Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Poly Inserts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:04 AM
  #1  
rs_z28_vert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, TN
Poly Inserts

Hey guys,
Could you tell me how and how hard it is to install poly engine mount inserts? Also, is it worth the hassle? One more thing, I have a steering box from a 1985 z28, is it a close ratio steering box? Thanx in advance.

Last edited by rs_z28_vert; Feb 24, 2010 at 01:18 AM. Reason: added another ?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #2  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: Poly Inserts

Originally Posted by rs_z28_vert
Hey guys,
Could you tell me how and how hard it is to install poly engine mount inserts? Also, is it worth the hassle? One more thing, I have a steering box from a 1985 z28, is it a close ratio steering box?
It's been a long while since I messed with the motor mounts, but as I recall, the mount has to be removed. For ES, you have to use the OE clam shell. To insert the poly mount, you need to drill out the welds, then reweld after inserting the mount. The process is a pain, but like all the OE rubber on your car, the mounts have probably taken a dump--they had on my 85.

Here's some general info (I'd like to give credit, but I don't recall where I found the info):

• “WS” – 1982-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (just like your Z/28, this may be the box that you Z originally had.

• “XH” – 1985-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (this box was also installed on Z/28’s and other high performance Camaros; it has slightly more steering effort required than the WS box.) NOTE – I believe this box was used on cars originally equipped with 16” wheels

• “WN” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 14.1 ratio

• “WP” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 13:1-15:1 variable ratio (used in Berlinettas, least steering effort required of all third gen. Camaro steering boxes)

• “JL” – 1986-1992 Camaro – 14.1 ratio (base Camaro steering box)

JamesC
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #3  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,066
From: Salina, KS
Re: Poly Inserts

Energy Suspension supplies giant zip ties. After you remove the rubber insert, and get the poly insert in place, you zip tie the bracket around the insert, bolt it to the crossmember, then cut the zip ties. Welding the brackets back together would work, but it's not really necessary.

Edit: I guess I forgot to answer the question. I don't know if they're really worth the trouble. I put a set in my 86 T/A when I switched from the 305 to a 350. They didn't feel any different then stock rubber, but I think they did a better job. The hardest part was getting the nuts and washers up in the crossmember. My solution was to superglue the washers to the nuts, then use a wobble joint. Of course I did mine with the engine out of the car. I don't think I'd bother if the engine wasn't coming out for some reason.

Last edited by Drew; Feb 24, 2010 at 10:33 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
rs_z28_vert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, TN
Re: Poly Inserts

Thanx James and Drew. I think I will go ahead and put the poly mounts in since i am doing a motor change as soon as it comes from the machine shop. 327 bored .040 with vortec heads, tbi, and EBL if your wondering. The engine swap is happening on my 88 vert, I had the 85 for parts. I'm swapping to a t5, thisis the reason for the mounts, I've been told that poly engine and trans mounts along with othyer things extend the longevity of a t5 because there is alot less twist with the mounts and SFC's. So would I be better off with the steering box from the 85 z28 or the one that is already in my 88 S/C? Thanx again for the responses guys.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2010 | 09:56 PM
  #5  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: Poly Inserts

the mounts are a thousand times easier to do with the a-arms and suspension removed.

Drew, i like the superglue idea.

as for needing the mounts, its not a bad idea, but it will raise the engine a bit, since the rubber mushes under the weight of the engine where the poly doesnt as much.

you have to see what box you have to determine if the 85 one is better, however, being a 25 year old part, it could be in dire need of a rebuild
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
Sep 30, 2018 09:14 AM
Gunner242
Electronics
7
Dec 25, 2015 04:49 PM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
gord327
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
Oct 3, 2015 01:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM.