ecm swap?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
ecm swap?
i was talking to jim at ccs motorsports yesterday about chip burning.
in the conversation, he said i'd be much better off swapping over to an ecm from a late model tbi pickup. he said the communication rate on that computer was much faster and it would increase tunability, that the difference between the two was something like 6 pages of code in my ecm and 60 pages of code in the late model ecm.
does anyone know anything about this?
in the conversation, he said i'd be much better off swapping over to an ecm from a late model tbi pickup. he said the communication rate on that computer was much faster and it would increase tunability, that the difference between the two was something like 6 pages of code in my ecm and 60 pages of code in the late model ecm.
does anyone know anything about this?
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
Car: '92 droptop bird
Engine: 5.7L,mild cam etc.
Transmission: modded 700r4 w/2600
you know what,i think he may have a good point,i had an 88 tbi 305/700r4 from my neighbor,she purchased new after her divorce i bought it and did a much needed tune up,i went to the track with it and out of the 6 lo3s my 88 was the fastest stone stock with 3.08s at sea level it ran consistant 15.20 and the others ran from 15.8s-17.20s the other cars were 89-92s with mods,so i got on the band wagon,hedders,ex.,3.42s,ported tbi,5.7injectors next trip it ran 14.70s,blown trans(107,000mi.)fresh 700 w/2500 stall w/jet stage 3 custom chip 14.30s.the other guys followed my mods and still could not out run my lil RS,nor did i get any faster but i was still way ahead of the pack..i realize its a car ecu but there is a difference with the 88 ecu's,i put my ecu in my freinds 89 RS and his car picked up 4tenths,so he went and purchased one and got the same chip as me then we would be nearly even who ever left the best won the race..........there is a difference with those ecu's
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Could you tell me what BCC chip that is and if possible, could you send me a spare ecm to test on my ecu bench? I've got lockers up and running and it would be really nice to actually compare the bins and see exactly what is going on during PE.
I'm reluctant to change my ecm for obvious reasons but I know there are code changes, I just wasn't aware of a hack released for the 88 ecm. If there is please let me know where I can find it.
Thanks for the heads up and maybe if other people get similar results we can conclude that stock, the 88's have a better chip/code for modded L03's. If the gains are as large as you suggest I'm excited.
I'm reluctant to change my ecm for obvious reasons but I know there are code changes, I just wasn't aware of a hack released for the 88 ecm. If there is please let me know where I can find it.
Thanks for the heads up and maybe if other people get similar results we can conclude that stock, the 88's have a better chip/code for modded L03's. If the gains are as large as you suggest I'm excited.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Noone's actually addressed the question of a 92+ TBI ECU tho.. could you talk to Jim and see what year/model trucks he's referring to, specifically? If they're OBD-II I wouldn't go near it, but a quick 8192 baud OBD-I swap wouldn't be bad... if the pinouts weren't drastic.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by TechSmurf
Noone's actually addressed the question of a 92+ TBI ECU tho.. could you talk to Jim and see what year/model trucks he's referring to, specifically? If they're OBD-II I wouldn't go near it, but a quick 8192 baud OBD-I swap wouldn't be bad... if the pinouts weren't drastic.
Noone's actually addressed the question of a 92+ TBI ECU tho.. could you talk to Jim and see what year/model trucks he's referring to, specifically? If they're OBD-II I wouldn't go near it, but a quick 8192 baud OBD-I swap wouldn't be bad... if the pinouts weren't drastic.
here's his site and number.
http://www.ccsmotorsport.com/index.htm
jim paschall: 512.829.0227
he's a nice guy and will take the time to talk to you.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 1
From: Morris, IL
Car: '91 t-top RS; '91 hrdtp Z28
Engine: LO3;383tpi
Transmission: 700r4;very nice 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 zt posi, 3.70 auburn
I believe there is a guy over on the 454ss board that has succesfully converted to a faster 7060 ecm, I would assume from a 7747. If this were the case, I would assume it would be possible to swap from the '89-'92 8647 as well. Though not near as simple as simply unplugging the harness and swapping in the ecm, it should definetely be worth it, the 160 baud rate of our ecms just plain sucks.
va454ss is also doing the swap and knows much more about it than I do, so hopefully he chimes in.
va454ss is also doing the swap and knows much more about it than I do, so hopefully he chimes in.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
I can't find *any* info on that ECU.. methinks it would be a good time to start posting links to relevant data.. man, 8192 baud is tempting....
