Do TBI cams have fuel pump eccentrics?
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Do TBI cams have fuel pump eccentrics?
My TA has a former TBI motor in place of its original 305 (carbureted), and I want to put the original type mechanical pump back on it if possible (it now has one of those universal electric pumps, installed by the previous owner). Does the TBI cam have a lobe to drive the fuel pump pushrod? I'm betting it does, but just wanted to check before I tear into it. Thanks guys!
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
The camshaft specs appear to be the same as one for an LG4 so that being I would imagine it has teh fuel pump eccentric as well. This assumes the specs Im looking at are accurate.
#5
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Originally posted by 25THRSS
I believe so, but I would stick with the electric pump to keep from wasting hp with a mechanical pump.
I believe so, but I would stick with the electric pump to keep from wasting hp with a mechanical pump.
IMO just stick to a good mechanical pump. I have a Carter on my Lg4 in my Caprice. The thing (pump) runs perfectly.
#6
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,207
Likes: 0
Received 375 Likes
on
288 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
All Gen I cams have a fuel pump lobe. That includes the LO3 cam as well. There is a pic of my LO3 cam in the LT1 cam install sticky that points out the lobe.
Trending Topics
#9
Supreme Member
Originally posted by Stekman
The gains/losses are minimal at best. Either or, your going to lose something. The pump pushrod has the friction on the cams eccentric, sure. The electric adds load to the alternator.
IMO just stick to a good mechanical pump. I have a Carter on my Lg4 in my Caprice. The thing (pump) runs perfectly.
The gains/losses are minimal at best. Either or, your going to lose something. The pump pushrod has the friction on the cams eccentric, sure. The electric adds load to the alternator.
IMO just stick to a good mechanical pump. I have a Carter on my Lg4 in my Caprice. The thing (pump) runs perfectly.
#10
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
When the cam lobes present more lift than the fuel pump "lobe", then I will consider it a viable reason to free up hp. Until then, the losses are still minimal. Especially when looking at the fact that it is on a TBI (presumably stock) engine.
Why downgrade? Don't ask me. I am merely giving my suggestion on the assumption that the original poster wants to convert to a mechanical.
Why downgrade? Don't ask me. I am merely giving my suggestion on the assumption that the original poster wants to convert to a mechanical.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by 25THRSS
The alternator won't work any harder with an electric pump, it will spin the exact same regardless. He already has an electric pump, so why downgrade to mechanical?
The alternator won't work any harder with an electric pump, it will spin the exact same regardless. He already has an electric pump, so why downgrade to mechanical?
I like mechanical fuel pumps because they are directly propertional. Engine revs high, needs more fuel flow, pump is pumping more fuel .
It just so happens that small in-tank electric pumps are by far the most economically priced for street machines but in a race car even with EFI I'd consider a belt driven fuel pump (only if I had the money to burn). But since mechanical pumps off the block for carbs are cheaper than electric pumps for EFI... go for it. It's a smart move.
#12
Supreme Member
I gained about 7 rwhp with an electric wp on the LS1. The engine isn't going to work any harder to power an electric fuel pump. It doesn't say, "damn I need to produce more amps so I have to strain myself even harder." It works the same regardless, but with a mechanical pump it must waste hp to turn the cam to push the pump. Friction and weight suck. Besides, amperage is a non issue above idle on pretty much any accessory even with underdrive pulleys.
#14
Supreme Member
Originally posted by dimented24x7
I think the power losses from each are negligable.
I think the power losses from each are negligable.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by 25THRSS
I gained about 7 rwhp with an electric wp on the LS1. The engine isn't going to work any harder to power an electric fuel pump. It doesn't say, "damn I need to produce more amps so I have to strain myself even harder." It works the same regardless, but with a mechanical pump it must waste hp to turn the cam to push the pump. Friction and weight suck. Besides, amperage is a non issue above idle on pretty much any accessory even with underdrive pulleys.
