Track times for freak of lo3
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
Track times for freak of lo3
dragstrip asked me to work for them this sunday so at the end of the night i asked to run my camaro.
times were done with stock aircleaner 2.73's wit a posi full interior plus an amp and half a tank of gas. takeoff was really crappy as it was my first time going down the track ever but im pretty satisfied.
reaction: .569. .000 light is perfect at 42, yes terrible i know.
60 ft .2.260
330ft 6.576
1/8 et 10.197
1/8 mph 66.45
1000 et 13.27
1/4 et 15.964
1/4 mph 84.93
assuming a perfect light i have a baseline of 15.395.
dont these cars usually start out iun like the 16's?
had almost no spin off the line due to my takeoff style which sucked, dude rushed me and i didnt figure out the optimal launching rpm.
going back to race this wensday or tuesday to perform more time trials and to try out an open element.
what doesnt really make sense is that the motor can do that well with the stock induction setup on top when these motors arent supposed to do that well anyways. cant wait to put the new airfilter on,, think ill see much of a difference?
times were done with stock aircleaner 2.73's wit a posi full interior plus an amp and half a tank of gas. takeoff was really crappy as it was my first time going down the track ever but im pretty satisfied.
reaction: .569. .000 light is perfect at 42, yes terrible i know.
60 ft .2.260
330ft 6.576
1/8 et 10.197
1/8 mph 66.45
1000 et 13.27
1/4 et 15.964
1/4 mph 84.93
assuming a perfect light i have a baseline of 15.395.
dont these cars usually start out iun like the 16's?
had almost no spin off the line due to my takeoff style which sucked, dude rushed me and i didnt figure out the optimal launching rpm.
going back to race this wensday or tuesday to perform more time trials and to try out an open element.
what doesnt really make sense is that the motor can do that well with the stock induction setup on top when these motors arent supposed to do that well anyways. cant wait to put the new airfilter on,, think ill see much of a difference?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Reaction time has nothing to do with your total ET. You can sit there for 4 minutes before you go and still run a 15.9 like you did. Your times seem on par with every car. Where in ohio did you run? Are you sure you have a posi? I doubt you do since I didn't think you could get it but I have been proven wrong before.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
for bracket racing? are you sure?
yes i have a posi i had it put in myself.
dragway 42 in west salem.
i've worked at that track for two years and half the time people there complain about their et's its because they didnt cut a good light and it screwed up their et.
yes i have a posi i had it put in myself.
dragway 42 in west salem.
i've worked at that track for two years and half the time people there complain about their et's its because they didnt cut a good light and it screwed up their et.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
this here is what we call a blow to the ego.15.9 vs 15.3, grrr.
think i could get a 10th out of an open element air cleaner?
that's allright this car doesnt have to be that fast. however when i get my lt4 powered nitrous enhanced 92 rs h.o. done,, it better move a tad quicker.
shifty what was this i heard u say about wanting to get rid of your car?
think i could get a 10th out of an open element air cleaner?
that's allright this car doesnt have to be that fast. however when i get my lt4 powered nitrous enhanced 92 rs h.o. done,, it better move a tad quicker.
shifty what was this i heard u say about wanting to get rid of your car?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Ann.racer92
yes i have a posi i had it put in myself.
yes i have a posi i had it put in myself.
EDIT: Who said I wanted to get rid of my car? Which car?
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
the gear swap is the hard part, putting in a posi is easy, slap her in, and set backlash.
when you do gears, you have to set the pinion depth, with is no fun, and can require you to press the pinon bearing on and off several times, to set the shims up properly.
when you do gears, you have to set the pinion depth, with is no fun, and can require you to press the pinon bearing on and off several times, to set the shims up properly.
