Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

UMI weight Jack failures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2021 | 10:54 PM
  #1  
McLovin1181's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 387
Likes: 141
UMI weight Jack failures

I wanted to record 2 failures I've had with UMI's weight jacks as a warning to other racers who might want to use them.
this isn't a Mudslinging thread but rather a PSA on issues I had with my UMI front weight jacks.
I've used these weight-jacks for 2 autocross seasons, usually 3 events a month
2019 I used 1050/200 springs
2020 I used 1200/400 springs.

Issues:
1. wobbly thrust bearing (see video)
the washers used have a smaller I.D and won't allow the thrust bearings to be tightened further, eventually like mine, they started clunking and wobbling.
the rear jacks wobble in the same way and make a TON of noise, but I don't have a tool to reach the nut on the rear jacks.
since i'm converting to PENSKE coil-overs, i'll leave the rear jacks as is

2. A bent bottom plate with a cracking weld---
somewhere along the line UMI changed the weight jack metal thicknesses from 1/4in to a thinner 3/16in
and stopped welding 100% of the circumference. The weight-jacks are now thinner with just 2 stitch welds.
Over time the area between the welds were bending and peeling away at the 2 stitch welds.
This was primarily on the front driver side weight-jack
The passenger weight-jack was bent a little but not enough to start cracking welds.
I forgot to take pic of the damaged driver side weight-Jack and I had already welded up the cracking/gap
pic is the non damaged passenger side for reference

the fix was welding 2 more stitch welds to the jacks where UMI excluded them
a few minutes and a TIG welder made short work of it
my brother media blasted them and a few coats of POR-15 chassis paint brought them back to life.

so if you are an avid racer, make sure to keep this in consideration as a possible inspection point for failure
i'm gonna try to make some Billet weight-jacks of my own design to avoid any further potential issues

2 stitch welds instead of the 4 it needs

This is the undamaged passenger side, but this is where the split was happening.

Extra 2 stitch welds added for a total of 4

Blasted after welding

POR-15 Chassis paint and they are good as new

before blasting a quick TIG fillet weld with mild steel filler wire


Billet 6061 Aluminum Prototype

3d printed, still need changes
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2021 | 09:09 AM
  #2  
scooter's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

This doesn't actually surprise me, for a while UMI had severe undercut on their welding.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2021 | 07:52 PM
  #3  
McLovin1181's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 387
Likes: 141
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

I got a lot of flack when I posted this on some of the Facebook pages.
mostly from UMI sponsors like TOM (guy with the nice red TransAm)
they claimed I was just "too had" on parts and how it was my fault.
They said they had done 1,000's of race miles without issue, But, I think the UMI parts they got were before the cost cutting was started.
for $400 for the front kit, I kinda expected better
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2021 | 03:56 AM
  #4  
IROCZ1989's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 66
From: MA
Car: 1989 IrocZ
Engine: 421 Dart Stroker
Transmission: 4L60E Cahall Performance Built
Axle/Gears: Midwest Chassis Fab 9/ 3.55 gears
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by McLovin1181
I got a lot of flack when I posted this on some of the Facebook pages.
mostly from UMI sponsors like TOM (guy with the nice red TransAm)
they claimed I was just "too had" on parts and how it was my fault.
They said they had done 1,000's of race miles without issue, But, I think the UMI parts they got were before the cost cutting was started.
for $400 for the front kit, I kinda expected better
Are you surprised by the UMI shills? Sure they had done 1000s of miles racing no issues. Bet their def of racing is alot dif than yours.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2021 | 06:53 AM
  #5  
obeymybird's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 55
From: PA
Car: 92 camaro RS
Engine: LSA
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: TNT 8.8 wavetrac 3.31
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by IROCZ1989
Are you surprised by the UMI shills? Sure they had done 1000s of miles racing no issues. Bet their def of racing is alot dif than yours.
Yea they test their stuff harder I have seen it first hand. I been and toured their shop seen the cars they built and seen them run laps on their race track my wife even got to go out for a ride along in there amazing second gen. I cant say enough for the amazing people at UMI.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2021 | 03:21 PM
  #6  
alan91z28's Avatar
COTM Editor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 214
From: PA
Car: 91/89/85/82 Z28s, 88 TA, 88/88 SC
Engine: SBC and LS variations
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

This is certainly disappointing... I have DSE weight jacks on one of my IROCs and they have been great, but i did need to do a modification to the UMI K - member spring perch to add an anti-rotation feature.

