Swaybar selection/Endlink question
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Swaybar selection/Endlink question
I've got a 32mm solid front bar and a 34mm hollow front bar for my '90
Camaro RS w/16" wheels. Which one do you guys think would be the better
choice? Obviously the 34mm is lighter, but would it be the better choice?
Also, how does endlink length affect the performance of the swaybar? I've
noticed that the ads foor poly bushing endlink kits tell you to measure your
stock spacer length. What if hte vehicle is lowered? Should the endlinks
be shorter to compensate? Is there a specific relationship I should look
for between the swaybar arms and the control arms? Parallel?
------------------
Stephen Cranford
http://www.geocities.com/chevyraceshop
http://austin.f-body.org/members/cranford
97 Tahoe SS
90 Camaro RS
Camaro RS w/16" wheels. Which one do you guys think would be the better
choice? Obviously the 34mm is lighter, but would it be the better choice?
Also, how does endlink length affect the performance of the swaybar? I've
noticed that the ads foor poly bushing endlink kits tell you to measure your
stock spacer length. What if hte vehicle is lowered? Should the endlinks
be shorter to compensate? Is there a specific relationship I should look
for between the swaybar arms and the control arms? Parallel?
------------------
Stephen Cranford
http://www.geocities.com/chevyraceshop
http://austin.f-body.org/members/cranford
97 Tahoe SS
90 Camaro RS
I'm not sure about endlink length, but I would assume that if the car is lowered you would need shorter endlinks. The solid bar would probably be the better choice because even though it is smaller diameter it will be stiffer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




