Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2011 | 08:36 AM
  #101  
TTOP350's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,228
Likes: 1,156
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Im patiently waiting for a fully welded roadrace version with spring pockets, 4 stock Aarms and in semi gloss black powdercoat.
I promise I WILL test the **** out of it

Anyone want a pos PA kmember? It will b 4sale.

Last edited by TTOP350; Nov 22, 2011 at 10:54 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 10:50 AM
  #102  
Eagle223usa's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
From: Pgh PA
Car: 89 5.7 IROC/95 LT1 Corvette
Engine: All 5.7's
Transmission: 700R4 (Roessler)/ZF6
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt Zexel 3.23's. CTW 17" wheel
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

If you really want to test that thing Ramey bring it to Pittsburgh! We have potholes with overlooks!
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 11:03 AM
  #103  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Hey Everyone,

We will be releasing the K-member tomorrow evening and offering it at a special price as an introductory offer during our annual Thanksgiving Sale. The downfall is shipping times will be 3-4 weeks on this item and we don't have all our pictures completed yet. We have a few pictures but not an accurate one with for the LSX block or coil over set ups. We are hoping everyone will work with us on this and trust us to supply a quality product like we have done for past 9 years. The introductory offer will be a prebuy at a discounted rate.

Thanks!
Ryan
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 04:46 PM
  #104  
L695speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Andover, NJ
Car: '88 Trans Am GTA; '84 Trans Am
Engine: L98 350TPI; 5.3 LSx built
Transmission: N/A; T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt; 3.73 10 bolt
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Ryan, I presume the whole catalog will be on sale? When does it start? I want to order up some A arms for my car so I can start assembling the front suspension and brakes. Also is shipping going to be free?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #105  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,812
Likes: 110
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by L695speed
Also is shipping going to be free?
I would doubt it.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 06:36 PM
  #106  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by L695speed
Ryan, I presume the whole catalog will be on sale? When does it start? I want to order up some A arms for my car so I can start assembling the front suspension and brakes. Also is shipping going to be free?

Beginning tomorrow afternoon until Monday night we will be offering all UMI items at 15% off and $9.99 flat rate shipping on all orders. Please check us out tomorrow. Thanks!
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 06:45 PM
  #107  
L695speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Andover, NJ
Car: '88 Trans Am GTA; '84 Trans Am
Engine: L98 350TPI; 5.3 LSx built
Transmission: N/A; T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt; 3.73 10 bolt
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
I would doubt it.
I heard somewhere it might be but I doubted it too. Better than nothing.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2011 | 06:46 PM
  #108  
L695speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Andover, NJ
Car: '88 Trans Am GTA; '84 Trans Am
Engine: L98 350TPI; 5.3 LSx built
Transmission: N/A; T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt; 3.73 10 bolt
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by UMI Performance
Beginning tomorrow afternoon until Monday night we will be offering all UMI items at 15% off and $9.99 flat rate shipping on all orders. Please check us out tomorrow. Thanks!
I'll be there for the A arms.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2011 | 01:12 AM
  #109  
Carlos773's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 3
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 97 LT1 W/ Alot of goodies.
Transmission: 4L60E W/ Yank SS3600
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt BW
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Summit has a sale going on. $340.

One question before I pull the trigger. The stock Poly are greaseable right?
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2011 | 09:33 AM
  #110  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Carlos773
Summit has a sale going on. $340.

One question before I pull the trigger. The stock Poly are greaseable right?
The polyurethane bushings in our a-arms are greaseable with grease fittings. Stock replacement polyurethane bushings that you would place in your stock arms would not be greaseable.

I hope that helps,
Ryan
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2011 | 09:50 AM
  #111  
BlackenedBird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 4
From: Central Texas
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by UMI Performance
The polyurethane bushings in our a-arms are greaseable with grease fittings. Stock replacement polyurethane bushings that you would place in your stock arms would not be greaseable.

I hope that helps,
Ryan
That statement sounds a bit misleading. Both would be greasable, just that yours are easier because the grease fittings. Put grease fittings in the stock a-arms & they'd be as easy as yours are.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2011 | 09:59 PM
  #112  
Iroc zseven's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Love the new K member but looking forward to the road racing one do you know how long down the road it will be to have them up and going
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 02:04 AM
  #113  
Carlos773's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 3
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 97 LT1 W/ Alot of goodies.
Transmission: 4L60E W/ Yank SS3600
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 Bolt BW
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by UMI Performance
The polyurethane bushings in our a-arms are greaseable with grease fittings. Stock replacement polyurethane bushings that you would place in your stock arms would not be greaseable.