I have the UMI front spring jacks on two of my other camaros. I went this route once they introduced their set as it eliminated the need to modify the spring perch... I haven't had any issues to date, but I haven't been racing those IROCs either.

I generally really like UMI components and I have had very good luck with discussing things with them.

Obviously none of us are perfect, hopefully UMI is aware of this issue and will be correcting it... McLovin1181 have you directly contacted UMI about this and your experience?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2021 | 04:54 PM
  #7  
88RS's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 239
Likes: 35
Car: 91 z28
Engine: 305 tpi
Transmission: t5
Axle/Gears: lt1 10 bolt 3.23
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by obeymybird
Yea they test their stuff harder I have seen it first hand. I been and toured their shop seen the cars they built and seen them run laps on their race track my wife even got to go out for a ride along in there amazing second gen. I cant say enough for the amazing people at UMI.
Seems to me they didn't shake these down hard enough.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2021 | 03:34 PM
  #8  
obeymybird's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 55
From: PA
Car: 92 camaro RS
Engine: LSA
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: TNT 8.8 wavetrac 3.31
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by 88RS
Seems to me they didn't shake these down hard enough.
No failure with my UMI weight jacks same with many others I know so maybe the higher spring rate is past the safe zone
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2021 | 09:41 AM
  #9  
WTR388's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 746
Likes: 24
From: Atlantic Canada
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

For the price of these things they should be perfect and last... There really isn't much $ involved in the material to build the perch or the jack bolt.
I'll be building my own set if I'm not happy with what I'm trying this year.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2021 | 01:54 PM
  #10  
UMI Sales's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 30
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

We actually take note of any feedback we get. Sometimes that feedback is discrete and sometimes it causes a stir. No matter what, we always strive to improve.

ramey
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2021 | 02:39 PM
  #11  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 90
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Huh, I'm trying to figure out why that thrust bearing is necessary in there...

As far as UMI goes I still consider them one of the better builders for our cars. Yes, you had failures, but that's the thing with "racecar parts" used in racing, sometimes even the best-designed ones only show problems when they're pushed hard. I've found flaws with their manufacturing process, literally YEARS after originally purchasing the product and Ramey from UMI (he's a member here) took care of it and replaced the part. I don't know if you've tried contacting them about your issue, but they are very responsive to problems with their products and as far as I can tell their customer support is second to none.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2021 | 02:44 PM
  #12  
UMI Sales's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 30
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by 83 Crossfire TA
Huh, I'm trying to figure out why that thrust bearing is necessary in there...

As far as UMI goes I still consider them one of the better builders for our cars. Yes, you had failures, but that's the thing with "racecar parts" used in racing, sometimes even the best-designed ones only show problems when they're pushed hard. I've found flaws with their manufacturing process, literally YEARS after originally purchasing the product and Ramey from UMI (he's a member here) took care of it and replaced the part. I don't know if you've tried contacting them about your issue, but they are very responsive to problems with their products and as far as I can tell their customer support is second to none.
Hi Mark.

It's me. I'm still here.

The thrust bearing is for less friction when raising or lowering the car. It may not be as necessary as when using an aluminum shock but still makes for a nicer adjustment.

The OP has contacted us.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2021 | 03:13 PM
  #13  
t/aws61985's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 149
From: Chicago
Car: 85-6 TA 85 IROC 82-86 MSE 83 Pace
Engine: Slow ones
Transmission: Noisy ones
Axle/Gears: Weak ones
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Ground Control Made these weight jacks before UMI. On the outside they are identical to the ground control kits. Been runing mine for about 4ish years now. No issues, and I drive the car hard. Honestly sad to see a decline of quility from UMI. But Im sure they will fix this, and it looks like they owe you something if they plan to copy your Billet Design. Still would take anything from them over others Like Spohn (Dont get me started on them). When it comes to all these companies, they all piggy back off each other. UMI Copies this company, Founders copies them, and so on.

https://groundcontrolstore.com/colle...rd-weight-jack

Reply
Old Jan 19, 2021 | 03:24 PM
  #14  
UMI Sales's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 745
Likes: 30
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Since these threads live forever, it's important to note there was no "decline in quality" and our design was clean sheet. Just because a company introduces weight jacks doesn't mean they're a copy. As a matter of fact our engineer is adamant about not researching other companies designs. A weight jack has to have a plate and a screw.

We have no interest in the OP's billet design.