I gained about 7 rwhp with an electric wp on the LS1. The engine isn't going to work any harder to power an electric fuel pump. It doesn't say, "damn I need to produce more amps so I have to strain myself even harder." It works the same regardless, but with a mechanical pump it must waste hp to turn the cam to push the pump. Friction and weight suck. Besides, amperage is a non issue above idle on pretty much any accessory even with underdrive pulleys.
I would personally keep the electric pump for a daily driver. Having no vapor lock because of the return style system is always a good thing.
Gaining horsepower by removing the mechanical water pump isn't the same as a fuel pump like I said before. I can bet right now $1000 that I don't even have to bet that your electric water pump doesn't have nearly the same water flow rate as the stock LS1 mechanical pump. Hence reduced cooling capacity on the street and road racing. Hell, if you're only going down the 1/4 mile you're probably better off getting a damn spring and rigging it to supply 6psi of fuel pressure for only one 1/4 mile .
Look at all of the real racing pumps and you'll find mechanical pumps everywhere.
The good thing in this guys case is that the TBI pump is still an "efi" pump of sorts. This means that at the carb fuel pressure (lower) it'll flow a LOT more fuel to support way more horsepower than it could at TBI fuel pressure. I'm guessing the stock pump would be good for 400hp at 6psi.
#16
Supreme Member
My meziere electric wp flows 55 gallons per minute. I'll take that $1000 as a money order. Anyways, please explain to me how the engine has to work harder to produce more amperage? It will spin the alternator at the same exact speed regardless of which type of fuel pump you have. Like I said amperage is no issue above idle, even with underdrive pulleys.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Its not the speed, its the drag. When there is a load there is a torque that resists the engines rotation. The more current, the more drag there is and the more work the engine has to do to meet that load.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by 25THRSS
My meziere electric wp flows 55 gallons per minute. I'll take that $1000 as a money order. Anyways, please explain to me how the engine has to work harder to produce more amperage? It will spin the alternator at the same exact speed regardless of which type of fuel pump you have. Like I said amperage is no issue above idle, even with underdrive pulleys.
My meziere electric wp flows 55 gallons per minute. I'll take that $1000 as a money order. Anyways, please explain to me how the engine has to work harder to produce more amperage? It will spin the alternator at the same exact speed regardless of which type of fuel pump you have. Like I said amperage is no issue above idle, even with underdrive pulleys.
Stock chevy waterpumps flow 60gpm and stewart components pumps flow about 120gpm. I've had it blow off my upper radiator hose twice now! Belt driven pumps flow over 180gpm and are extreamely efficient. When can I recieve my $$$$. I accept paypal .
Oh, and just a heads up about the rating of electric water pumps (since I test a bunch of them)... they don't flow as much at they say they do because they aren't tested under pressure. Those ratings are usually free flowing to make you feel like it's sufficient. The instant you put an engine, radiator, and thermostat into the loop the pressure drop increases making it harder to pump resulting in higher amp draw and lower than rated flow.
The Meziere pump I tested was for a SBC at rated at 35gpm. With the upper radiator hose going into a bucket on a scale I reported 10amps at 13.6v and only 26gpm with the thermostat propped open. Granted if you've got a pump control circuit installed you can PWM the motor and run no thermostat resulting in again, 10amps of drag but a much higher 32gpm, still short of those damn ratings.
A stock Honda F4i 600cc motorcycle mechanical water pump flows more!!!
My point is don't go thinking just because it's electrical that it's freed up all kinds of horsepower. It's only moved it to a different kind. I'd go with an electric water pump on my car anyday if it wasn't daily driven so don't get the impression I'm biased. I just want to edjucate you and the rest of the thirdgen community about the differences.
