Cross-Fire Injection Intake Manifold
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: Orangevale, CA
Car: 07 Silverado
Engine: 5.3L V8, flexfuel E85
Transmission: 4spd. Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locking diff.
Cross-Fire Injection Intake Manifold
I have an 83 Z28 with CFI. I just put a new 350 in the car and found out the old intake manifold is stripped out where the water neck bolts in. So now the coolant is slowly leaking out, it's getting worse over time of course. GM does not make this manifold anymore I was told by a dealership, and it's impossible to find it anywhere it seems. Does anyone have any suggestions on what to do or where I can find a replacement? When I put the 350 in the car I also put a new computer and chip in the car that is made for 84 vettes with CFI because they had 350's. I also put 84 vette CFI 350 fuel injectors in the car. Does anyone know if I can put the same manifold from an 84 vette with CFI and 350 in my car. If so, have any suggestions on where to find them? I would love any help. Thanks!
Last edited by wills83z28cfi; Jan 14, 2004 at 05:40 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Yup, I'd try a Heli-Coil first.
Yes the manifold is the same on a 305 and a 350 CFI. It choked a 350 even worse than it did the 305. That's why the CFI Vettes were so pitifully slow. The L69 cars could walk all over them. Would have been humorous if it wasn't so humiliating to see GM's flagship performance car sunk so low as to get beat by a far cheaper car with a 305.
Yes the manifold is the same on a 305 and a 350 CFI. It choked a 350 even worse than it did the 305. That's why the CFI Vettes were so pitifully slow. The L69 cars could walk all over them. Would have been humorous if it wasn't so humiliating to see GM's flagship performance car sunk so low as to get beat by a far cheaper car with a 305.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: Orangevale, CA
Car: 07 Silverado
Engine: 5.3L V8, flexfuel E85
Transmission: 4spd. Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locking diff.
Thanks for all of the help everyone! I am going to try and restore my current manifold for now. Thanks to those who gave me the offer to buy their used manifolds. I will let you know if I need one of them if it doesn't work out with restoring mine. Thanks again!
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Car: 83 Crossfire Z28; 82 Crossfire Corvette; 68 455 Firebird
If you haven't ported it, and are removing it again, you should consider it...
Tech Article on Porting a Crossfire Manifold....
Tech Article on Porting a Crossfire Manifold....
Yup, Heli-Coil is the easiest fix for it. I've repaired the water neck holes in I don't know how many aluminum intakes with heli-coils. Just make sure to drill the holes straight before using the heli-coil tap. I think I had to do my carb stud holes at one time if I remember right too. All the aftermarket companies should've done this to their aluminum intakes to begin with! Most of your high dollar aluminum engine parts have this done when they're manufactured. Oh, btw, if you ever do need to pick up another crossfire intake, just look on ebay. I see them on there all the time for dirt cheap. My dad has an 82 vette with the crossfire and he's bought two extra intakes off ebay for next to nothing.
Last edited by Pat Hall; Jan 16, 2004 at 06:33 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 5
From: New Jersey
Car: 86 Corvette, 89 IROC, 1999 TA
Engine: 350, 350, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.07, 373, 4.10
Heli coils are great, i picked up a proformer rpm intake at a swap meet for 5 bucks cause the bolt holes for the carb were all stripped, well 3 of em anyway.. 3 heli coils later i got a good buy
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: Orangevale, CA
Car: 07 Silverado
Engine: 5.3L V8, flexfuel E85
Transmission: 4spd. Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locking diff.
Originally posted by chevyhacker
If you haven't ported it, and are removing it again, you should consider it...
Tech Article on Porting a Crossfire Manifold....
If you haven't ported it, and are removing it again, you should consider it...
Tech Article on Porting a Crossfire Manifold....
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Car: 83 Crossfire Z28; 82 Crossfire Corvette; 68 455 Firebird
Sigh....
Actually, it was more commonly called cease-fire injection
The 82 & 83 Camaros have hood flaps that open at WOT.
Some people obviously didn't realize that driving WOT in a pouring rain or with large amounts of water on your hood was a BAD idea. Can you say HYDROLOCK?
Being GM's first mass produced eletronic fuel injection didn't help - sure the system had comparable (slightly better) horsepower numbers to the emissions choked carbs of the late 70s, but it wasn't a massive gain (GM was reading TPI and the L98 at the time). The crossfire shortblocks weren't anything to be proud of either - small emissions cams and small valves...