I hope that helps,
Ryan
Awesome, another quick question. Is Summit still carrying the old version of the a-arms? Would it be a better bet to just order straight from you guys?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 07:45 AM
  #114  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Iroc zseven
Love the new K member but looking forward to the road racing one do you know how long down the road it will be to have them up and going
Glad you like it. I will be posting some details on the current K-members shortly so everyone has some detailed information on them. The road race version is still some time down the road. Also the RR version will be recommended for cars that are actually going to be road raced or auto crossed on a regular basis. For a street and strip car our current version would be recommended. Also the RR version will be $80-$100 more and hopefully available early next year.

Originally Posted by Carlos773
Awesome, another quick question. Is Summit still carrying the old version of the a-arms? Would it be a better bet to just order straight from you guys?
I am 99.9% sure that the A-arms Summit has in stock are the new version. We shipped them quite a few sets for the sale. So you can order from us or them
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 08:16 AM
  #115  
hellz_wings's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 2
From: Montreal, Canada
Car: 1986 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Engine: TPI 310ci (LB9)
Transmission: Custom Rebuilt 700R4 - 2600 Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.73 Eaton Limited-Slip
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

How will the road race version differ from the street/strip version? My car is a corner carver not a drag car and it will be hitting the circuit track a few times during the summer months..

Thnx!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 08:32 AM
  #116  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by hellz_wings
How will the road race version differ from the street/strip version? My car is a corner carver not a drag car and it will be hitting the circuit track a few times during the summer months..

Thnx!
To be honest we are not sure of a final design. A road race version was something we mentioned we may do but haven't completed a design at this point yet. If and when it is completed it will have extra material and bracing supporting areas of high load.. the downfall is it will be heavier.

The current design, although will work great on a drag raced car is also very suitable for street driving and handling applications. Our 4th gen RR version is used for applications such as American Iron and CMC.

I hope that helps,
Ryan
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2011 | 02:05 AM
  #117  
Iroc zseven's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

ok thanks looking forward to to th rr version i dont mind the weight because there are other way to save weight please keep me posted on when ity will be ready love what you guys are doing
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 07:40 PM
  #118  
Iroc zseven's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Any News on the road race k member coming out UMI
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 09:08 PM
  #119  
UMI Sales's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 30
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

We're pretty close. The pads are in production now, first production run of 20 sets.

Road race version will be a week or two behind the standard version.

Hopefully we can get shipments out within the next few weeks.

The best thing to do is sign up for our newsletter at: http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...page=subscribe

for when it comes out. Or, if you check on here I can give you the lowdown as well.

We are REALLY working on getting this right the first time. We want the k-member to bolt on perfectly and fit the maximum number of combinations upon release. We think you'll be thrilled.

Thanks for your interest and for choosing UMI!

ramey
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 09:20 PM
  #120  
Project-RS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by UMI Sales
We're pretty close. The pads are in production now, first production run of 20 sets.

Road race version will be a week or two behind the standard version.

Hopefully we can get shipments out within the next few weeks.

The best thing to do is sign up for our newsletter at: http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...page=subscribe

for when it comes out. Or, if you check on here I can give you the lowdown as well.

We are REALLY working on getting this right the first time. We want the k-member to bolt on perfectly and fit the maximum number of combinations upon release. We think you'll be thrilled.

Thanks for your interest and for choosing UMI!

ramey
i ordered the k member already. cant wait for it to get here. also will be ordering the a arms come tax time.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 09:25 PM
  #121  
UMI Sales's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 30
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Project-RS
i ordered the k member already. cant wait for it to get here. also will be ordering the a arms come tax time.
Nice! The k-member a-arm combo should help your car work pretty awesome.