If first design parts were always perfect there would be no improvement and we would all be driving Model A's.

ramey
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2021 | 03:36 PM
  #15  
alan91z28's Avatar
COTM Editor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 214
From: PA
Car: 91/89/85/82 Z28s, 88 TA, 88/88 SC
Engine: SBC and LS variations
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by UMI Sales
Since these threads live forever, it's important to note there was no "decline in quality" and our design was clean sheet. Just because a company introduces weight jacks doesn't mean they're a copy. As a matter of fact our engineer is adamant about not researching other companies designs. A weight jack has to have a plate and a screw.

We have no interest in the OP's billet design.

If first design parts were always perfect there would be no improvement and we would all be driving Model A's.

ramey
thanks for being responsive and participating in the discussion of this topic. while people may still have different views and can choose their preferred preference for their project, it is helpful to have UMI comment on products and take the end users feedback good/bad. this is helpful for everyone
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2021 | 05:58 PM
  #16  
obeymybird's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 55
From: PA
Car: 92 camaro RS
Engine: LSA
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: TNT 8.8 wavetrac 3.31
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by t/aws61985
Ground Control Made these weight jacks before UMI. On the outside they are identical to the ground control kits. Been runing mine for about 4ish years now. No issues, and I drive the car hard. Honestly sad to see a decline of quility from UMI. But Im sure they will fix this, and it looks like they owe you something if they plan to copy your Billet Design. Still would take anything from them over others Like Spohn (Dont get me started on them). When it comes to all these companies, they all piggy back off each other. UMI Copies this company, Founders copies them, and so on.

https://groundcontrolstore.com/colle...rd-weight-jack
Your a funny guy sounds like you seem to think ground control weight jacks have never failed. If im on the right path UMI came out with their w/j cause of a weak setup from ground control in the first place.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2021 | 03:50 AM
  #17  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 90
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by UMI Sales
Hi Mark.

It's me. I'm still here.

The thrust bearing is for less friction when raising or lowering the car. It may not be as necessary as when using an aluminum shock but still makes for a nicer adjustment.

The OP has contacted us.
LOL, I guess you and I were both replying at the same time and you beat me too it...
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2021 | 11:32 AM
  #18  
midnightfirews6's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 402
Likes: 13
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1984 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by obeymybird
Your a funny guy sounds like you seem to think ground control weight jacks have never failed. If im on the right path UMI came out with their w/j cause of a weak setup from ground control in the first place.
Yup. I drove on the GC kit for one summer and had issues with plate bending, and one of the screws that held the threaded rod to the top plate came pretty loose at one point. It never truly failed, but it made me uncomfortable and I bought the UMI kit in November 2017 because the description explicitly mentions that they're designed to resist bending. I've put at least 11,000 miles on them with 2 road course days, a couple long road trips, and some hard runs at the tail of the dragon and haven't noticed any noises or other issues. I'm on 1050# springs. I'll pull them the next time I do a brake job though and report back. OP, when were yours purchased and how many total miles were on them at the point that you noticed issues?

​​​​​https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...ight-jack.html

​​​​​​I don't know that any of the 3 major front weight jack options has truly failed, but the amount of bending on the GC plates kept me up at night.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2023 | 02:15 PM
  #19  
SbFormula's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 192
From: Canada
Car: '18 Chev Camaro SS 1LE
Engine: LT1 6.2L
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.91
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Just installed the UMI 2065-1-B. They actually fit on the Spohn Performance front A-Arms #732 (discontinued - newer style is #782, would probably fit as the UMI spring is same diameter as stock). I still have OEM crossmember. Kept the spring isolators to sit the UMI weight jacks. They are a breeze to install. No need for spring compressor to install, just set them a lowest setting.

The weld issue mentioned in this thread is fixed. They are welded all around. Not much wobble, by design they have to be a bit loose to allow turning of adjusting screw. Will monitor and report back if any issue.

I would highly recommend those over Eibach Pro kit if one wants to lower their ride. The adjustment is awesome.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2023 | 02:38 PM
  #20  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,740
Likes: 551
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by SbFormula
Just installed the UMI 2065-1-B. They actually fit on the Spohn Performance front A-Arms #732 (discontinued - newer style is #782, would probably fit as the UMI spring is same diameter as stock). I still have OEM crossmember. Kept the spring isolators to sit the UMI weight jacks. They are a breeze to install. No need for spring compressor to install, just set them a lowest setting.