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Dewey316
the gear swap is the hard part, putting in a posi is easy, slap her in, and set backlash.
when you do gears, you have to set the pinion depth, with is no fun, and can require you to press the pinon bearing on and off several times, to set the shims up properly.
the gear swap is the hard part, putting in a posi is easy, slap her in, and set backlash.
when you do gears, you have to set the pinion depth, with is no fun, and can require you to press the pinon bearing on and off several times, to set the shims up properly.
in there. Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Do you two know each other?
and with a name like ann.racer, i figured it was a female posting
and with a name like ann.racer, i figured it was a female posting
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Dewey316
Do you two know each other?
and with a name like ann.racer, i figured it was a female posting
Do you two know each other?
and with a name like ann.racer, i figured it was a female posting
The 95, maybe....the RS....NEVER! Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
hah, ann. is for anniversary. thank you very much.
im glad i have 2.73's i drive this car every day.
chris i was reffering to what you said in the last post about turboing a tbi, that you couldnt wait to get rid of it perhaps i was mistaken.
dude your other camaro is a 95? i have a 95 3.8 out here, you need any parts? its pretty screwed externaly ecpet the doors and hatch are fine, whats your car run in the quarter? the rs i mean
im glad i have 2.73's i drive this car every day.
chris i was reffering to what you said in the last post about turboing a tbi, that you couldnt wait to get rid of it perhaps i was mistaken.
dude your other camaro is a 95? i have a 95 3.8 out here, you need any parts? its pretty screwed externaly ecpet the doors and hatch are fine, whats your car run in the quarter? the rs i mean
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
i didnt clarify i am a dude. thpugh there is a chick wioth a 91 in my town that has a red leather outfit to match the red on the camaro,, ehhhhhhh....
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Ann.racer92
hah, ann. is for anniversary. thank you very much.
im glad i have 2.73's i drive this car every day.
chris i was reffering to what you said in the last post about turboing a tbi, that you couldnt wait to get rid of it perhaps i was mistaken.
dude your other camaro is a 95? i have a 95 3.8 out here, you need any parts? its pretty screwed externaly ecpet the doors and hatch are fine, whats your car run in the quarter? the rs i mean
hah, ann. is for anniversary. thank you very much.
im glad i have 2.73's i drive this car every day.
chris i was reffering to what you said in the last post about turboing a tbi, that you couldnt wait to get rid of it perhaps i was mistaken.
dude your other camaro is a 95? i have a 95 3.8 out here, you need any parts? its pretty screwed externaly ecpet the doors and hatch are fine, whats your car run in the quarter? the rs i mean
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Hockessin, Delaware
Car: Red 91 RS Camaro
Engine: LO3 with Comp Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen rear
Your time is pretty average for most LO3s. My times are in the sig and I'm going back to the track this wednesday hopefully bustin into the 14s.
Last edited by iggy1991; Aug 3, 2004 at 12:40 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
15.9 is definely good. Not GREAT, but good. Yeah, lots of em' start out in the 16's (and 17's, but most of them don't admit to it) so you got a good car. Don't know how well you take car of that car or when the last time you had a tune-up was but that could get you a few tenths right there! Anywho, keep us posted with whatever you do to break that 14 second mark...
Bruce (90RS305)
Bruce (90RS305)
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 89 formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: Stock 700r4
92 RS:
1st run: 18.34 (had the defroster on, forgot to turn it off)
2nd run: 17.9 (car was hot)
3rd run: 17.6 (car still hot)
4th run: 17.1 (car not as hot, but still finding best launch)
5th run: 16.9 (car cooled)
6th run: 16.7 (car was cool, but sat at the line after burnout
cause track was being cleaned)
7th run: 16.47 (car cool, took off stock airlid)
Best so far: 16.05 with a dynomax cat and catback, custom CAI, and free mods.
1st run: 18.34 (had the defroster on, forgot to turn it off)
2nd run: 17.9 (car was hot)
3rd run: 17.6 (car still hot)
4th run: 17.1 (car not as hot, but still finding best launch)
5th run: 16.9 (car cooled)
6th run: 16.7 (car was cool, but sat at the line after burnout
cause track was being cleaned)
7th run: 16.47 (car cool, took off stock airlid)
Best so far: 16.05 with a dynomax cat and catback, custom CAI, and free mods.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by 90RS305
15.9 is definely good. Not GREAT, but good. Yeah, lots of em' start out in the 16's (and 17's, but most of them don't admit to it) so you got a good car. Don't know how well you take car of that car or when the last time you had a tune-up was but that could get you a few tenths right there! Anywho, keep us posted with whatever you do to break that 14 second mark...
