Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 09:22 AM
  #51  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 438
Likes: 1
From: state of confusion
Car: '08 Mustang GT
Engine: 4.6L
Transmission: º º 0 . . . |-|-|
Axle/Gears: 8.8", 3.55
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Another possibility

Many times when there are braces with no readily apparent function, they are there for NVH reasons. It doesn't take much to chase a few annoying structural vibrations off to frequencies and/or locations where they are less noticeable, once you know where to attach the bracing to. There may even be some advantage in making the bracing somewhat asymmetrical - at least then the two sides of the car aren't both chasing their nuisance vibrations off to the same new frequency and location(s). Two small vibrations are usually less bothersome than one big one.


Norm
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #52  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

What does NVH stand for? I assume the v is vibration and the h is for maybe harmonics?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2011 | 11:34 PM
  #53  
chazman's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,947
Likes: 644
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by InfernalVortex
What does NVH stand for? I assume the v is vibration and the h is for maybe harmonics?
Noise. Vibration. Harshness.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 09:59 AM
  #54  
MY87LT's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 17
From: Southern California
Car: 1987 Camaro LT
Engine: LG4 w/ SLP headers & a 3" catback
Transmission: THM700R4 (Stock)
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 gears. No Posi
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by JamesC
Don't recall anything ever being there on my car (LG4 originally). However, it has been awhile since the engine swap, so my memory could be faulty.

JamesC
My baro sensor came from the factory attached next to the other sensors behind the brake booster and I have a 1987 carb car.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 12:38 PM
  #55  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

The TBI Map sensor is on the firewall in that brace bolt hole.

Name:  100_5731.jpg
Views: 492
Size:  150.7 KB

Notice there is no brace. And that was back when the car was mostly stock.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 12:52 PM
  #56  
KiLLJ0Y's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 2
From: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Car: 1993 GMC Typhoon
Engine: 4.3 Turbo
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by JamesC
In the front suspension (diagram) portion of my 82-91 Parts & Illustration Cat., it's clearly labeled "Wonderbar". The description is Brace, Upr Structure 14042019.

JamesC
the discussion was that it was mislabled or misinterpreted at its conception.. one person or engineer calling it a wanderbar and being spelled wonderbar..
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 01:15 PM
  #57  
JamesC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by KiLLJ0Y
the discussion was that it was mislabled or misinterpreted at its conception.. one person or engineer calling it a wanderbar and being spelled wonderbar..
I see. Makes as much sense as anything else.

JamesC
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 01:44 PM
  #58  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by MY87LT
My baro sensor came from the factory attached next to the other sensors behind the brake booster and I have a 1987 carb car.
Odd. Was the Baro sensor mounted adjacent to the VAC sensor there? I've had two 87 LG4s and they all had the Baro on the right. One was a Z28 and had the brace there (I put it onto my SC that is shown in the pic).
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 03:10 PM
  #59  
MY87LT's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 17
From: Southern California
Car: 1987 Camaro LT
Engine: LG4 w/ SLP headers & a 3" catback
Transmission: THM700R4 (Stock)
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 gears. No Posi
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Here is a pic of my underhood showing the sensors all on the left.
Attached Thumbnails GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse-sensors.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 07:11 PM
  #60  
Pocket's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,122
Likes: 362
From: NC
Car: 91 Trans Am
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Must be a year thing. All of the later TBI cars mounted the MAP to the brace hole on the cowl. Carb and earlier engines mounted it on the relay bracket near the booster

Add to the list the fender braces on 91-92 birds. Goes from the base of the battery box on both sides to the top hole on the nose stud strip. You can see the pass brace in this pic
Attached Thumbnails GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse-hpim1319.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2011 | 07:16 PM
  #61  
MY87LT's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 17
From: Southern California
Car: 1987 Camaro LT
Engine: LG4 w/ SLP headers & a 3" catback
Transmission: THM700R4 (Stock)
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 gears. No Posi
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

GM has always made these "last minute changes" to their cars. I just learned to accept it and enjoy an oddity or two.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 06:46 AM
  #62  
naf's Avatar
naf
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,338
Likes: 73
From: Lexington, SC
Car: 1987 SC/1985 TA
Engine: 350/vortec/fitech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by MY87LT
Here is a pic of my underhood showing the sensors all on the left.
You've got BOTH the VAC and MAP on the left? And you converted your LG4 to the serp drive? Looks good.


