dyno results, A/F problem?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
dyno results, A/F problem?
here is my Graph, their graph was kinda hard to read, so i made my own on excel 274.8 hp 329.5 tq I believe the air/fuel is way off
Last edited by IROC of 88; Sep 14, 2003 at 07:02 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
yeah it should cross at 5252 rpm... b/c hp is a function of torque and you use this formula to get hp
hp = (torque (ft. lbs) x RPM)/ 5252
hp = (torque (ft. lbs) x RPM)/ 5252
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
even if the air/fuel is wrong? cause if so,, then my HP should be like 320 something at 5252 rpm
what is causing my car to give out numbers like this?
what is causing my car to give out numbers like this?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
They always cross at 5252.11 RPM. They have to. They have no choice.
HP is calculated from torque. The formula is
HP = Torque x RPM / (33,000/2pi)
Since 33,000/2pi = 5252.11, the curves cross there by definition.
You made a mistake somewhere in the graphing process. Post the raw torque numbers at 200 RPM intervals or however you have them.
A/F has nothing to do with any of this. What was the wideband O2 reading? Without that, it's going to be pretty hard to tell what the A/F ratio was during the pull. The usefulness of a dyno pull without that is pretty drastically reduced.
HP is calculated from torque. The formula is
HP = Torque x RPM / (33,000/2pi)
Since 33,000/2pi = 5252.11, the curves cross there by definition.
You made a mistake somewhere in the graphing process. Post the raw torque numbers at 200 RPM intervals or however you have them.
A/F has nothing to do with any of this. What was the wideband O2 reading? Without that, it's going to be pretty hard to tell what the A/F ratio was during the pull. The usefulness of a dyno pull without that is pretty drastically reduced.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
I changed the graph, i did graph it wrong, the new one is above... here are the a/f ratios
3000 14
3200 14
3400 14.1
3600 14.35
3800 14.85
4000 15.35
4200 15.9
4400 16.5
4600 17.6
4800 off the chart past 4700 where it is 18:1
3000 14
3200 14
3400 14.1
3600 14.35
3800 14.85
4000 15.35
4200 15.9
4400 16.5
4600 17.6
4800 off the chart past 4700 where it is 18:1
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
It's lean, everywhere, but especially up high. You should have a A/F somewhere in the 13.0:1 neighborhood.
Looks to me like there's some sort of fuel starvation going on. It would be real helpful to have fuel pressure readings during the run. You could probably get suitable ones suring a 2nd gear run up an expressway ramp or some such.
Looks to me like there's some sort of fuel starvation going on. It would be real helpful to have fuel pressure readings during the run. You could probably get suitable ones suring a 2nd gear run up an expressway ramp or some such.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
well, not sure if this is the same, but when i rev the engine to like 3000 or so RPM it still says about 50... so does that mean it stays there?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
No, it is definitely not the same. THe engine's fuel flow requirement is probably 5 times greater at least when under full load compared to just winging the throttle on an unloaded engine.
I doubt your problem is the stock pump, unless you have a blower and you're making more than 10 psi of boost, in which case you may need well over 50 psi so that there will still be 50 psi more fuel pressure than air pressure in the intake. I'd suspect either a clogged fuel filter, or a dying pump.
In any case you need to get it taken care of right away, before you end up with pistons with holes in them. At your moderate HP level I don't see a need for anything beyond a stock pump, although that's your decision to make. It does seem like aftermarket pumps are a reliability problem when used in daily-friver applications though, if that's an issue in your situation.
I doubt your problem is the stock pump, unless you have a blower and you're making more than 10 psi of boost, in which case you may need well over 50 psi so that there will still be 50 psi more fuel pressure than air pressure in the intake. I'd suspect either a clogged fuel filter, or a dying pump.
In any case you need to get it taken care of right away, before you end up with pistons with holes in them. At your moderate HP level I don't see a need for anything beyond a stock pump, although that's your decision to make. It does seem like aftermarket pumps are a reliability problem when used in daily-friver applications though, if that's an issue in your situation.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
the pump was put in in june or july, and the filter was put in in april or may.... so i doubt either one of those are bad...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Do a couple of 2nd gear blasts up an expressway ramp or something with your fuel pressure gauge taped to your windshield. Find out what your FP is with the engine under actual full-load operating conditions.
If you find that your fuel pressure is low, then ..... your fuel pressure is low. You need to find out why and deal with it. If it turns out that the filter is restricted or the pump isn't working right, then .... the filter is restricted, or the pump isn't working right. Being relatively new doesn't somehow relieve them of being at fault for being bad. No matter whether you just replaced them yesterday or they have 200,000 miles on them, if they're not working right, they need to be repaired or replaced.
If you find that your fuel pressure is low, then ..... your fuel pressure is low. You need to find out why and deal with it. If it turns out that the filter is restricted or the pump isn't working right, then .... the filter is restricted, or the pump isn't working right. Being relatively new doesn't somehow relieve them of being at fault for being bad. No matter whether you just replaced them yesterday or they have 200,000 miles on them, if they're not working right, they need to be repaired or replaced.
Last edited by RB83L69; Sep 15, 2003 at 09:03 AM.
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 510
Likes: 5
From: Santiago, CHILE
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
Engine: 305 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: The famous 700R4
Axle/Gears: No idea
My problem is very similar.
(Good compression, vacuum, fuel presure, new filter).
I'm thinking if a bad spark plug wire can cause the same lean condition as a bad fuel presure?.
How can I do test a bad spark wire?.
Please, please, help me please.
Thanks in advance,
Denis V.
(Good compression, vacuum, fuel presure, new filter).