Bruce (90RS305)
15.9 is definely good. Not GREAT, but good. Yeah, lots of em' start out in the 16's (and 17's, but most of them don't admit to it) so you got a good car. Don't know how well you take car of that car or when the last time you had a tune-up was but that could get you a few tenths right there! Anywho, keep us posted with whatever you do to break that 14 second mark...
Bruce (90RS305)
then i remembered how the tach gets off on these cars... so i "overreved" it (manualy shifting the auto) and got low 16s.
lowest i got it stock was 16.00.. and with a at track weight of 3615lbs, thats not too bad.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
so im really not doing bad at all for it being my very first run considering. though my car was actually cooler then i would have liked, it ran for 3 minutes before the run. im thinking of putting an open element on it and possibly a shift kit, 700 r4 shifts too loose for me.
perhaps not a freak then, but a good day at the factory?
shifty you never said what your car runs dude.
perhaps not a freak then, but a good day at the factory?
shifty you never said what your car runs dude.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Newark, OH
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R-4
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
I have no idea who he/she is. I always raz the local ohio folk. I wonder who told them my car was forsale
The 95, maybe....the RS....NEVER!
I have no idea who he/she is. I always raz the local ohio folk. I wonder who told them my car was forsale
The 95, maybe....the RS....NEVER!
as it sits you dont even have to put it back together... bet its for sale now
jk manand nice numbers i really want to go to the track in the near future but dont know when i will get a chance... i want to see how the ol L03 scoots down the track...
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Ann.racer92
shifty you never said what your car runs dude.
shifty you never said what your car runs dude.

EDIT: Sounds like a test and tune night at national trials patrick
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Dewey316
body panels are overrated.
body panels are overrated.
i drove my car for 2 days without a hood...
i got ALOT of wierd looks...................................................
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Car: A Camaro
Engine: Weak
Transmission: Weaker
Haha, when I drove my with my hood off for a few months I felt like the biggest *******...I loved it!! So many people would look over and give me the look like "Ummm, you're missing something", made my day every time
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
wow. didnt know you wrecked it dude. you're at itt tech right? im thinking of going there after highschool. im taking autobody at the jvs right now maybe i could lend a hand, i did all my own body work for my black 92 and the red 92 is going in this year to get straightened out. ill sell you the black one it looks sweet and you could just transfer your stuff over to a straight car but i want your wrecked car after the performance stuff is off it and i need the interior, the red one is planned to have an lt4 (425 hp) dropped between the fenders and is my new project
! whaddya say bro?
! whaddya say bro? Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Winfield, IL
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350tpi comming soon!
Transmission: fixed the 700r4 again!
Originally posted by Dewey316
body panels are overrated.
body panels are overrated.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
Originally posted by Ann.racer92
for bracket racing? are you sure?
yes i have a posi i had it put in myself.
dragway 42 in west salem.
i've worked at that track for two years and half the time people there complain about their et's its because they didnt cut a good light and it screwed up their et.
for bracket racing? are you sure?
yes i have a posi i had it put in myself.
dragway 42 in west salem.
i've worked at that track for two years and half the time people there complain about their et's its because they didnt cut a good light and it screwed up their et.
your e.t. and your reaction time are two seperate issues.
the clock starts running when your car moves forward and un-breaks the two light beams at the starting line (to be precise, it starts when you un-break the second beam) and stops when you break the light beam at the finish line.
your reaction time is how much time elapses between your getting the green light and your un-breaking that second beam. the quicker your reaction time, the better your performance against the car in the other lane, but it has absolutely no effect on how long it takes you to get down the track. for example, if you were running against a car that ran the exact same time as yours and you both had the exact same reaction time, the race would end in a tie. rewind that, though, with both cars running the exact same time, but your cutting a better light (having a better reaction time) and you'd win because you essentially gave yourself a head start by leaving sooner (leave too soon, though, and you get the red light).