About alternator drag, amperage is drag, drag as in costing your engine horsepower that would otherwise be put to accelerating the vehicle. If the alternator is having to support a large electrical load it is harder to spin! The only thing proportional to alternator speed is the horsepower needed to accelerate the internals. Ever pick up an alternator... it's not exactly light and the majority of that is having to be accelerated where in a mechanical water pump has just an impeller to accelerate.
I've done the math and my senior design for engineering was the cooling system on an FSAE car that had no cooling fans. The study took me 9 months so please don't argue.
Not that I need even more examples but look at the mechanical belt driven fuel pumps vs the electric fuel pumps.
#19
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by 25THRSS
probably right, you won't gain or lose any huge amount of power, but I was simply saying if you already have the electric, it doesn't make any sense to want to downgrade to mechanical.
probably right, you won't gain or lose any huge amount of power, but I was simply saying if you already have the electric, it doesn't make any sense to want to downgrade to mechanical.
#20
Supreme Member
I still don't understand how the alternator will be harder to turn. There is nothing that will make it harder to turn. The crank speed controls the alternator. Explain exactly how the alternator will become harder to turn? The LS1 gained 7 rear wheel hp with the addition of an electric pump only, not to mention I can cool the car in the staging lanes much better than a mechanic pump. I drive this car every day to work as well.
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Hmm... Easy way to explain it...
Lets see if I can explain it without getting it all wrong.
In order to induce a current to flow when there is a load on the alternator, a force must be exerted on the free electons in the coils contained in the alternator. This translates into a torque on the alternators input shaft. The larger the load and the more current that can flow, the more torque itll take to turn the alternator. Now, torque times angular velocity equals power. The more torque on the alternator, the more work that must be done by the motor at that speed to turn the alternator. After all, that power must come from somewhere. It jsut doesnt appear out of the sky. It comes from the engine being forced to turn the beltline in order to drive or idle. The reason it continues at the same speed is that either you have the accelerator pressed down or the computer is opening the IAC to maintain the proper idle speed.
A good example of beltline drag and parisitic loss is turning on the airconditioning in a crappy 4 banger. The engine has a harder time accelerating because it must do work in order to turn the A/C compressor and compress teh refrigerant. The same thing happens when a cooling fan or fans turn on and the rpms drop a little bit at idle. Its due to the current spike from the accesory turning on and further loading the alternator. The engine speed falls when it has to convert over some of its power to make electricity rather then use it to maintain the idle speed.
Lets see if I can explain it without getting it all wrong.
In order to induce a current to flow when there is a load on the alternator, a force must be exerted on the free electons in the coils contained in the alternator. This translates into a torque on the alternators input shaft. The larger the load and the more current that can flow, the more torque itll take to turn the alternator. Now, torque times angular velocity equals power. The more torque on the alternator, the more work that must be done by the motor at that speed to turn the alternator. After all, that power must come from somewhere. It jsut doesnt appear out of the sky. It comes from the engine being forced to turn the beltline in order to drive or idle. The reason it continues at the same speed is that either you have the accelerator pressed down or the computer is opening the IAC to maintain the proper idle speed.
A good example of beltline drag and parisitic loss is turning on the airconditioning in a crappy 4 banger. The engine has a harder time accelerating because it must do work in order to turn the A/C compressor and compress teh refrigerant. The same thing happens when a cooling fan or fans turn on and the rpms drop a little bit at idle. Its due to the current spike from the accesory turning on and further loading the alternator. The engine speed falls when it has to convert over some of its power to make electricity rather then use it to maintain the idle speed.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by 25THRSS
I still don't understand how the alternator will be harder to turn. There is nothing that will make it harder to turn. The crank speed controls the alternator. Explain exactly how the alternator will become harder to turn? The LS1 gained 7 rear wheel hp with the addition of an electric pump only, not to mention I can cool the car in the staging lanes much better than a mechanic pump. I drive this car every day to work as well.
