What has she got?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: LA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: Holley MPFI, AFR 195, Hot Cam=375HP
Transmission: T-56
What has she got?
I'm getting a 385 built and it will be ready soon, just wondering what kind of numbers it's going to make at what RPM. Just guesses if anyone got some or if some one could throw it through DD2K er somethin that be cool too. Specs are below...
Eagle Cast Steel Crank
Eagle Forged H beam Rods
Eagle Forged Pistons, 10:1 compression
AFR 195 Standard heads
2.02/1.60 Valves; 1.530 O.D. Springs; 7/16 rocker studs
Holley MPFI Intake (Not Stealth Ram)
36lb/hr injectors, 1000 cfm TB, KN Extreme Filter
LT4 Hot Cam
Duration: 218/228 @ 0.050, Lift: 0.525/0.525
SLP 1 3/4" Headers
High Flow CAT
Single 3" Exhaust
Edelbrock Aluminum Water Pump
D.U.I. Distributor w/ Dyna Mod
Thanks for the guesses...
Eagle Cast Steel Crank
Eagle Forged H beam Rods
Eagle Forged Pistons, 10:1 compression
AFR 195 Standard heads
2.02/1.60 Valves; 1.530 O.D. Springs; 7/16 rocker studs
Holley MPFI Intake (Not Stealth Ram)
36lb/hr injectors, 1000 cfm TB, KN Extreme Filter
LT4 Hot Cam
Duration: 218/228 @ 0.050, Lift: 0.525/0.525
SLP 1 3/4" Headers
High Flow CAT
Single 3" Exhaust
Edelbrock Aluminum Water Pump
D.U.I. Distributor w/ Dyna Mod
Thanks for the guesses...
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: mayfield, OH
Car: 82 Trans am
Engine: Twin turbo 350
Transmission: T-56
The black dot means your subscribed to the post.
I'm gonna say your estimated specs are about right. Maybe a little more torque. Good luck with the t-5.
I'm gonna say your estimated specs are about right. Maybe a little more torque. Good luck with the t-5.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: LA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: Holley MPFI, AFR 195, Hot Cam=375HP
Transmission: T-56
Cool thanks.
Yea, the T-5 is gonna love my torque curve, -I'm sure. The stock RS front brakes like it too (too bad I spent all my money on the motor)
Any other guesses, anyone with DD2K. Thx.
Yea, the T-5 is gonna love my torque curve, -I'm sure. The stock RS front brakes like it too (too bad I spent all my money on the motor)
Any other guesses, anyone with DD2K. Thx.
Supreme Member

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
DD2K sux. Use Engine Analyzer. It is more accurate. Go to http://www.themustangshop.com/downloads.cfm.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: LA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: Holley MPFI, AFR 195, Hot Cam=375HP
Transmission: T-56
I got two questions...
If I go with a bigger cam will I loose any torque or could I gain both HP and torque.
What other things would you suggest to add power to this motor.
Suggestions I've already gotten...
Electric Water Pump (Expensive, but possible)
Dry Sump Oiling (Not likely)
Windage Tray/Crank Scraper (Not sure how much this would help)
Anyone know? Thx
If I go with a bigger cam will I loose any torque or could I gain both HP and torque.
What other things would you suggest to add power to this motor.
Suggestions I've already gotten...
Electric Water Pump (Expensive, but possible)
Dry Sump Oiling (Not likely)
Windage Tray/Crank Scraper (Not sure how much this would help)
Anyone know? Thx
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: LA
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: Holley MPFI, AFR 195, Hot Cam=375HP
Transmission: T-56
Jfreeman,
Thanks for the Engine Analyzer link. It's a bitchen program, just unzipped it, defintely more detailed than DD2K. Don't suppose anyone knows where to get specs on some of the more popular performnce parts. Holley, Edelbrock, SLP, AFR, etc. Thx.
Ben
Thanks for the Engine Analyzer link. It's a bitchen program, just unzipped it, defintely more detailed than DD2K. Don't suppose anyone knows where to get specs on some of the more popular performnce parts. Holley, Edelbrock, SLP, AFR, etc. Thx.
Ben
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Originally posted by Bens3rdGen
Why do I have a black dot over my Chevy symbol near the title of my post?
Why do I have a black dot over my Chevy symbol near the title of my post?
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by Bens3rdGen
If I go with a bigger cam will I loose any torque or could I gain both HP and torque.
If I go with a bigger cam will I loose any torque or could I gain both HP and torque.
Basically, the peak will get kicked up higher in the rpm band a little more. (probably)
I have played with both DeskTop Dyno and Engine Analyzer and I have to say that I like DD2k better. There are more avialable "custom" inputs I can enter than in Engine Analyzer. As an example, for heads DD2K will allow (and use) up to 14 flow entries, Engine Analyzer only asks for 1 (in expert mode). In cam selection Engine Analyzer has most common grinds in it already where as DD2K you have to buy the disk for that but you can enter and change every aspect of your cam spec to match what you have.
Engine Analyzer has a nice little reporting feature, but it assumes too much, such as fuel delivery warnings, piston speed warnings, even though you tell it you are running a max of 5 grand it still assumes you want 6 grand.
Too much in areas I don't want and too little in the areas I do.
Plus, I do believe DD2K is a bit more accurate, though it "over estimates" a bit, I find that Engine Analyzer grossly underestimates.
Engine Analyzer has a nice little reporting feature, but it assumes too much, such as fuel delivery warnings, piston speed warnings, even though you tell it you are running a max of 5 grand it still assumes you want 6 grand.
Too much in areas I don't want and too little in the areas I do.
Plus, I do believe DD2K is a bit more accurate, though it "over estimates" a bit, I find that Engine Analyzer grossly underestimates.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Morley
I have played with both DeskTop Dyno and Engine Analyzer and I have to say that I like DD2k better. There are more avialable "custom" inputs I can enter than in Engine Analyzer. As an example, for heads DD2K will allow (and use) up to 14 flow entries, Engine Analyzer only asks for 1 (in expert mode). In cam selection Engine Analyzer has most common grinds in it already where as DD2K you have to buy the disk for that but you can enter and change every aspect of your cam spec to match what you have.
Engine Analyzer has a nice little reporting feature, but it assumes too much, such as fuel delivery warnings, piston speed warnings, even though you tell it you are running a max of 5 grand it still assumes you want 6 grand.
Too much in areas I don't want and too little in the areas I do.
Plus, I do believe DD2K is a bit more accurate, though it "over estimates" a bit, I find that Engine Analyzer grossly underestimates.
I have played with both DeskTop Dyno and Engine Analyzer and I have to say that I like DD2k better. There are more avialable "custom" inputs I can enter than in Engine Analyzer. As an example, for heads DD2K will allow (and use) up to 14 flow entries, Engine Analyzer only asks for 1 (in expert mode). In cam selection Engine Analyzer has most common grinds in it already where as DD2K you have to buy the disk for that but you can enter and change every aspect of your cam spec to match what you have.
Engine Analyzer has a nice little reporting feature, but it assumes too much, such as fuel delivery warnings, piston speed warnings, even though you tell it you are running a max of 5 grand it still assumes you want 6 grand.
Too much in areas I don't want and too little in the areas I do.
Plus, I do believe DD2K is a bit more accurate, though it "over estimates" a bit, I find that Engine Analyzer grossly underestimates.
Only other problem with the software I mentioned is the cost. $18,000 for Virtual 4-stroke
or $1000 for FSAE teams. 