The weld issue mentioned in this thread is fixed. They are welded all around. Not much wobble, by design they have to be a bit loose to allow turning of adjusting screw. Will monitor and report back if any issue.

I would highly recommend those over Eibach Pro kit if one wants to lower their ride. The adjustment is awesome.
The only problem I have is ride quality. They are firm and beat the heck out of you. In addition, if you jack the front of the car high enough they can pop out of the perch and get bound up.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2023 | 02:51 PM
  #21  
SbFormula's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 192
From: Canada
Car: '18 Chev Camaro SS 1LE
Engine: LT1 6.2L
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.91
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by ShiftyCapone
The only problem I have is ride quality. They are firm and beat the heck out of you. In addition, if you jack the front of the car high enough they can pop out of the perch and get bound up.
What spring rate are you talking about? 850 or 1050 lb/in?

I can't see how "they can pop out of the perch and get bound up". I could visualize a catastrophic failure of the jack screw if fully extended that would lead to the spring flying out or getting jammed sideways or something like that. If you could describe it better, maybe I could visualize it. Thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2023 | 07:06 AM
  #22  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,740
Likes: 551
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by SbFormula
What spring rate are you talking about? 850 or 1050 lb/in?

I can't see how "they can pop out of the perch and get bound up". I could visualize a catastrophic failure of the jack screw if fully extended that would lead to the spring flying out or getting jammed sideways or something like that. If you could describe it better, maybe I could visualize it. Thanks.
I had to jack the front of the car up and the front wheel sagged so low the weight jack assembly unseated itself so that when I lowered the car off the jack it didn't sit back down in the A -arm. Not really a big deal, but was annoying to take the wheel off, jack the car and lower the strut to get it back in the perch. I just avoid letting the front end sag that low without something under the front tire. I have the 850 lb'ers.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2023 | 09:22 AM
  #23  
SbFormula's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 192
From: Canada
Car: '18 Chev Camaro SS 1LE
Engine: LT1 6.2L
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.91
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by ShiftyCapone
I had to jack the front of the car up and the front wheel sagged so low the weight jack assembly unseated itself so that when I lowered the car off the jack it didn't sit back down in the A -arm. Not really a big deal, but was annoying to take the wheel off, jack the car and lower the strut to get it back in the perch. I just avoid letting the front end sag that low without something under the front tire. I have the 850 lb'ers.
Ahhh I see. Thought you were talking about "while driving". Yep, if you lower them to a certain point, when you jack the car up and suspension hangs, they might become unstable and move. Will post back on ride quality with my set-up once I get on the road. I have Koni yellow, Spohn A-Arm, stock sway bar, full poly bushings and just a bit lower than ride height (lowering created too many issues). Koni yellow really helped ride quality. UMI 850s should be stiffer than Eibach Prokit.

Last edited by SbFormula; Feb 15, 2023 at 09:29 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2023 | 09:11 PM
  #24  
obeymybird's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 55
From: PA
Car: 92 camaro RS
Engine: LSA
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: TNT 8.8 wavetrac 3.31
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

I got 850s and my car rides like a dream.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2023 | 12:02 AM
  #25  
QwkTrip's Avatar
COTM Editor
20 Year Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,396
Likes: 2,067
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

My front suspension doesn't have enough droop that the weight jacks will unseat. The rear does though. I ended up ordering custom springs for the rear that were longer to fix that.

The shorter rear springs that came with the weight jack kit would literally drop out of the car if the axle dropped. Now I have to compress the rear springs very slightly to get in/out of the car. I can do it by hand and I think most average people could but maybe half the people out there would need a compressor tool.

Last edited by QwkTrip; Feb 16, 2023 at 12:16 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2023 | 02:43 AM
  #26  
t/aws61985's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 149
From: Chicago
Car: 85-6 TA 85 IROC 82-86 MSE 83 Pace
Engine: Slow ones
Transmission: Noisy ones
Axle/Gears: Weak ones
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by QwkTrip
My front suspension doesn't have enough droop that the weight jacks will unseat. The rear does though. I ended up ordering custom springs for the rear that were longer to fix that.

The shorter rear springs that came with the weight jack kit would literally drop out of the car if the axle dropped. Now I have to compress the rear springs very slightly to get in/out of the car. I can do it by hand and I think most average people could but maybe half the people out there would need a compressor tool.

