TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2007, 11:21 AM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
xjcamaro89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 Holley TBI Personally Tuned
Transmission: 5 Speed
Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

OK, i have a 350 TBI Tuned camaro. i have readily access to 110+ octane racing fuel, would it be safe to run it in my engine, and what changes would i need to make to let it run correctly? example, spark plugs, and extra tuning. I understand that if i started running a racing fuel setup that i would have to keep running it until i changed everything back. Also the big question, would it be worth it? Would i see any gains anywhere? Thanks for the input guys.
Old 05-23-2007, 01:19 PM
  #2  
Member
 
pizza_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kansas, where the wind howls
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28 H.O. w/Megasquirt II
Engine: semi-stock L69
Transmission: T-5 non W/C
Axle/Gears: 3.73 open
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

Unless running boost or really high compression, it's a waste of money IMO.

On a stockish street motor without the above mentioned variables, it's like using a sledgehammer to kill a fly.

If your really determined too, your timing map will need to be reworked, and I still doubt you'd gain anything after all that work.
Old 05-23-2007, 03:29 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (25)
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

Originally Posted by pizza_guy
Unless running boost or really high compression, it's a waste of money IMO.

On a stockish street motor without the above mentioned variables, it's like using a sledgehammer to kill a fly.

If your really determined too, your timing map will need to be reworked, and I still doubt you'd gain anything after all that work.

yup.
Old 05-23-2007, 04:35 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

 
BMmonteSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

Octane rating of fuel is basically the resistance to ignition that the fuel has. So what happens is that 110 octane will take much more energy to light off than say 87 octane. What this allows you to do is squeeze the fuel much more before it will pre-ignite at the wrong time. Since your engine is already built there is no way to alter the compression.

If you are able to get the timing that allows you max power without detonation then you have nothing to gain from race fuel. Lets just say you make max power at 34 deg of timing, but you start getting a lot of knock counts at around 32 deg of timing. Then racefuel would benefit you because it will allow you to set your timing at 34 degrees. In the real world this rarely is the case unless you are running well over 10-1 compression.


In short, nope not worth it at all.
Old 05-23-2007, 04:55 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: A Camaro
Engine: Weak
Transmission: Weaker
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

Originally Posted by BMmonteSS
If you are able to get the timing that allows you max power without detonation then you have nothing to gain from race fuel. Lets just say you make max power at 34 deg of timing, but you start getting a lot of knock counts at around 32 deg of timing. Then racefuel would benefit you because it will allow you to set your timing at 34 degrees. In the real world this rarely is the case unless you are running well over 10-1 compression.
well put!
Old 05-23-2007, 06:52 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
 
5678TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

some folks run better on straight pump 92 octane.. i would only start using race gas in the 11.5:1+ compression ranges.. my bud at the track runs a 12:1 421 with iron heads and only mixes 25%race/75%pump
Old 05-23-2007, 07:17 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
V8Astro Captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 600 yds out
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Bee-Bowdy
Engine: blowd tree-fity
Transmission: sebin hunnerd
Axle/Gears: fo-tins
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

In addition to the info already posted, 110 octane will have lead in it. Using leaded fuel with an O2 sensor isn't such a great idea.
Old 05-24-2007, 07:18 AM
  #8  
Member

Thread Starter
 
xjcamaro89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 Holley TBI Personally Tuned
Transmission: 5 Speed
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

Thanks guys, im on a pit crew for a stock car driver at a local track, and can get racing fuel, or alcohol every week, just thought it might be worth it for any gains, thanks though!
Old 05-29-2007, 10:09 PM
  #9  
Member
 
HiPerf_Chevyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: The Wicked six'ah
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 3.08's
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

I ran 110 last summer at the dragstrip, It didnt change a thing. I messed with the timing.. Didnt gain a thing. I Run 92 and 89. I swap back and forth..
Old 06-01-2007, 08:26 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Tbi-MAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

I understand you guys say it don't do a thing. but get this, on my 90 seville, it actually makes that thing get great gas mileage! I can drive like 25 miles and it burn like .6-.8 gallons. This is also mixing it with 92 octane, I will normally add like 1 gallon 100 oct with about 5 gallons of 92. so wouldn't it give better mpg?
Old 06-01-2007, 11:00 AM
  #11  
Member
 
HiPerf_Chevyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: The Wicked six'ah
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 3.08's
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

Depends.... Some cars run worse with higher octane.. However.. In the camaro with my setup I get 25 mpg... I put 7 Gallons Of 110 In last summer.. which Filled the tank (weight) and it took forever to burn it.. and of course I messed with the timing, and when I finally burnt it up I put 89 in and the engine was pinging up hills and stalling in Reverse.. So Back to messing with the Timing.. Speaking of that, I gotta do that right now..
Old 06-01-2007, 03:48 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Jens J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?

I think you will lose some hp because of the slower flametravel!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
01-19-2024 04:55 PM
mustangman65_79
Tech / General Engine
7
04-14-2017 05:37 PM
86IROC112
Body
47
04-09-2016 10:20 PM
Newguy91rs
Tech / General Engine
2
08-07-2015 09:51 PM



Quick Reply: Racing fuel? Good or Bad?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 PM.