I know why the passengerside rear is lower
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,804
Likes: 103
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
I know why the passengerside rear is lower
Ive had this problem and a bunch of other people have stated that they also have this issue. I've had 3 different sets of springs and shocks on the car and never helped, thought the chassis was twisted from the epic, stump pulling power of the legendary old LG4
.
anyway i just swapped coil-overs on my car this weekend and when re-assembling things i found this. the reason my car was sitting lower was because the spring perch on the axle was lower on the passengerside then on the driverside! dont know if this is from stress of a lazy worker and the assembly line.
thought i would let you guys know
. anyway i just swapped coil-overs on my car this weekend and when re-assembling things i found this. the reason my car was sitting lower was because the spring perch on the axle was lower on the passengerside then on the driverside! dont know if this is from stress of a lazy worker and the assembly line.
thought i would let you guys know
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 13
From: Ottawa, ONT
Car: 1987 Firebird
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Re: I know why the passengerside rear is lower
Really? got any pix?
I dont think i have this prob, but how much of a difference are we talking here?
I dont think i have this prob, but how much of a difference are we talking here?
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,804
Likes: 103
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: I know why the passengerside rear is lower
my passengerside was 3/8 to a 1/2 inch lower than driverside, ill get some pics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 1982 Trans Am & 1982 Corvette
Engine: L-98 with LO-3 induction. 350 CFI
Transmission: 5 speed and vette has 700r4
Axle/Gears: 373's in T/A .. vette unknown
Re: I know why the passengerside rear is lower
when my 82 was a open rear and all stock it did this as well passenger rear always sat lower. But when I changed to a posi rear with matched springs it got the car level. I think it's just stress a open rear puts on the right rear on take off is all that causes it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,804
Likes: 103
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: I know why the passengerside rear is lower
it was like that sitting still.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
From: California
Car: 1982 Trans Am & 1982 Corvette
Engine: L-98 with LO-3 induction. 350 CFI
Transmission: 5 speed and vette has 700r4
Axle/Gears: 373's in T/A .. vette unknown
Re: I know why the passengerside rear is lower
Yes with car sitting still right rear always sagged. Then put my 1984 posi rearend and original spring and the car sat level after that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM
Dialed_In
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 20, 2015 01:45 PM