While I like my crossfire cars today - I can't imagine owning one without WinALDL, and the ability to change proms, etc. Not to mention that GM didn't have larger injectors available at the time (to my knowledge, I could be wrong....)
Its taken 20 years for the DIY community to really get a handle on the system - there never was any real aftermarket support like for TPI but there were MANY MANY more years of TPI.
And no, my crossfire cars don't misfire unless I do something stupid with my ignition system
Actually, it was more commonly called cease-fire injection
The 82 & 83 Camaros have hood flaps that open at WOT.
Some people obviously didn't realize that driving WOT in a pouring rain or with large amounts of water on your hood was a BAD idea. Can you say HYDROLOCK?
Being GM's first mass produced eletronic fuel injection didn't help - sure the system had comparable (slightly better) horsepower numbers to the emissions choked carbs of the late 70s, but it wasn't a massive gain (GM was reading TPI and the L98 at the time). The crossfire shortblocks weren't anything to be proud of either - small emissions cams and small valves...
While I like my crossfire cars today - I can't imagine owning one without WinALDL, and the ability to change proms, etc. Not to mention that GM didn't have larger injectors available at the time (to my knowledge, I could be wrong....)
Its taken 20 years for the DIY community to really get a handle on the system - there never was any real aftermarket support like for TPI but there were MANY MANY more years of TPI.
And no, my crossfire cars don't misfire unless I do something stupid with my ignition system
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
Car: '98 Z28 LS1
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 373
Hey ChevyHacker I knew it had something to do with water but did not know about the flaps at WOT! Thanks for sharing that. I've heard many names for the CFI but was only able to remember that one. Again appreciate the knowledge.
CALIROCZ28
CALIROCZ28
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Car: 83 Crossfire Z28; 82 Crossfire Corvette; 68 455 Firebird
I've thought a dozen times about adding a relay to kill the flaps when the wipers are on - but then again, maybe I'm old enough now not to go into WOT in the rain.....NAH....
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
Car: '98 Z28 LS1
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 373
Your only that old if you let someone tell you your to old. Don't listen. Drive hard, drive safe and have fun till we die of old age!
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: Orangevale, CA
Car: 07 Silverado
Engine: 5.3L V8, flexfuel E85
Transmission: 4spd. Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locking diff.
Originally posted by chevyhacker
Sigh....
Actually, it was more commonly called cease-fire injection
The 82 & 83 Camaros have hood flaps that open at WOT.
Some people obviously didn't realize that driving WOT in a pouring rain or with large amounts of water on your hood was a BAD idea. Can you say HYDROLOCK?
Being GM's first mass produced eletronic fuel injection didn't help - sure the system had comparable (slightly better) horsepower numbers to the emissions choked carbs of the late 70s, but it wasn't a massive gain (GM was reading TPI and the L98 at the time). The crossfire shortblocks weren't anything to be proud of either - small emissions cams and small valves...
While I like my crossfire cars today - I can't imagine owning one without WinALDL, and the ability to change proms, etc. Not to mention that GM didn't have larger injectors available at the time (to my knowledge, I could be wrong....)
Its taken 20 years for the DIY community to really get a handle on the system - there never was any real aftermarket support like for TPI but there were MANY MANY more years of TPI.
And no, my crossfire cars don't misfire unless I do something stupid with my ignition system
Sigh....
Actually, it was more commonly called cease-fire injection
The 82 & 83 Camaros have hood flaps that open at WOT.
Some people obviously didn't realize that driving WOT in a pouring rain or with large amounts of water on your hood was a BAD idea. Can you say HYDROLOCK?
Being GM's first mass produced eletronic fuel injection didn't help - sure the system had comparable (slightly better) horsepower numbers to the emissions choked carbs of the late 70s, but it wasn't a massive gain (GM was reading TPI and the L98 at the time). The crossfire shortblocks weren't anything to be proud of either - small emissions cams and small valves...
While I like my crossfire cars today - I can't imagine owning one without WinALDL, and the ability to change proms, etc. Not to mention that GM didn't have larger injectors available at the time (to my knowledge, I could be wrong....)
