'96 LT1 ,few questions
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 350 LT1
Transmission: T56
'96 LT1 ,few questions
with the Al heads, can you run these with a carb?
if i have choice of AL heads 96LT1 from TA or 96ish LT1 w/ Cast Iron heads form a caprice. which should i go for? I understand TA engine is 275hp and caprice is 265. but which is better in the long run?
vortec heads and LT1s worth it?
thanks
if i have choice of AL heads 96LT1 from TA or 96ish LT1 w/ Cast Iron heads form a caprice. which should i go for? I understand TA engine is 275hp and caprice is 265. but which is better in the long run?
vortec heads and LT1s worth it?
thanks
Originally posted by f-crazy
the cappy and f-bod used the same heads but a different cam...any LT1 head will work with a carbed intake
the cappy and f-bod used the same heads but a different cam...any LT1 head will work with a carbed intake
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
well actually, the f-bods shared the iron heads with the cars u listed, and also had aluminum heads...all the vettes were aluminum
damn near every year the cam changed for the LT1 motors...the hottest LT1 cam was the 94 z28...the LT4 cam was the same but with 1.6 rockers
the intake from scoggin dickey was 239 shipped
(same price for the LT1 intake but different part#)
i have a carbed LT4 motor
damn near every year the cam changed for the LT1 motors...the hottest LT1 cam was the 94 z28...the LT4 cam was the same but with 1.6 rockers
the intake from scoggin dickey was 239 shipped
(same price for the LT1 intake but different part#)
i have a carbed LT4 motor
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by f-crazy
well actually, the f-bods shared the iron heads with the cars u listed, and also had aluminum heads...all the vettes were aluminum
damn near every year the cam changed for the LT1 motors...the hottest LT1 cam was the 94 z28...the LT4 cam was the same but with 1.6 rockers
the intake from scoggin dickey was 239 shipped
(same price for the LT1 intake but different part#)
i have a carbed LT4 motor
well actually, the f-bods shared the iron heads with the cars u listed, and also had aluminum heads...all the vettes were aluminum
damn near every year the cam changed for the LT1 motors...the hottest LT1 cam was the 94 z28...the LT4 cam was the same but with 1.6 rockers
the intake from scoggin dickey was 239 shipped
(same price for the LT1 intake but different part#)
i have a carbed LT4 motor
B-body LT1's had a milder cam, but had more torque down low.
The LT4 cams are different than the LT1 cam.
Here is great info site about the LT1's
http://www.automotiverebuilder.com/ar/ar99928.htm
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 350 LT1
Transmission: T56
there is about $100 in the diff from the iron to Al. im thinking, i can bolt a carb up to the lt1, with a different intake of course and i'd be off to the races so to speak.. cheap.
And do some more LT1 research. You'll find that the iron heads actually flow better than the aluminum ones (at least on the intake side), so you can save a few bucks, have better flow, and will be able to enlarge the valves without having to install seat inserts (as you would with aluminum heads).
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Wellington, Kansas
Car: 92Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: A4
You can go up to 2.00/1.55 valve size (stock is 1.94/1.5) on the stock seat rings on the aluminum heads, anything larger and they will need replaced. The aluminum ones flow very good with the 2.00/1.55 valves and full porting.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by Vader
And do some more LT1 research. You'll find that the iron heads actually flow better than the aluminum ones (at least on the intake side), so you can save a few bucks, have better flow, and will be able to enlarge the valves without having to install seat inserts (as you would with aluminum heads).
And do some more LT1 research. You'll find that the iron heads actually flow better than the aluminum ones (at least on the intake side), so you can save a few bucks, have better flow, and will be able to enlarge the valves without having to install seat inserts (as you would with aluminum heads).

When I got my LT4 heads in the mail, I thought the boxes were empty since I didn't realize they weighed so little.
They do look pretty though,

The LT4 intake is red, not pink like in the picture. You can blame my camera for the color shift.
Last edited by Zepher; Jan 19, 2004 at 02:53 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by f-crazy
manny...what is the casting number on that set?...
manny...what is the casting number on that set?...
Originally posted by Zepher
Does the increased flow outweigh the 50lbs in weight?
