Serpentine Accessory Belt Drive
Re: Serpentine Accessory Belt Drive
Originally posted by Parrydise7
Has anybody changed over to a serpentine accessory belt drive? Good idea?
Has anybody changed over to a serpentine accessory belt drive? Good idea?
Lots of people have. There are pros and cons to both systems.
V belt pros:
1) There are 3 different belts running the water pump, so if one breaks the pump still runs.
2) Simpler belt routing.
3) Eliminating air pump or A/C compressor is easier.
V belt cons:
1) More belts to change
2) Brackets that attatch all over the front of the engine
3) Multiple brackets are heavier
Serp belt pros:
1) Only 1 belt to change.
2) Bracketry is lighter
3) Fewer brackets
4) Brackets don't hook to the water pump (easier to change the pump)
Serp belt cons:
1) If the belt breaks you loose everything (keep a spare and something to move the tensioner)
2) Harder to eliminate unwanted accessories.
3) If the bracket breaks, very expensive to replace.
It boils down to what you want and if you want the expense of changing to the serp setup.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 4
From: Another world, some other time
Car: 86 LG4 & 92 TBI Firebird
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Re: Serpentine Accessory Belt Drive
Originally posted by Morley
4) Brackets don't hook to the water pump (easier to change the pump)
4) Brackets don't hook to the water pump (easier to change the pump)
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Sure you can remove unwanted accessories...I did a smog pump and AC delete. I am not even running my passenger side bracket anymore. I made my alternator adjustable. Now I am running a 50'' belt and just my pass side bracket. Its sweet.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Vbelts slip more.
surp belts last longer
surp require less tenson on the belt then the Vbelt does.. that lowers strain on the pullys and gives longer bearing life.
surp belts dont break easily.... and give plenty of warning before they start to go real bad..... Vbelts tend to jsut GO...
surp belts last longer
surp require less tenson on the belt then the Vbelt does.. that lowers strain on the pullys and gives longer bearing life.
surp belts dont break easily.... and give plenty of warning before they start to go real bad..... Vbelts tend to jsut GO...
Originally posted by MrDude_1
Vbelts slip more.
surp belts last longer
Vbelts slip more.
surp belts last longer
Along with serpentine belts V belt technology has come a long way in the past 20 years, they all last longer and perform better than they ever did.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by Morley
Gotta disagree with this one. When I replaced my engine at 140k miles and 16 years old, I was still running the factory supplied belts on all accessories (V belts). They have never slipped or broken, cracked or checked.
Along with serpentine belts V belt technology has come a long way in the past 20 years, they all last longer and perform better than they ever did.
Gotta disagree with this one. When I replaced my engine at 140k miles and 16 years old, I was still running the factory supplied belts on all accessories (V belts). They have never slipped or broken, cracked or checked.
Along with serpentine belts V belt technology has come a long way in the past 20 years, they all last longer and perform better than they ever did.
BUT
serpentine belts got the same advances in compounds
and serpentine belts have more surface area.....
i didnt say Vbelts couldnt do a good job.... just that serpentine ones do a better one.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by ronterry
Hmmm how about the best of both worlds?
My little setup, using march pullies, & off the shelf 6 rib belts.
Ron
Hmmm how about the best of both worlds?
My little setup, using march pullies, & off the shelf 6 rib belts.
Ron
thats still a surp belt system IMO.... but yea, that works great.. looks nice too.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
From: Elizabeth, Colorado
Car: '94 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
naaa, cost under 300 bucks.
btw: It's (2) serpentine belts, and only uses the inside. I don't if that still qualifies 'MrDude_1'? It does use serpentine belts, but not so much the system...
The main reasons for taking this route is no brackets or tensionors needed for a regular serpentine setup, and I got sick of throwing my V-belts at 6K rpms.
(Yes, I do have an aftermarket alt bracket, but you can use stock vbelt brackets.)
Did I mension it uses light weight aluminium pullies, in a high water flow ratio.
Ron
btw: It's (2) serpentine belts, and only uses the inside. I don't if that still qualifies 'MrDude_1'? It does use serpentine belts, but not so much the system...
The main reasons for taking this route is no brackets or tensionors needed for a regular serpentine setup, and I got sick of throwing my V-belts at 6K rpms.
(Yes, I do have an aftermarket alt bracket, but you can use stock vbelt brackets.)
Did I mension it uses light weight aluminium pullies, in a high water flow ratio.
Ron
Originally posted by MrDude_1
BUT
serpentine belts got the same advances in compounds
BUT
serpentine belts got the same advances in compounds
Along with serpentine belts V belt technology has come a long way in the past 20 years, they all last longer and perform better than they ever did[/b][/quote]
and serpentine belts have more surface area.....
i didnt say Vbelts couldnt do a good job.... just that serpentine ones do a better one.
And the second one.... You'll never convince me that serpentine belts are any better than V belts, I own both and neither has ever been a problem (except that the books are wrong as to what size serp belt goes on my Firebird) I've had my V belt cars at over 5k RPM with all accessories on (lights, heater etc) and never had a failure or jumped belt.
To the original poster...if you have V belts and they are working, then you gotta ask; is it worth the $$ to convert to another belt setup?
Originally posted by ronterry
Hmmm how about the best of both worlds?
My little setup, using march pullies, & off the shelf 6 rib belts.
Ron
Hmmm how about the best of both worlds?
My little setup, using march pullies, & off the shelf 6 rib belts.
Ron
Just curious where you got the pulleys at? and if you still have the p/n s for them? i like your setup, im thinking of doing the same thing
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I will get some pictures of my setup ASAP. I have a serpentine setup with just one bracket. It was very simple...total cost 20$...10 for a belt and 10 for a old style adjustable bracket.
I will get pictures. It really cleans everything up nicely.
I will get pictures. It really cleans everything up nicely.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
From: Elizabeth, Colorado
Car: '94 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Just curious where you got the pulleys at? and if you still have the p/n s for them? i like your setup, im thinking of doing the same thing
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...5&pagenumber=3
Bought it all from Summit.
Good Luck,
Ron
Last edited by ronterry; Apr 26, 2004 at 02:24 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
evilstuie
Tech / General Engine
22
Jan 9, 2020 08:29 PM
mustangdmurder
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Aug 21, 2015 07:17 PM
mcquigg
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Aug 13, 2015 02:26 PM