Its taken 20 years for the DIY community to really get a handle on the system - there never was any real aftermarket support like for TPI but there were MANY MANY more years of TPI.
And no, my crossfire cars don't misfire unless I do something stupid with my ignition system
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Car: 83 Crossfire Z28; 82 Crossfire Corvette; 68 455 Firebird
What I mean is that today, there are excellent tools for working with GM fuel injection that didn't exist 20 years ago.
Had I bought the car new, then a year later installed a new cam & some heads on it, I wouldn't have the diagnostic and reprogramming tools to understand where to make changes and then be able to alter my VE tables, etc. I'm not even sure what year Hypertech, Jet, etc started making custom proms.
Its easy for me to see why hotrodders would have hated CFI, but loved TPI - they installed new cam & heads, and the MAF's ability to understand the airflow kept the tune pretty reasonable.
Again, not saying one is better than the other, just explaining how I thought the reputation started.
Winaldl is a free program that hooks to the ALDL post and logs the ECM data stream.
CLICK HERE FOR THE WINALDL SITE
Had I bought the car new, then a year later installed a new cam & some heads on it, I wouldn't have the diagnostic and reprogramming tools to understand where to make changes and then be able to alter my VE tables, etc. I'm not even sure what year Hypertech, Jet, etc started making custom proms.
Its easy for me to see why hotrodders would have hated CFI, but loved TPI - they installed new cam & heads, and the MAF's ability to understand the airflow kept the tune pretty reasonable.
Again, not saying one is better than the other, just explaining how I thought the reputation started.
Winaldl is a free program that hooks to the ALDL post and logs the ECM data stream.
CLICK HERE FOR THE WINALDL SITE
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Anchorage,Ak
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 5.7L stock
Transmission: 700r4
I had an 83 crossfire a few years ago. I learned alot of stuff on that car. That was my introduction to computer cars. I did replace the engine with a 350 and put a set 882 casting heads with 2.20 intake valves on it. They were rebuilt units from PAW. I agree about porting the intake. I couldn't believe how tiny those things were when I took the manifold off. I opened them up quite a bit, but was careful not to over do it so I wouldn't loose the bottom end driveability. Then I stuffed a Comp cams emissions cam in there at about .454 lift( I don't remember all of the other specs) . Then I rebuilt the throttle bodies and took all the emissions stuff off. I was still running that sucky stock exhaust and no chip. The car felt a ton better with the 350, but I could tell that the crossfire was choking it. No upper RPM, but good bottom low and mid. It was a one wheeler peeler too. The one time I took it to the track I got a best time of 15.09 with a ton of wheel spin and a very tired 700r4. So I t would have been a solid 14 second car as is if the tires would hook up. It did better than I thought it would. That was running on Comp T/A ZR's with 16" Centerline billet stars. I was considering the set up from Turbo City with the revised manifold and bigger throttle bodies along with the new computer, but never did. I wonder how that all would have worked out? They said it was capable of handling 450 HP but I wasn't exactly sold on that. Good luck on your car .
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: Orangevale, CA
Car: 07 Silverado
Engine: 5.3L V8, flexfuel E85
Transmission: 4spd. Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locking diff.
Originally posted by ColdGTA
I had an 83 crossfire a few years ago. I learned alot of stuff on that car. That was my introduction to computer cars. I did replace the engine with a 350 and put a set 882 casting heads with 2.20 intake valves on it. They were rebuilt units from PAW. I agree about porting the intake. I couldn't believe how tiny those things were when I took the manifold off. I opened them up quite a bit, but was careful not to over do it so I wouldn't loose the bottom end driveability. Then I stuffed a Comp cams emissions cam in there at about .454 lift( I don't remember all of the other specs) . Then I rebuilt the throttle bodies and took all the emissions stuff off. I was still running that sucky stock exhaust and no chip. The car felt a ton better with the 350, but I could tell that the crossfire was choking it. No upper RPM, but good bottom low and mid. It was a one wheeler peeler too. The one time I took it to the track I got a best time of 15.09 with a ton of wheel spin and a very tired 700r4. So I t would have been a solid 14 second car as is if the tires would hook up. It did better than I thought it would. That was running on Comp T/A ZR's with 16" Centerline billet stars. I was considering the set up from Turbo City with the revised manifold and bigger throttle bodies along with the new computer, but never did. I wonder how that all would have worked out? They said it was capable of handling 450 HP but I wasn't exactly sold on that. Good luck on your car .
