
customblackbird
Suspension and Chassis
4
08-15-2021 10:16 PM
NORTz89
Suspension and Chassis
32
05-20-2020 03:51 PM
Orr89RocZ
Power Adders
206
04-25-2016 08:28 AM
69 Six Pack
Camaros for Sale
13
10-05-2015 07:51 PM
makaveli09
Exhaust
1
08-12-2015 09:07 PM



Quick Reply: building weight jack system



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.