Does the increased flow outweigh the 50lbs in weight?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by Vader
My bare iron LT1 heads weighed out at just over 39 pounds each after porting and machining. That's a whopping 18 pounds each more per pair than bare aluminum castings, according to GMPP. Unless you're using aluminum bolts, springs, valves, studs, that's not a 50 pound difference. I even used titanium retainers and locks, and lightweight Manley SS valves, so I'm thinking my iron heads (assembled) are a lot closer to stock aluminum than you might think. The 2.02/1.60 valves and 196CC ports are probably worth that extra 35 or so pounds, yes. I could have gone over the top and installed 2.10/1.74 valves in those iron heads, but it still has to be street reliable. Gaining 80HP on a car that already weighs 4,400 pounds with no driver is better than shaving 35 pounds for no power gain. I can take out my spare tire and do better than that. I took a serious look at LT4 heads, but couldn't justify the cost for the negligible gain over ported oron heads.
My bare iron LT1 heads weighed out at just over 39 pounds each after porting and machining. That's a whopping 18 pounds each more per pair than bare aluminum castings, according to GMPP. Unless you're using aluminum bolts, springs, valves, studs, that's not a 50 pound difference. I even used titanium retainers and locks, and lightweight Manley SS valves, so I'm thinking my iron heads (assembled) are a lot closer to stock aluminum than you might think. The 2.02/1.60 valves and 196CC ports are probably worth that extra 35 or so pounds, yes. I could have gone over the top and installed 2.10/1.74 valves in those iron heads, but it still has to be street reliable. Gaining 80HP on a car that already weighs 4,400 pounds with no driver is better than shaving 35 pounds for no power gain. I can take out my spare tire and do better than that. I took a serious look at LT4 heads, but couldn't justify the cost for the negligible gain over ported oron heads.
I'll weigh a set of LT1 aluminum heads with springs and rockers on them tomorrow to see what each complete head weighs exactly.
How much weight does porting take off the heads since those will be the ones I will be weighing.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
Originally posted by Vader
My bare iron LT1 heads weighed out at just over 39 pounds each after porting and machining. That's a whopping 18 pounds each more per pair than bare aluminum castings, according to GMPP. Unless you're using aluminum bolts, springs, valves, studs, that's not a 50 pound difference. I even used titanium retainers and locks, and lightweight Manley SS valves, so I'm thinking my iron heads (assembled) are a lot closer to stock aluminum than you might think. The 2.02/1.60 valves and 196CC ports are probably worth that extra 35 or so pounds, yes. I could have gone over the top and installed 2.10/1.74 valves in those iron heads, but it still has to be street reliable. Gaining 80HP on a car that already weighs 4,400 pounds with no driver is better than shaving 35 pounds for no power gain. I can take out my spare tire and do better than that. I took a serious look at LT4 heads, but couldn't justify the cost for the negligible gain over ported oron heads.
My bare iron LT1 heads weighed out at just over 39 pounds each after porting and machining. That's a whopping 18 pounds each more per pair than bare aluminum castings, according to GMPP. Unless you're using aluminum bolts, springs, valves, studs, that's not a 50 pound difference. I even used titanium retainers and locks, and lightweight Manley SS valves, so I'm thinking my iron heads (assembled) are a lot closer to stock aluminum than you might think. The 2.02/1.60 valves and 196CC ports are probably worth that extra 35 or so pounds, yes. I could have gone over the top and installed 2.10/1.74 valves in those iron heads, but it still has to be street reliable. Gaining 80HP on a car that already weighs 4,400 pounds with no driver is better than shaving 35 pounds for no power gain. I can take out my spare tire and do better than that. I took a serious look at LT4 heads, but couldn't justify the cost for the negligible gain over ported oron heads.
i think your ride needs a diet lol....think about it this way vader,...ported LT1 heads will flow almost the same as LT4's correct?....do the same port job on the LT4's and you maay change your mind? =)
theres a local CNC shop not to far from me and its mearly coincidence that when i took my heads there to see what he could do with them, he had a set of freshly CNC'd LT4's sitting there..after he showed me they flowed 29x some odd CFM and 230 exhaust, i was happy i bought these...granted its a 800 dollar port job, but those type of numbers will support what? 600 ponies N/A....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