I had an 83 crossfire a few years ago. I learned alot of stuff on that car. That was my introduction to computer cars. I did replace the engine with a 350 and put a set 882 casting heads with 2.20 intake valves on it. They were rebuilt units from PAW. I agree about porting the intake. I couldn't believe how tiny those things were when I took the manifold off. I opened them up quite a bit, but was careful not to over do it so I wouldn't loose the bottom end driveability. Then I stuffed a Comp cams emissions cam in there at about .454 lift( I don't remember all of the other specs) . Then I rebuilt the throttle bodies and took all the emissions stuff off. I was still running that sucky stock exhaust and no chip. The car felt a ton better with the 350, but I could tell that the crossfire was choking it. No upper RPM, but good bottom low and mid. It was a one wheeler peeler too. The one time I took it to the track I got a best time of 15.09 with a ton of wheel spin and a very tired 700r4. So I t would have been a solid 14 second car as is if the tires would hook up. It did better than I thought it would. That was running on Comp T/A ZR's with 16" Centerline billet stars. I was considering the set up from Turbo City with the revised manifold and bigger throttle bodies along with the new computer, but never did. I wonder how that all would have worked out? They said it was capable of handling 450 HP but I wasn't exactly sold on that. Good luck on your car .
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Car: 83 Crossfire Z28; 82 Crossfire Corvette; 68 455 Firebird
Head over to the Crossfire Injection Vault - there are serious DIY solutions that should be way less expensive than the Turbo City setup. For example, I'm installing 2" throttle bodies this week - there is a board member that bores them and installs new plates for less than $150!
My board name is the same on that forum - look for my posts and you can see updates over the last year as I took my camaro from stock through a series of upgrades, including a new motor.
Its still WAY lean up top (got the new wideband o2 sensor last week) so the new tb's & injectors should really help...
Anyway - if you have any questions, or want pics, etc - just let me know.
Ian
My board name is the same on that forum - look for my posts and you can see updates over the last year as I took my camaro from stock through a series of upgrades, including a new motor.
Its still WAY lean up top (got the new wideband o2 sensor last week) so the new tb's & injectors should really help...
Anyway - if you have any questions, or want pics, etc - just let me know.
Ian
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: Orangevale, CA
Car: 07 Silverado
Engine: 5.3L V8, flexfuel E85
Transmission: 4spd. Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locking diff.
Originally posted by chevyhacker
Head over to the Crossfire Injection Vault - there are serious DIY solutions that should be way less expensive than the Turbo City setup. For example, I'm installing 2" throttle bodies this week - there is a board member that bores them and installs new plates for less than $150!
My board name is the same on that forum - look for my posts and you can see updates over the last year as I took my camaro from stock through a series of upgrades, including a new motor.
Its still WAY lean up top (got the new wideband o2 sensor last week) so the new tb's & injectors should really help...
Anyway - if you have any questions, or want pics, etc - just let me know.
Ian
Head over to the Crossfire Injection Vault - there are serious DIY solutions that should be way less expensive than the Turbo City setup. For example, I'm installing 2" throttle bodies this week - there is a board member that bores them and installs new plates for less than $150!
My board name is the same on that forum - look for my posts and you can see updates over the last year as I took my camaro from stock through a series of upgrades, including a new motor.
Its still WAY lean up top (got the new wideband o2 sensor last week) so the new tb's & injectors should really help...
Anyway - if you have any questions, or want pics, etc - just let me know.
Ian
Junior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Car: 83 Crossfire Z28; 82 Crossfire Corvette; 68 455 Firebird
Yes, there aren't many active crossfire camaro members - just PM me if you need anything, I can tell you if there are any differences for the f-body...
Ian
Ian
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: Orangevale, CA
Car: 07 Silverado
Engine: 5.3L V8, flexfuel E85
Transmission: 4spd. Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.73 locking diff.
Originally posted by chevyhacker
Yes, there aren't many active crossfire camaro members - just PM me if you need anything, I can tell you if there are any differences for the f-body...
Ian
Yes, there aren't many active crossfire camaro members - just PM me if you need anything, I can tell you if there are any differences for the f-body...
Ian
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92projectcamaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 18, 2016 08:00 AM