I know we'll be fighting over the UMI IROC when it's back together. It's had four different prototypes in it getting everything lined up...

ramey
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 09:38 PM
  #122  
Project-RS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

i sent ryan some pics of the umi torque arm/ crossmember which he posted on facebook. project-rs will have everything umi as far as chassis/ suspension goes. when the warm weather gets here, ill push the car out of the garage and get much better pics. here is the small 355 that your parts will help grip the road.....lol

Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 09:42 PM
  #123  
UMI Sales's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 30
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Project-RS
i sent ryan some pics of the umi torque arm/ crossmember which he posted on facebook. project-rs will have everything umi as far as chassis/ suspension goes. when the warm weather gets here, ill push the car out of the garage and get much better pics. here is the small 355 that your parts will help grip the road.....lol

I'd hate to see if you built a big block! Sweet!

Thanks for choosing UMI and for putting some serious power through our parts. That'll be cool when you sky the front tires...
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2012 | 09:45 PM
  #124  
Project-RS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

i think 500hp on the street is plenty. and yes, this is going to be my grocery getter. no trailer queen here
Reply
Old May 6, 2014 | 09:43 PM
  #125  
DirtySpleen's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 L03
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.43 Torsen 10 bolt
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

What is the max angle you can get out of these?
Reply
Old May 7, 2014 | 07:54 AM
  #126  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by DirtySpleen
What is the max angle you can get out of these?
Do you mean steering travel you can get?

If so, the factory box will only allow you to rotate the wheel so far before it's maxed out. The stops should allow you to max the steering out.

I hope that helps,
Ryan
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 03:31 PM
  #127  
Base91's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1
From: Georgetown TX
Car: Base 91 'bird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27 & PBR
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Did the RR version ever happen?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 03:34 PM
  #128  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Base91
Did the RR version ever happen?
Which part are you referring to?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 03:35 PM
  #129  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Base91
Did the RR version ever happen?
For the K-member it did. Not sure RR versions of the A-arms are necessary.
http://umiperformance.com/catalog/in...roducts_id=732
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 03:45 PM
  #130  
Base91's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1
From: Georgetown TX
Car: Base 91 'bird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27 & PBR
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

The A-arms.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2014 | 04:05 PM
  #131  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by Base91
The A-arms.
There is actually no need for a RR version. The version we currently make has proven to withstand all abuse. We have been using our 1979 Monte Carlo as a test car for 2 years now, we use it for auto-x and road race, it has been attending more and more events each year. It uses the same a-arms as the 82-92 F-Body. I do recommend the Delrin bushing upgrade for handling applications. Here is a video of our Monte at the Syracuse Nationals autox put on by the American Street Car Series. It is headed to Pittsburgh next for the 1.6 mile road course.

Reply
Old Jul 31, 2014 | 12:58 PM
  #132  
Stewie's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Manual T5
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

WoW!!! Got so dizzy watching your video my inner ear and brain were screaming for relief.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2014 | 05:27 PM
  #133  
DirtySpleen's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 L03
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.43 Torsen 10 bolt
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

My question, how much steering angle could I get out of these arms as opposed to the stock set up?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2014 | 08:49 AM
  #134  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by DirtySpleen
My question, how much steering angle could I get out of these arms as opposed to the stock set up?
With our design you can make the steering stops shorter than factory. However the steering box itself has internal stops and will only go so far. So I honestly don't think you will get a lot.

I hope that helps,
Ryan
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2014 | 10:02 AM
  #135  
I H8 WWD's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 6
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Now for 2" extended a-arms for us Driftnuts.

I believe we talked with BMR who said the Gen1-2? Camaro a-arms are 2" longer and almost everything is the same minus the spring perch.

Nice work nonetheless UMI.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2014 | 10:11 AM
  #136  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: Redesigned Lower A-Arms for the 82-92 Camaro/Firebird

Originally Posted by I H8 WWD
Now for 2" extended a-arms for us Driftnuts.

I believe we talked with BMR who said the Gen1-2? Camaro a-arms are 2" longer and almost everything is the same minus the spring perch.

Nice work nonetheless UMI.
thank you!

I have never seen a 2" longer BMR a-arm?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jbates346
Suspension and Chassis
7
Oct 21, 2015 01:50 PM
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
5
Oct 19, 2015 09:27 AM
92projectcamaro
Suspension and Chassis
10
Sep 24, 2015 08:09 AM
jerflash
Interior Parts for Sale
3
Sep 23, 2015 09:21 AM
jerflash
Interior Parts for Sale
4
Sep 22, 2015 09:59 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.