I still don't understand how the alternator will be harder to turn. There is nothing that will make it harder to turn. The crank speed controls the alternator. Explain exactly how the alternator will become harder to turn? The LS1 gained 7 rear wheel hp with the addition of an electric pump only, not to mention I can cool the car in the staging lanes much better than a mechanic pump. I drive this car every day to work as well.
This isnt a problem with an electric motor as it jsut operates at one speed. This can be a disadvantage, however, because at high engine speeds a mechanical pump may be able to circulate more coolant then an electric can.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
This reminds me.
Way back when I remember seeing an article on one of those dB drag competition vehicles that was stuffed with subwoofers and amps. The thing could generate sound levels something like around 180 dB.
Anyway, it was an Astro van with a slightly modded 4.3L that had been fitted with bullet proof glass, heavy duty seals, lots of other crap and something like 4 or 5 chain driven alternators to power all the amplifiers. When the sound system was going at full blast, they had to run the motor at WOT just to generate enough power to run everything. The power used was something on the order of 170 HP, or around 126 kW, which was jsut about the peak power output of the motor. Now, if thats not proof that it takes power to turn an alternator, I dont know what is
Way back when I remember seeing an article on one of those dB drag competition vehicles that was stuffed with subwoofers and amps. The thing could generate sound levels something like around 180 dB.
Anyway, it was an Astro van with a slightly modded 4.3L that had been fitted with bullet proof glass, heavy duty seals, lots of other crap and something like 4 or 5 chain driven alternators to power all the amplifiers. When the sound system was going at full blast, they had to run the motor at WOT just to generate enough power to run everything. The power used was something on the order of 170 HP, or around 126 kW, which was jsut about the peak power output of the motor. Now, if thats not proof that it takes power to turn an alternator, I dont know what is
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by 25THRSS
I still don't understand how the alternator will be harder to turn. There is nothing that will make it harder to turn. The crank speed controls the alternator. Explain exactly how the alternator will become harder to turn? The LS1 gained 7 rear wheel hp with the addition of an electric pump only, not to mention I can cool the car in the staging lanes much better than a mechanic pump. I drive this car every day to work as well.
I still don't understand how the alternator will be harder to turn. There is nothing that will make it harder to turn. The crank speed controls the alternator. Explain exactly how the alternator will become harder to turn? The LS1 gained 7 rear wheel hp with the addition of an electric pump only, not to mention I can cool the car in the staging lanes much better than a mechanic pump. I drive this car every day to work as well.
Also like I was trying to say, for drag racing an electric pump is good, road racing and high revs it's bad. For a really mild street driven car it can work well too because it flows a constant rate unlike a mechanical pump. The LS1 gained rear wheel horsepower at peak power but it lost power at lower engine speeds. This is because the electric motor is drawing a constant amount of power completely independant of the engine speed. I like mechanical pumps for street and many forms of racing, drag racing and low mile street cars could use an electric water pump. For a carb, the fuel delivery is proportional to engine speed (faster the engine, faster the pump) this is a good think with a carb and EFI. Expensive electric fuel pump controllers use pulse width modulation to control the fuel flow so as not to draw excesive power at lower engine speeds!
#25
Supreme Member
Originally posted by JPrevost
The LS1 gained rear wheel horsepower at peak power but it lost power at lower engine speeds. This is because the electric motor is drawing a constant amount of power completely independant of the engine speed. I like mechanical pumps for street and many forms of racing, drag racing and low mile street cars could use an electric water pump.
The LS1 gained rear wheel horsepower at peak power but it lost power at lower engine speeds. This is because the electric motor is drawing a constant amount of power completely independant of the engine speed. I like mechanical pumps for street and many forms of racing, drag racing and low mile street cars could use an electric water pump.
Last edited by 25THRSS; 10-26-2004 at 09:59 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evilstuie
Tech / General Engine
22
01-09-2020 08:29 PM
beachrodder
Tech / General Engine
7
08-25-2015 08:05 AM
92camaroJoe
Tech / General Engine
6
08-13-2015 06:07 AM