TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

How much initial timing advance is too much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 08:44 AM
  #1  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
How much initial timing advance is too much?

I was fiddling with the timing on my '83 CFI the other day. The factory setting is 6* BTDC. I found though, that the more I advanced it, the smoother the engine ran. The tab only goes to 12*, but if I go even further, it seems to run even better. Let's call it about 17*.

I feel uncomfortable leaving it advanced that much, but it sure runs better, smoother and sounds better. What do we think?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 09:09 AM
  #2  
ownor's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 952
Likes: 2
From: Austria
Car: 84 TA / 89 Formula
Engine: LS1 / L03
Transmission: T56 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 / 3.27
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?

well, i can only speak about this in general because i have unfortunately never got a chance to work on or let alone drive one of these CFIs.. but here you go:

with the factory setup your engine would probably like something in the 15-20° range of total Spark Advance @idle, but the thing is that the initial timing you are setting is the baseline for spark advance (at least if you disconnected the ESC or EST connector).

the ecu or spark control is expecting 6° initial timing and goes from there to add another 10-15° to that, depending on various parameters, to get a total of the mentioned 15-20° SA or whatever is appropriate for e.g. warm idle operation.

could be that your spark control isn't working that good and that's why your changes actually made a difference in your smoothness and performance that big?
also, did you disconnect that connector when setting the timing?

as said, dunno how much of that really applies to cfi, just trying to give some concepts to think about.

hth
ownor
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #3  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?

Originally Posted by ownor
well, i can only speak about this in general because i have unfortunately never got a chance to work on or let alone drive one of these CFIs.. but here you go:

with the factory setup your engine would probably like something in the 15-20° range of total Spark Advance @idle, but the thing is that the initial timing you are setting is the baseline for spark advance (at least if you disconnected the ESC or EST connector).

the ecu or spark control is expecting 6° initial timing and goes from there to add another 10-15° to that, depending on various parameters, to get a total of the mentioned 15-20° SA or whatever is appropriate for e.g. warm idle operation.

could be that your spark control isn't working that good and that's why your changes actually made a difference in your smoothness and performance that big?
also, did you disconnect that connector when setting the timing?

as said, dunno how much of that really applies to cfi, just trying to give some concepts to think about.

hth
ownor
Yes, I disconnected the EST.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 10:36 AM
  #4  
monkihead's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?

Originally Posted by chazman
I was fiddling with the timing on my '83 CFI the other day. The factory setting is 6* BTDC. I found though, that the more I advanced it, the smoother the engine ran. The tab only goes to 12*, but if I go even further, it seems to run even better. Let's call it about 17*.

I feel uncomfortable leaving it advanced that much, but it sure runs better, smoother and sounds better. What do we think?
does it start up quicker with the different base timing? do you feel a flat level of power as it rev's under load?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 11:51 AM
  #5  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?

Originally Posted by monkihead
does it start up quicker with the different base timing? do you feel a flat level of power as it rev's under load?
So far, there seem to no issues as it revs, just more smoothness and better exhaust note.

Start up? Maybe it starts abit quicker, but if I didn't own the car, it wouldn't be enough for me to tell.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #6  
monkihead's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?

Originally Posted by chazman
So far, there seem to no issues as it revs, just more smoothness and better exhaust note.

Start up? Maybe it starts abit quicker, but if I didn't own the car, it wouldn't be enough for me to tell.
Sounds like the car enjoys the advance. What type of plugs are you using? Have you pulled them to see color?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
chazman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: How much initial timing advance is too much?

Originally Posted by monkihead
Sounds like the car enjoys the advance. What type of plugs are you using? Have you pulled them to see color?
No I haven't. Probably a good idea. But I'm wondering what combination of things, make the car happier with at least 10 more degress of advance, than the factory specs.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM
bellez77
Body
14
Sep 5, 2015 08:39 PM
Armored91Camaro
DIY PROM
3
Aug 12, 2015 09:41 AM
Thirim
LTX and LSX
2
Aug 9, 2015 06:19 PM
djmarch
Tech / General Engine
5
Aug 9, 2015 05:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.