Thirdgen Aerodynamics?
Thread Starter
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Thirdgen Aerodynamics?
Drag Coeffiecent
New Vette - 0.29
New Camaro - 0.32
93-97 Camaro - .33 or .34
Thirdgens?
New Vette - 0.29
New Camaro - 0.32
93-97 Camaro - .33 or .34
Thirdgens?
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
I beleive the thirdgen firebirds were lower than camaro's. I think they sit between .33 and .31.
The thirdgen body was a damn good design from an aerodynamic point of view.
The thirdgen body was a damn good design from an aerodynamic point of view.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tex USA
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550
early fbirds were as low as .299
those ones that had the KIT flat wheel covers.
With headlights up, fbirds were higher than camaros. Most z28s were in the .34 range.
Some fourth gens with wide tires are as high as .36
With headlights up, fbirds were higher than camaros. Most z28s were in the .34 range.
Some fourth gens with wide tires are as high as .36
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM
