Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2011 | 01:22 PM
  #1  
onemanrace's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Devon, UK
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Just a quick question:
My '89 RS had a much tighter turning circle than my '88 IROC-Z does.
It also didn't make the grinds and groans that the IROC-Z does (specifically a grind on full right - I know, I know, full lock should be avoided but we live in an imperfect world).

So, were the ratios different? If I could the steering of my RS onto my IROC, I'd be a happy man.
As part of my quest to get rid of the full-right-grind I suspect I'm going to end up replacing most, it not all, of the front steering set up, so I'm wondering if I should be factoring a new box to the bill as well.
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 06:35 AM
  #2  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Originally Posted by onemanrace
JMy '89 RS had a much tighter turning circle than my '88 IROC-Z does. It also didn't make the grinds and groans that the IROC-Z does.

So, were the ratios different?
The a-arm steering stops are different between 15" and 16" wheels (IIRC, the steering box stops are different as well). The wider IROC wheels/tires wouldn't help the the 'pushing/jumping reaction either.

Here's some general steering box info (I'd like to give credit, but I don't recall where I found the info):

• “WS” – 1982-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (just like your Z/28, this may be the box that you Z originally had.

• “XH” – 1985-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (this box was also installed on Z/28’s and other high performance Camaros; it has slightly more steering effort required than the WS box.) NOTE – I believe this box was used on cars originally equipped with 16” wheels

• “WN” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 14.1 ratio

• “WP” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 13:1-15:1 variable ratio (used in Berlinettas, least steering effort required of all third gen. Camaro steering boxes)

• “JL” – 1986-1992 Camaro – 14.1 ratio (base Camaro steering box)

JamesC
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 12:10 PM
  #3  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Please clarify, if you can, is that supposed to be 14:1, or 14.1:1? ( Not that it's a huge difference )
Reply
Old May 24, 2011 | 04:17 PM
  #4  
onemanrace's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Devon, UK
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Interesting, cheers for that.
Just wondering because I could turn the RS straight into my driveway, but the IROC needs a kinda 3 point manoeuvre to get her in. I guess the 16" wheels and the different stops are the reason why.
Reply
Old May 28, 2011 | 11:59 PM
  #5  
fishyz's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Pewaukee, WI
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T5
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

This is really neat. Thanks for posting it.
Reply
Old May 1, 2014 | 02:45 PM
  #6  
I H8 WWD's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 6
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Thanks for this informaiton JamesC. I am looking into a steering box upgrade and wanted to make sure I don't buy the same ratio box just cleaned up.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2015 | 09:18 PM
  #7  
dennisschreuer's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Palm Desert, CA.
Car: 87 RS Camaro
Engine: LS6
Transmission: Tremec 6 Speed
Axle/Gears: FAB 9, Floater, 370 True Trac
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Originally Posted by JamesC
The a-arm steering stops are different between 15" and 16" wheels (IIRC, the steering box stops are different as well). The wider IROC wheels/tires wouldn't help the the 'pushing/jumping reaction either.

Here's some general steering box info (I'd like to give credit, but I don't recall where I found the info):

• “WS” – 1982-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (just like your Z/28, this may be the box that you Z originally had.

• “XH” – 1985-1992 Camaro – 12.7:1 ratio (this box was also installed on Z/28’s and other high performance Camaros; it has slightly more steering effort required than the WS box.) NOTE – I believe this box was used on cars originally equipped with 16” wheels

• “WN” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 14.1 ratio

• “WP” – 1982-1985 Camaro – 13:1-15:1 variable ratio (used in Berlinettas, least steering effort required of all third gen. Camaro steering boxes)

• “JL” – 1986-1992 Camaro – 14.1 ratio (base Camaro steering box)

JamesC
Hi Sir James, where may these codes be located, a tag on the steering box or inside the glove box? Would a VIN number help? I have a 1987 RS Camaro, just finished sticking a CTS V LS6 into it.
TXs
Dennis

Last edited by dennisschreuer; Jun 11, 2015 at 09:18 PM. Reason: misspell
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2015 | 08:31 AM
  #8  
dmccain's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,553
Likes: 806
From: South Ms
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Im not sure the part # but I got the fast ratio steering box replacement for my 89 WS6 Formula and WOW what a difference it was from any 3rd gen ive had as far as steering. If I remember right there were several different ones I could order but I went with the performance one that came with my car. But in saying that I replaced almost every suspension part and bushings under the whole car. World of difference
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2015 | 07:39 PM
  #9  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: RS vs IROC Steering ratios

Originally Posted by dennisschreuer
Hi Sir James, where may these codes be located, a tag on the steering box or inside the glove box? Would a VIN number help? I have a 1987 RS Camaro, just finished sticking a CTS V LS6 into it.
TXs
Dennis
The code (XH, WS, JL, ...) is ink stamped on the box itself. Usually on the far end cover and someplace on the top.

The problem is the ink, it doesn't last. So it becomes difficult to see the code on the box. RPO codes can help as certain steering boxes were dedicated to certain suspension & wheel/tire combinations.

But it isn't the end all to be all, as a different box could have been installed.

Counting input shaft turns lock-to-lock is helpful. So is using a protractor on the output shaft to measure the center-to-lock angles.

RBob.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlueIroc-Z
Camaros for Sale
7
Jun 9, 2019 03:22 AM
Out-Cast
Interior
4
Mar 22, 2019 09:39 PM
backtothe80s
Suspension and Chassis
33
Sep 5, 2015 12:39 AM
happyhapka
TPI
3
Aug 15, 2015 04:42 PM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 AM.