if you've been at the track that long, i'm sure you've seen the argument among bracket racers when a car loses AND breaks out. that means the other driver simply cut a much better light.
another thing that's terribly misunderstood is "deep staging". as you roll into the lights, your front tire breaks the first light beam, and the first yellow light comes on. as you continue to roll forward, your tire breaks the second beam, the second yellow light goes on and you're "staged". that second yellow light will stay on until the wheel rolls all the way through it and goes beyond. depending on your wheel size, the distance between when you first break the second light and when you've rolled all the way through it is around 12 inches. this is called rollout.
when a driver has a car that doesn't hook up very well and they want to improve their reaction times, some will roll further into the lights, sometimes rolling all the way through till the first light goes off. that's deep staging. this way, their car doesn't have to roll 12 inches or so before the second light goes off and the clock starts. this can improve reaction times, but it actually slows the car down a bit. when you stage shallowly, you get 12 inches of free rolling room before the clock starts. you essentially get a rolling start. even this little bit of rolling can add up to a couple of hundredths of a second in e.t.
as a rule of thumb, you deep stage for reaction time and shallow stage for e.t.
i am now through pontificating (for the moment, anyway)
Last edited by seanof30306; Aug 6, 2004 at 06:05 PM.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
okay, so considering it runs this well for what it is and that its almost completely bone stock since we've been looking at it more carefully, is it worth it to throw an open element on it and a full exhaust? i know that these cars in particular are unpredictable but,,,.
does anyone know the ,,, whats the name for it,, volumetric efficiancy is for these vs volumetric capability? i'de like to do the math before i take out the cash you know? like make a map of the airflow and figure out the weak points because all i really want out of this car is like a 15.2 without losing my gas mileage. once i can start chip tuning ill tinker with it and im going to switch to high test once its justifiable with mileage.
does anyone know the ,,, whats the name for it,, volumetric efficiancy is for these vs volumetric capability? i'de like to do the math before i take out the cash you know? like make a map of the airflow and figure out the weak points because all i really want out of this car is like a 15.2 without losing my gas mileage. once i can start chip tuning ill tinker with it and im going to switch to high test once its justifiable with mileage.
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Hockessin, Delaware
Car: Red 91 RS Camaro
Engine: LO3 with Comp Cam
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen rear
Freeing up the breathing and exhaust on this car will only help in the gas mileage department. More work is done by the same amount of gas since it doesn't have to fight to get in and out. But the gas mileage is adversably affected by your right foot and how your drive. With added performance your gonna want to use it more often.:lala:
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 92 Camaro Heritage RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
usualy just put it on cruise on the highway but otherwise yea i see your point.
actually i i have a disagreement, i dont see how freeing up the breathing will help fuel mileage because since we're not doing a "major" mod it will still take the same amount of air and fuel to make the same power just at a lower rpm, see what im saying?
actually i i have a disagreement, i dont see how freeing up the breathing will help fuel mileage because since we're not doing a "major" mod it will still take the same amount of air and fuel to make the same power just at a lower rpm, see what im saying?
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
You are missing a few things to take into account. 1 is how the computer deals with fueling at diffrent TPS values, and diffrent MAP values. You see, the computer adds more fuel, as load goes up. the more power available, the less load on the less fuel used.
You also have to take pumping loss into consideration, with a free flowing exaust, it lowers the pumping losses during an engine revolution. which = more power availble to the wheels = less load = less fuel = better milage.
--John
15.1@92mph
32mpg
headers.
You also have to take pumping loss into consideration, with a free flowing exaust, it lowers the pumping losses during an engine revolution. which = more power availble to the wheels = less load = less fuel = better milage.
--John
15.1@92mph
32mpg
headers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Power Adders
634
Apr 30, 2019 12:14 PM