Trending Topics
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: west michigan
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi
i hear the ecms out of the tpi cars are much faster than the tbi cars also. not sure though. but it looks like they can be had for under $50 on ebay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...&category=6763
btw, how hard is it to swap out a ecm?
-chuck
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...&category=6763
btw, how hard is it to swap out a ecm?
-chuck
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by ssxmac
i hear the ecms out of the tpi cars are much faster than the tbi cars also. not sure though. but it looks like they can be had for under $50 on ebay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...&category=6763
btw, how hard is it to swap out a ecm?
-chuck
i hear the ecms out of the tpi cars are much faster than the tbi cars also. not sure though. but it looks like they can be had for under $50 on ebay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...&category=6763
btw, how hard is it to swap out a ecm?
-chuck
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by JPrevost
I just wasn't aware of a hack released for the 88 ecm. If there is please let me know where I can find it.
Thanks for the heads up and maybe if other people get similar results we can conclude that stock, the 88's have a better chip/code for modded L03's. If the gains are as large as you suggest I'm excited.
I just wasn't aware of a hack released for the 88 ecm. If there is please let me know where I can find it.
Thanks for the heads up and maybe if other people get similar results we can conclude that stock, the 88's have a better chip/code for modded L03's. If the gains are as large as you suggest I'm excited.
AFAIK there doesnt seem too be too much difference between the 88 and the 89+ ecms. The 88 ecm is a bit short on code. Seems to be like the 8746 but missing a few things. The actual calibration might be better and it seems to adjust the blms in PE. Other then that its neary identicle to the 8746. Shares many of the same things. There is one nice thing, about it, no speed limiter. Its set to 255 mph in the calibration.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: west michigan
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi
Originally posted by seanof30306
i don't think a tpi ecm will work on a tbi car, at least not with the factory chip tuning. tpi fires 8 injectors, tbi fires only 2
i don't think a tpi ecm will work on a tbi car, at least not with the factory chip tuning. tpi fires 8 injectors, tbi fires only 2
-chuck
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
The TPI ecus still only have 2 injector drivers.. they bank fire 4 high-impedence injectors each which are wired in parallel. The prom tuning and wiring would be the real problem. Does anyone have pinouts+wire colors for the TPI speed density ECUs vs 8746/8063? What about the later truck TBI ecus, which I can still find nothing for info on...
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
The tpi only has one injector driver instead of two like the tbi ecms. The 749, on the other hand, has two and all the features of the tpi ecm but with one extra driver so it can be used on a tbi system. There are some differences in the way it does the injector firing, like I hear its bank fire instead of full batch. There are some threads on this very topic. Go do a search. When it gets warmer out I may go see if I can pick one up myself.
Hey everone, I think I found what we were looking for. Swapping a 7060pcm for our 8746ecm. Here's a link to a decusion on the 7060pcm by Mike at www.GMPCM.com on the 454ss board that I found very interesting. Go here. Tell me what you all think about it.
Steve
Steve
Last edited by steve8586iroc; Feb 2, 2004 at 12:27 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
I think we'll have some VSS issues.. but I think they can be overcome. Other than that, it looks like it may be a doable swap.
EDIT.. looked at some of the links on the GMPCM site.. haven't found any technical documentation on the 7060 yet.. however, I did discover that in 1986, the '2.0 L4 TBI “P” LQ5' application did use the 7165 (MAF TPI ECU).. perhaps we could snag usability of the 7165 or 7730 (MAP TPI ECU) ourselves... if we're going to open pandora's box, let's do it right, and make sure ALL the evil gets out this time... hope included. As long as it can yeild 8192 baud data, I want to be able to consider it an option.
