Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Tubed or Boxed SFC's which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2001 | 10:33 AM
  #1  
BrianB's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Tubed or Boxed SFC's which is better?

Debating on getting tubed SFC's from BMR because I can get them in the color of my car, or getting boxed because they may be better? Your opinions are appreciated.

------------------
Founder of the Greater Cincinnati F-Body Association
Greater Cincinnati F-Body Association
1988 Yellow Trans Am GTA
Click here for photos
Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 10:41 AM
  #2  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
I'm certainly no engineer, but as I understand it, a tube is stronger than a box. If you'd like pics of the Global West tubular version, let me know.

JamesC

------------------
Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 12:51 PM
  #3  
formul8!!'s Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
From: www.thirdgentech.com
Car: 2004 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
The Hotchkis and Metco LCR's are a little over engineered and heavy for a fairly stock to mild street car.

BMR's are just fine. Go for the rubber/poly combo if you drive it daily. Will not be as harsh of a ride and still plant the tires hard on the pavement!!

Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 03:23 PM
  #4  
soulbounder's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 20
From: Tomball, TX
Car: 89 TTA
Engine: Turbo 3.8
Transmission: 200R4
"Which one do I choose? - While you can't go wrong with either design, use the following to determine your order: If strength is your number one priority, choose the boxed design. Boxed tubing is torsionally stronger than round tubing however you will lose approximately 3/4" of ground clearance when using this style. If your car is lowered and ground clearance is the prime concern, go with the tubular model. While round tubing is not as strong torsionally, there are other features to these subframe connectors that make them more rigid than most other tubular models available."

Straight from BMR's site. Depends on whether you need the clearance or the strength.
Reply
Old May 23, 2001 | 07:39 PM
  #5  
91RedBigFinZ's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
I didnt lose any ground clearance with my boxed Spohn connectors. Doug

------------------
Central Indiana Camaro Club member since Oct. 2000
1991 Z28 - 51,000 miles.
Dyno Results: 226.4 Max Hp; 310.4 Max Torque (ft-lbs)
All power options leather. 350 TPI:
K&N; Airfoil; Custom 'Ram-Air'; Slp Runners;Poweraid TB spacer;
Fastchip;
SLP Headers; Borla Catback 50% open; Dual factory Cats;
March underdrive pulleys;
Accel Extreme 9000 wires, Accel coil; Hypertech rotor & cap; NGK platinum plugs;
Manual fan switch;
TB coolant bypass; smog pump delete
Spohn subframe connectors (black powder coat);
Pirelli P7000 Z245/50/R16 all season tires;
Energy suspention motor mounts
S Cobra Radar Detector; Z28 SS Floormats;
Technalon IV car cover (now on my dad'a 2000 Berger SS).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
75bike
Interior
1
Sep 20, 2015 09:37 PM
BLK87Z
TBI
2
Sep 18, 2015 11:29 PM
bubbaz28
Suspension and Chassis
10
Sep 18, 2015 02:09 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
6
Sep 18, 2015 12:01 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 PM.