Originally Posted by Pocket
Must be a year thing. All of the later TBI cars mounted the MAP to the brace hole on the cowl. Carb and earlier engines mounted it on the relay bracket near the booster
Don't get someone confused: Carb=Vacuum sensor / TBI=Manifold Absolute Pressure sensor. That's why the carb'd cars needed the additional Barometric Pressure sensor.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 10:40 AM
  #63  
MY87LT's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 17
From: Southern California
Car: 1987 Camaro LT
Engine: LG4 w/ SLP headers & a 3" catback
Transmission: THM700R4 (Stock)
Axle/Gears: Stock 2.73 gears. No Posi
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

I did convert to the serpentine set up after I got tired of all the damn belts. Although I did keep my old set up and put it away.

Everything is stock under my hood with the exception of the air cleaner lid, slp headers, serpentine set up, and the addition of the "wonder/wander" bar and the cowl to fender brace.

Still debating on intalling the final brace which goes from the right strut tower to the frame. I really would like to know the effectiveness of it.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2012 | 07:21 PM
  #64  
Edwardgp's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 34
From: Washington State
Car: 1983 BB 1995 Z28 Camaro's
Engine: 454-350
Transmission: TH350-4l60e
Axle/Gears: 373 posi-Stock
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Every time I find one of these braces that I don't have, I have fabricated one and installed it on 83 BB Camaro. I don't know why, I guess they must be there for a reason. The next one will be the bar on the passenger side mid strut tower to frame. Gosh I did it again, sorry for digging this up.

Last edited by Edwardgp; Oct 12, 2012 at 07:25 PM. Reason: Digging up old thread SORRY
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2012 | 02:50 AM
  #65  
novaderrik's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 6
From: Howard Lake, MN
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 355- hopefully a 5.3 this summer
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by Edwardgp
Every time I find one of these braces that I don't have, I have fabricated one and installed it on 83 BB Camaro. I don't know why, I guess they must be there for a reason. The next one will be the bar on the passenger side mid strut tower to frame. Gosh I did it again, sorry for digging this up.
GM didn't just put stuff on cars for the hell of it- every one of those braces served a function that was important enough to justify designing, testing, manufacturing, and installing them onto the cars. these cars aren't built very stout, so adding as many braces as you can to them can only be a good thing.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2012 | 07:46 AM
  #66  
stealtht/a's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,485
Likes: 5
From: Short Summer, VT
Car: 1985 Trans Am T-Top
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi 1LE 10 bolt
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

I'm thinking that pass side firewall brace is there because they recognized a weakness there because of the large hole in the firewall for the ac duct and the gap for the channel drain.
Many third gens seem to have a problem with leakage there, maybe the seam gets distorted by hard cornering. I might add that brace to my 85.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2012 | 09:00 AM
  #67  
Edwardgp's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 34
From: Washington State
Car: 1983 BB 1995 Z28 Camaro's
Engine: 454-350
Transmission: TH350-4l60e
Axle/Gears: 373 posi-Stock
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Yep I made and installed that brace. All the holes are already there.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2012 | 02:04 PM
  #68  
akanitro's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 475
Likes: 8
From: Houston, TX
Car: 1989 GTA, 2004 Z06, 2008 Expedition
Engine: L98, LS3, 5.4L
Transmission: 700R4, MN6, Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23, 3.42, ?
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Great Post. Now its time to start bracing the car where ever I can. Obviously, subframe connectors and wonder bar are not going to be enough.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 07:21 PM
  #69  
neilb's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 400
Likes: 1
From: Orillia On,
Car: 1986 sports coupe, 1984 F41
Engine: 3.8L Turbo SFI, stock 305
Transmission: 700 R4, 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1, 3.08:1
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

I wonder if the braces were dependant on the engine/trans setup. I would guess a 5.0l with a manual would stress the unibody differently than say a 2.8 with auto.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2012 | 06:14 AM
  #70  
Edwardgp's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 34
From: Washington State
Car: 1983 BB 1995 Z28 Camaro's
Engine: 454-350
Transmission: TH350-4l60e
Axle/Gears: 373 posi-Stock
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