I'm thinking if a bad spark plug wire can cause the same lean condition as a bad fuel presure?.
How can I do test a bad spark wire?.
Please, please, help me please.
Thanks in advance,
Denis V.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I'm thinking if a bad spark plug wire can cause the same lean condition as a bad fuel presure
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by IROC of 88
well, not sure if this is the same, but when i rev the engine to like 3000 or so RPM it still says about 50... so does that mean it stays there?
well, not sure if this is the same, but when i rev the engine to like 3000 or so RPM it still says about 50... so does that mean it stays there?
All of these are adding up to where you need to get a proper tune done on the PROM. Either DIY or find a dyno shop that can do it for you.
The lower RPM range lean-ness is probably from either the gutted MAF or the injector constant (PROM calibration), or both.
The higher RPM range lean-ness is probably from maxing out the MAF. When this happens the ECM doesn't add any additional fuel beyond that point. You need to use some PROM tuning tricks to get around that.
RBob.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
Ed Wright did custom tune my prom.... and I have decided to get a better fuel pump... a 255lph one... i think that should be good
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by IROC of 88
Ed Wright did custom tune my prom.... and I have decided to get a better fuel pump... a 255lph one... i think that should be good
Ed Wright did custom tune my prom.... and I have decided to get a better fuel pump... a 255lph one... i think that should be good
RBob.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Hard to say...
Maybe you should invest in a PROM burning setup, and use your dyno time to do some tuning. The best chip burner in the world can only guess what your motor needs, if he can't run it and see what the results are.
It sure isn't right like it is now, that's for certain. Something is out to lunch.
Maybe you should invest in a PROM burning setup, and use your dyno time to do some tuning. The best chip burner in the world can only guess what your motor needs, if he can't run it and see what the results are.
It sure isn't right like it is now, that's for certain. Something is out to lunch.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Indpls IN US
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Forged 383
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Dude, your problem isn't maxxing out the maf or something magical in the chip
. I've talked to several dyno operators and 95% of the time someone is missing hp, it's due to a fuel problem. That's your problem, so your'e on the right track about checking out your fuel pump. Yeah, you can gain hp and tq from the chip, but I wouldn't say more than 20, 30 tops. You're missing about 80hp and 80ft lbs at the tires. That's something that ain't going to be fixxed by fiddling with the chip on a MAF car. SD is different, though.
. I've talked to several dyno operators and 95% of the time someone is missing hp, it's due to a fuel problem. That's your problem, so your'e on the right track about checking out your fuel pump. Yeah, you can gain hp and tq from the chip, but I wouldn't say more than 20, 30 tops. You're missing about 80hp and 80ft lbs at the tires. That's something that ain't going to be fixxed by fiddling with the chip on a MAF car. SD is different, though. Originally posted by RB83L69
No. That can cause a misfire, can't cause a lean condition.
No. That can cause a misfire, can't cause a lean condition.
if the car is misfiring then the oxygen level will be high in the exhaust.when a car misfires ,air just passes thru an engine without combustion thus, the oxygen sensor will read higher.
id make sure u have adequate fuel pressure at full load.
then id start checking the ignition system.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
no body said anything about miss firing.... i do not think.... but i have got the pump on order, so it should be here soon
o2
Originally posted by RB83L69
The oxygen sensor isn't in the picture at WOT.
The oxygen sensor isn't in the picture at WOT.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
well i got the new walbro pump in and it still had the same air/fuel problem.... actually less hp this time.... so i am changing the fuel filter, and then gonna run it on the dyno with a fuel pressure gauge on it to make sure fuel pressure is not falling off...
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Indpls IN US
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Forged 383
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
What's the deal w/ your regulator, have you thoroughly checked it for problems? Maybe those damn Ford injectors are shot. Did you buy them new? If so they're ususally very reliable. Are all your injectors firing? What do your plugs look like after you made those dyno runs? Sounds like your engine just can't get any gas.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: See Signature
Transmission: B&M 700r4
well my MAF sensor was bad.... it was maxxing out at 165 gram per sec.... put on a new MAF and the a/f ratio went to 13:1 all the way across the board
Originally posted by IROC of 88
well my MAF sensor was bad.... it was maxxing out at 165 gram per sec.... put on a new MAF and the a/f ratio went to 13:1 all the way across the board
well my MAF sensor was bad.... it was maxxing out at 165 gram per sec.... put on a new MAF and the a/f ratio went to 13:1 all the way across the board
Originally posted by camarojoe
Dude, your problem isn't maxxing out the maf or something magical in the chip
. I've talked to several dyno operators and 95% of the time someone is missing hp, it's due to a fuel problem. That's your problem, so your'e on the right track about checking out your fuel pump. Yeah, you can gain hp and tq from the chip, but I wouldn't say more than 20, 30 tops. You're missing about 80hp and 80ft lbs at the tires. That's something that ain't going to be fixxed by fiddling with the chip on a MAF car. SD is different, though.
Dude, your problem isn't maxxing out the maf or something magical in the chip
. I've talked to several dyno operators and 95% of the time someone is missing hp, it's due to a fuel problem. That's your problem, so your'e on the right track about checking out your fuel pump. Yeah, you can gain hp and tq from the chip, but I wouldn't say more than 20, 30 tops. You're missing about 80hp and 80ft lbs at the tires. That's something that ain't going to be fixxed by fiddling with the chip on a MAF car. SD is different, though. You need stop posting before someone dumber than you believes you and does something stupid.
the chip isnt magical its just pretty much EVERYTHING when it comes to tuning your setup.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
20
Nov 14, 2015 12:02 AM




