Differences between California TBI engines
Differences between California TBI engines
I've got 2 vehicles with California emissions TBI engines, a '91 305 in a Caprice wagon and a '94 350 in a 1500 truck. I'm working on upgrading the performance of both using tips from this forum.
When looking at ECM chips from some of the big suppliers (Jet and Hyperchip) I noticed that they list different chips for the California and non-California versions of these engines.
Does anybody know what is actually different on the Cal and non-Cal versions of these engines? The '94 350 was rated at less HP (195), does anybody know what the rating of the California '91 L03/305 was?
Can I use a non-California ECM chip on these engines or do I have to go with a California chip?
Thanks,
Paul T.
When looking at ECM chips from some of the big suppliers (Jet and Hyperchip) I noticed that they list different chips for the California and non-California versions of these engines.
Does anybody know what is actually different on the Cal and non-Cal versions of these engines? The '94 350 was rated at less HP (195), does anybody know what the rating of the California '91 L03/305 was?
Can I use a non-California ECM chip on these engines or do I have to go with a California chip?
Thanks,
Paul T.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 509
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Differences between California TBI engines
I've got 2 vehicles with California emissions TBI engines, a '91 305 in a Caprice wagon and a '94 350 in a 1500 truck. I'm working on upgrading the performance of both using tips from this forum.
When looking at ECM chips from some of the big suppliers (Jet and Hyperchip) I noticed that they list different chips for the California and non-California versions of these engines.
Does anybody know what is actually different on the Cal and non-Cal versions of these engines? The '94 350 was rated at less HP (195), does anybody know what the rating of the California '91 L03/305 was?
Can I use a non-California ECM chip on these engines or do I have to go with a California chip?
Thanks,
Paul T.
When looking at ECM chips from some of the big suppliers (Jet and Hyperchip) I noticed that they list different chips for the California and non-California versions of these engines.
Does anybody know what is actually different on the Cal and non-Cal versions of these engines? The '94 350 was rated at less HP (195), does anybody know what the rating of the California '91 L03/305 was?
Can I use a non-California ECM chip on these engines or do I have to go with a California chip?
Thanks,
Paul T.
The difference is the timing advance and fuel tables run in the chips.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: Differences between California TBI engines
If you need to pass Cali emssions, then start with Cali calibrations. And be careful of what areas are changed for fuel & SA. As Fast355 mentioned there are major differences in those areas between Fed & Cali cals.
The California calibrations typically run less timing (up to 10 deg less in areas on a '92 TBI Camaro). Along with running a slightly richer AFR (while in closed loop).
RBob.
The California calibrations typically run less timing (up to 10 deg less in areas on a '92 TBI Camaro). Along with running a slightly richer AFR (while in closed loop).
RBob.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