That might be, if anyone one has the k member braces they don't want, let me know. I can always make them if need be.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 09:14 PM
  #71  
APACHE JOHN's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: FARMINGTON AR
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI RAMJET COMING
Transmission: T56
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

I remember reading back in the day it was called a "wonderbar" because of how effective it was for such a small effort. Basically a less intrusive strut tower brace. Which I believe is a better improvement. But on another note the wonderbar puts the weight lower in the chassis.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 06:03 PM
  #72  
-AO-'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
Car: 3rd gen!
Engine: SBC
Transmission: yes
Axle/Gears: yes
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Like I've always said, every 3rd gen should have a wonderbar. TDS makes the best ones.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2015 | 06:37 PM
  #73  
Tibo's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

It seems that all of these little braces are for the steering box or strut towers. I would think that adding a wonder bar and triangulated strut tower brace would allow you to remove the brace connecting the tower to cowl, upper cor support to battery tray/wheel arch and strut tower to frame. Any thoughts on that?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 12:45 AM
  #74  
JamesC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by Tibo
I would think that adding a wonder bar and triangulated strut tower brace would allow you to remove the brace connecting the tower to cowl, upper cor support to battery tray/wheel arch and strut tower to frame. Any thoughts on that?
Remove for what purpose?

JamesC
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 08:20 AM
  #75  
Tibo's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by JamesC
Remove for what purpose?

JamesC
Not needed anymore. Those small braces seem to be for keeping the strut tower or wheel arch in the same position which is what a triangulated strut tower brace does.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 08:51 AM
  #76  
JamesC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by Tibo
Not needed anymore. Those small braces seem to be for keeping the strut tower or wheel arch in the same position which is what a triangulated strut tower brace does.
My car is equipped with all the pieces you mention. Personally I didn't feel the need to remove anything. Seems to me they can only help, but each to his own opinion.

JamesC
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 10:48 AM
  #77  
-=Z28=-'s Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 48
From: Minnesota
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Id be curious to see how much they twist/flex w/o and with the braces. If someone has a go pro, they could rig it and some arrows under the hood, indicating how much twist/flex there is.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 12:22 PM
  #78  
Tibo's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,028
Likes: 78
From: Desert
Car: 1991 Z28 Vert
Engine: 383 single plane efi
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 8.8 with 3.73s
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by JamesC
My car is equipped with all the pieces you mention. Personally I didn't feel the need to remove anything. Seems to me they can only help, but each to his own opinion.

JamesC
Well, maybe you're misunderstanding my question or I didn't ask it well enough. Does a triangulated strut tower brace do the same job and if so wouldn't it do a better job than multiple stamped sheet metal pieces or 1/4" rod?

And as a separate question, if you welded up the heater core ,blower motor and heater hose openings the firewall would be stronger, would you still need the cowl to hood bracket piece?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 08:40 PM
  #79  
JamesC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Originally Posted by Tibo
Well, maybe you're misunderstanding my question or I didn't ask it well enough. Does a triangulated strut tower brace do the same job and if so wouldn't it do a better job than multiple stamped sheet metal pieces or 1/4" rod?
I have no idea. Perhaps someone with an engineering background could chime in. Also, as an aside, remember that after market strut mounts should be in place before the STB to eliminate as much flex as possible.

Best of luck in attempting to find answers.

JamesC
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2015 | 05:51 PM
  #80  
91 1LE's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 1
From: Litchfield Park
Car: '91 1LE
Engine: 377 w/Stealthram
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Torsen
Re: GM Braces That Amuse and Confuse

Just to add some confusion: My '91 1LE came with all the braces pictured but did NOT come with a "wonderbar" from the factory. The one other '91 1LE I have seen did not have one either.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galaxie500XL
History / Originality
42
Feb 1, 2020 04:53 AM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 03:46 PM
bubbaz28
Suspension and Chassis
10
Sep 18, 2015 02:09 PM
Ian Irvine
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 4, 2015 08:08 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.