Bro just copy what Mecham racing did in the 1980s with the Droop limiters I have a set on my 86 TA with the Original Ground control weight jacks. Keeps the rear from traveling
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2023 | 02:45 AM
  #27  
t/aws61985's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 621
Likes: 149
From: Chicago
Car: 85-6 TA 85 IROC 82-86 MSE 83 Pace
Engine: Slow ones
Transmission: Noisy ones
Axle/Gears: Weak ones
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

From the 1982 MSE press release. See the braided cable. They work fantastic

Reply
Old Feb 17, 2023 | 07:01 PM
  #28  
86blackiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 105
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by t/aws61985
Bro just copy what Mecham racing did in the 1980s with the Droop limiters I have a set on my 86 TA with the Original Ground control weight jacks. Keeps the rear from traveling
Nylon limiting straps are often used in the offroad world, it would work well for this application too.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2023 | 03:00 PM
  #29  
SbFormula's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 192
From: Canada
Car: '18 Chev Camaro SS 1LE
Engine: LT1 6.2L
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.91
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by SbFormula
Will post back on ride quality with my set-up once I get on the road. I have Koni yellow, Spohn A-Arm, stock sway bar, full poly bushings and just a bit lower than ride height (lowering created too many issues). Koni yellow really helped ride quality. UMI 850s should be stiffer than Eibach Prokit.
Ride quality has not changed! No rattle or anything. Same as it was with Eibach. I lifted the ride height 1/2in on driver's side and 3/4in on Passenger side. This really helped with clearance and it got the u-joint under 3* working angle. Very happy with this for street use. Gotta think twice before lowering a street car.

Last edited by SbFormula; Mar 27, 2023 at 06:05 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2023 | 06:04 PM
  #30  
91banditt2's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 151
From: Cincinnati,Ohio
Car: 1991 BandittII Firebird
Engine: 5.7 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Re: UMI weight Jack failures


Using 8” tall rear springs on weight jacks I needed limiting straps so they don’t pop out at full droop.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2023 | 07:48 PM
  #31  
McLovin1181's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 387
Likes: 141
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Went to do my yearly Suspension maintenance check.
and found this.
These weight jacks are like a gift that keeps on giving.

-Mod washers and -re torque bearings.
-Then have to Re-Weld the inside of the jack.
-And now coat the 1in-8 threaded rod in red locktight and hope the lock nut doesn't loosen again.

I really need to finalize my Billet weight jack design.
Maybe I can find some aerospace 6AL-4V titanium scrap to use


Reply
Old Apr 11, 2023 | 08:03 PM
  #32  
alan91z28's Avatar
COTM Editor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 214
From: PA
Car: 91/89/85/82 Z28s, 88 TA, 88/88 SC
Engine: SBC and LS variations
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

i don't know what k member you have, but i noticed this new weight jack integrated spring perch that they now have for use with their weight jack... it eliminates one of the components... i had the same UMI weight jack kit on my camaro that blew its ramjet so while swapping that out this winter i changed to this weight jack arrangement as i have their k-member... i haven't had the same issues to date that you have had with the original design, but i liked the way this new design better so i switched... haven't driven it yet
'

https://www.umiperformance.com/home/...-with-springs/
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2023 | 08:27 AM
  #33  
Beater79TA's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 991
Likes: 24
From: Peoria, AZ
Re: UMI weight Jack failures

Originally Posted by McLovin1181
Went to do my yearly Suspension maintenance check.
and found this.
These weight jacks are like a gift that keeps on giving.

-Mod washers and -re torque bearings.
-Then have to Re-Weld the inside of the jack.
-And now coat the 1in-8 threaded rod in red locktight and hope the lock nut doesn't loosen again.

I really need to finalize my Billet weight jack design.
Maybe I can find some aerospace 6AL-4V titanium scrap to use
Still not sure what you're doing to these that no one else is to bust them up this bad. We've had ours on the car since the part was introduced after breaking the Ground Control units. We've put close to 4000 autocross laps, 2000 road course miles, and another 8000 street miles on the car since then and nothing has broken or shown any damage on the weight jacks. This is in a 3800 lb car with 1100 lb front springs and a 315/30/18 tire.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FormulasOnly
Aftermarket Product Review
12
Nov 6, 2024 05:02 PM
IROCZman15
Suspension and Chassis
30
Oct 2, 2019 09:07 AM
BrianChevy
Fabrication
10
Feb 11, 2015 01:39 PM
Gearhead559
Fabrication
8
Oct 6, 2008 10:15 PM
5speed
Aftermarket Product Review
34
Jan 14, 2007 01:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.