Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Camshaft - Advance/Retard Optimization

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2004 | 05:52 AM
  #1  
formulaman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Camshaft - Advance/Retard Optimization

It seams that nearly every off the shelf cam comes with a ground-in 4 degrees of advance. Every single engine combintation that I have simulated on Desk-top-Dyno shows best power with 0 degrees of advance (about 20-40 hp better than with 4 degrees of advance). The dyno curves also show very very little low end loss at 0 degrees of advance.

So what gives? If Desk top dyno has any accuracy, why are all the cam manufactures recommending installing them 4 degrees advanced? Am I missing something here? Is it not done because of a reduction in idle quality?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #2  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
the cam grinders don't recommend you install a cam advanced, or retarded any more than straight up. they grind 4* advance into a cam to make more torque. i'd install the cam straight up with the 4* advance ground into it. you'll make the most HP with the cam installed at 4* retard. DD isn't known for being greatly reliabler either, more of a good guess sort of thing.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #3  
vexter's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
From: White Hall, Ar
Car: '88 Iroc
Engine: 305
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45
.

Last edited by vexter; Jan 4, 2004 at 12:14 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2004 | 12:14 PM
  #4  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Cam grinders design their cams to be installed with the intake lobe centerline at a particular angle with respect to the crank rotation. It is pointless to get all worked up about whether the specific angular relationship the mfr calls for happens to be "advanced", "straight up", or "retarded" from the stock angle.

In other words, use the right timing set, put the cam in using the timing set's "0" mark, and the cam will come out where it was designed to come out. It's a waste of time trying to pick apart whether that's "advanced" or whatever, compared to where some other cam was designed to go. It's meaningless. So: if the cam was designed to go in with the intake center at 106°, then put it in at 106°, and don't bother whether it's "advanced" or whatever.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2004 | 12:45 PM
  #5  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
If DD2000 is showing a big difference by advancing or retarding the cam 4* either way, you either have too big of a cam, or too small of a cam for the rest of the combo, be it heads, intake, carb, exhaust, etc.

David Vizard points this out in many of his books, including one about dynomometer simulation software.

You should worry more about choosing the right cam, not making the wrong cam work better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bubbajones_ya
Cooling
24
Jul 6, 2024 08:32 PM
manualbrakes.com
Brakes
63
Apr 9, 2024 11:55 AM
PurelyPMD
Camaros for Sale
27
May 5, 2016 04:57 PM
88SS6SPEED
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Nov 11, 2015 07:05 AM
GTAman
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Sep 26, 2015 02:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.