How much initial timing advance is too much?
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
How much initial timing advance is too much?
I was fiddling with the timing on my '83 CFI the other day. The factory setting is 6* BTDC. I found though, that the more I advanced it, the smoother the engine ran. The tab only goes to 12*, but if I go even further, it seems to run even better. Let's call it about 17*.
I feel uncomfortable leaving it advanced that much, but it sure runs better, smoother and sounds better. What do we think?
I feel uncomfortable leaving it advanced that much, but it sure runs better, smoother and sounds better. What do we think?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 952
Likes: 2
From: Austria
Car: 84 TA / 89 Formula
Engine: LS1 / L03
Transmission: T56 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 / 3.27
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?
well, i can only speak about this in general because i have unfortunately never got a chance to work on or let alone drive one of these CFIs.. but here you go:
with the factory setup your engine would probably like something in the 15-20° range of total Spark Advance @idle, but the thing is that the initial timing you are setting is the baseline for spark advance (at least if you disconnected the ESC or EST connector).
the ecu or spark control is expecting 6° initial timing and goes from there to add another 10-15° to that, depending on various parameters, to get a total of the mentioned 15-20° SA or whatever is appropriate for e.g. warm idle operation.
could be that your spark control isn't working that good and that's why your changes actually made a difference in your smoothness and performance that big?
also, did you disconnect that connector when setting the timing?
as said, dunno how much of that really applies to cfi, just trying to give some concepts to think about.
hth
ownor
with the factory setup your engine would probably like something in the 15-20° range of total Spark Advance @idle, but the thing is that the initial timing you are setting is the baseline for spark advance (at least if you disconnected the ESC or EST connector).
the ecu or spark control is expecting 6° initial timing and goes from there to add another 10-15° to that, depending on various parameters, to get a total of the mentioned 15-20° SA or whatever is appropriate for e.g. warm idle operation.
could be that your spark control isn't working that good and that's why your changes actually made a difference in your smoothness and performance that big?

also, did you disconnect that connector when setting the timing?
as said, dunno how much of that really applies to cfi, just trying to give some concepts to think about.
hth
ownor
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?
well, i can only speak about this in general because i have unfortunately never got a chance to work on or let alone drive one of these CFIs.. but here you go:
with the factory setup your engine would probably like something in the 15-20° range of total Spark Advance @idle, but the thing is that the initial timing you are setting is the baseline for spark advance (at least if you disconnected the ESC or EST connector).
the ecu or spark control is expecting 6° initial timing and goes from there to add another 10-15° to that, depending on various parameters, to get a total of the mentioned 15-20° SA or whatever is appropriate for e.g. warm idle operation.
could be that your spark control isn't working that good and that's why your changes actually made a difference in your smoothness and performance that big?
also, did you disconnect that connector when setting the timing?
as said, dunno how much of that really applies to cfi, just trying to give some concepts to think about.
hth
ownor
with the factory setup your engine would probably like something in the 15-20° range of total Spark Advance @idle, but the thing is that the initial timing you are setting is the baseline for spark advance (at least if you disconnected the ESC or EST connector).
the ecu or spark control is expecting 6° initial timing and goes from there to add another 10-15° to that, depending on various parameters, to get a total of the mentioned 15-20° SA or whatever is appropriate for e.g. warm idle operation.
could be that your spark control isn't working that good and that's why your changes actually made a difference in your smoothness and performance that big?

also, did you disconnect that connector when setting the timing?
as said, dunno how much of that really applies to cfi, just trying to give some concepts to think about.
hth
ownor
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?
I was fiddling with the timing on my '83 CFI the other day. The factory setting is 6* BTDC. I found though, that the more I advanced it, the smoother the engine ran. The tab only goes to 12*, but if I go even further, it seems to run even better. Let's call it about 17*.
I feel uncomfortable leaving it advanced that much, but it sure runs better, smoother and sounds better. What do we think?
I feel uncomfortable leaving it advanced that much, but it sure runs better, smoother and sounds better. What do we think?
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?
Start up? Maybe it starts abit quicker, but if I didn't own the car, it wouldn't be enough for me to tell.
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?
Sounds like the car enjoys the advance. What type of plugs are you using? Have you pulled them to see color?
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?
No I haven't. Probably a good idea. But I'm wondering what combination of things, make the car happier with at least 10 more degress of advance, than the factory specs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM










