ride height stance
ride height stance
ive read a couple threads on lowering and highering the car but im still not sure about it. what i want is the look with the front lower then the back. ive been looking at kits that lower the front more then the rear but i want to know maybe if theres something cheaper then a whole kit like something i can use to just lower the front. and if im just lowering the front do i really need the LCA relocation brackets and adjustable pan hard bar?
if anyone has any suggestions let me know or any pictures of their car with this kind of stance.
thanks
if anyone has any suggestions let me know or any pictures of their car with this kind of stance.
thanks
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 632
Likes: 4
From: Bethlehem, CT
Car: 1983 Firebird SE
Engine: C5 LS1
Transmission: 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: ride height stance
Springs are how you do it.
Much easier in the rear. You just release the top shock mount and lower the axle. In the front you have to open the suspension, tricky! Instructions posted somewhere here. They start with "Be Careful".
BTW, in a few months I will have a pair of front Eibachs available.
Much easier in the rear. You just release the top shock mount and lower the axle. In the front you have to open the suspension, tricky! Instructions posted somewhere here. They start with "Be Careful".
BTW, in a few months I will have a pair of front Eibachs available.
Re: ride height stance
Springs are how you do it.
Much easier in the rear. You just release the top shock mount and lower the axle. In the front you have to open the suspension, tricky! Instructions posted somewhere here. They start with "Be Careful".
BTW, in a few months I will have a pair of front Eibachs available.
Much easier in the rear. You just release the top shock mount and lower the axle. In the front you have to open the suspension, tricky! Instructions posted somewhere here. They start with "Be Careful".
BTW, in a few months I will have a pair of front Eibachs available.
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Marseilles, IL
Car: 91 RS, 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TBI, still deciding
Transmission: 700R-4, still deciding
Axle/Gears: stock, 3:73 IROC
Re: ride height stance
You mean the mean aggressive look from the 80's that sucked for traction?
Re: ride height stance
i just want the front lower then the back. like idk what to call it i guess a drag look. traction isnt much to me i have a 2.8 v6 and its by no means a race car. im going with all beauty with this car lol
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Marseilles, IL
Car: 91 RS, 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TBI, still deciding
Transmission: 700R-4, still deciding
Axle/Gears: stock, 3:73 IROC
Re: ride height stance
Easiest and cheapest would probably be a pair of air shocks in the back.
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: ride height stance
I always free it from the bottom, as it seems easier.
One cheap and easy way to raise the rear is to use a fourthgen spring isolator, which will get you an inch or so, IIRC. At considerably more cost, Moog 5665 rear springs will do the job.
JamesC
One cheap and easy way to raise the rear is to use a fourthgen spring isolator, which will get you an inch or so, IIRC. At considerably more cost, Moog 5665 rear springs will do the job.JamesC
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 PM