8647 Pinout: http://www.cruzers.com/~ludis/1228746sheet4.gif
7730 Pinout: http://www.cruzers.com/~ludis/1227749sheet8.gif
Okay, I admit a crapload of tuning will be required.. but I think this is the case either way.
www.cruzers.com/~ludis lacks 7060 data.. we need to find this. We also need to find out the full advantages of switching ECMs. The ALDL data is nice, but higher resolution maps and tables would be great too, among other things which I know decidedly not enough about to even think of.
EDIT.. looked at some of the links on the GMPCM site.. haven't found any technical documentation on the 7060 yet.. however, I did discover that in 1986, the '2.0 L4 TBI “P” LQ5' application did use the 7165 (MAF TPI ECU).. perhaps we could snag usability of the 7165 or 7730 (MAP TPI ECU) ourselves... if we're going to open pandora's box, let's do it right, and make sure ALL the evil gets out this time... hope included. As long as it can yeild 8192 baud data, I want to be able to consider it an option.
8647 Pinout: http://www.cruzers.com/~ludis/1228746sheet4.gif
7730 Pinout: http://www.cruzers.com/~ludis/1227749sheet8.gif
Okay, I admit a crapload of tuning will be required.. but I think this is the case either way.
www.cruzers.com/~ludis lacks 7060 data.. we need to find this. We also need to find out the full advantages of switching ECMs. The ALDL data is nice, but higher resolution maps and tables would be great too, among other things which I know decidedly not enough about to even think of.
Last edited by TechSmurf; Feb 2, 2004 at 07:24 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
why not include the 749 as option for swaps, from what i can tell, with the injector driver from the quad 4 sunfires, it should run the TBI injectors just fine, the quad 4 uses 4 2.4ohm injectos.
the only thing i am not sure about is the firing scheme of the injectors. if it fires both at once, instead of alternating, would that cause some idle issues?
the only thing i am not sure about is the firing scheme of the injectors. if it fires both at once, instead of alternating, would that cause some idle issues?
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
what scanning software are these guys using? This sounds like a good idea. I'm sure the extra tranny controles could come in handy.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
AFAIK, the 7730 can only run one tbi injector. I was going to try one of the later tbi pcms in my truck so I could have tbi and still operate my 4WD 4L60-E but I dont have it anymore. Maybe ill do it with the camaro. Having an electronicly controlled trans could be interesting.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by dimented24x7
The tpi only has one injector driver instead of two like the tbi ecms.
The tpi only has one injector driver instead of two like the tbi ecms.
http://www.cruzers.com/~ludis/1227749sheet7.gif
And I'm still fairly certain they alternate firing.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
That's the 7749 ECM which Does have the extra injector driver but stock MAP TPI cars had a 7730 ECM which only has one.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by BronYrAur
That's the 7749 ECM which Does have the extra injector driver but stock MAP TPI cars had a 7730 ECM which only has one.
That's the 7749 ECM which Does have the extra injector driver but stock MAP TPI cars had a 7730 ECM which only has one.
Yes the '7749 is the one you want as far as ecms go. The '7730 wont work.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
good ***! this has turned into the diy-efi board. i haven't understood a word of the last 9 posts!!!!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
i really like the idea of having an algorithm to adjust the BPW as teh vacuum changes. Thats pretty sweet.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by dimented24x7
i really like the idea of having an algorithm to adjust the BPW as teh vacuum changes. Thats pretty sweet.
i really like the idea of having an algorithm to adjust the BPW as teh vacuum changes. Thats pretty sweet.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
I see.. so.. hmm.. and the 7749 is the Syclone ECU? great. So where's info on the 7060 again?
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
the 749 is in alot more than the syclone. if you get the whole setup out of a sy/ty, i beleive you have to change injector drivers to the ones that came in the sunfires. i beleive grumpy did this swap on a CFI car, years ago, i did some research on it a while back, and IIRC the quad4 applictions had the correct injector drivers for our cars.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by TechSmurf
I see.. so.. hmm.. and the 7749 is the Syclone ECU? great. So where's info on the 7060 again?
I see.. so.. hmm.. and the 7749 is the Syclone ECU? great. So where's info on the 7060 again?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






