What is better HP or Torque
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 90 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Torque is what allows a car to move forward. Horsepower is what allows the car to run at a higher speed. For our cars, torque is the best. The higher torque, the better you are off the line. Generally, you will find cars with higher horsepower compared to torque which allows cars to be faster once moving, but the torque gives that initial push. Its the same thing as winding a rubber band.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
From: Winston salem, NC
Car: 1987 1SICIROC.....1999 TransAm
Engine: 385 HSR.....LS1
Transmission: 700R4 with Midwest 3400 2.4str...M6
Axle/Gears: SLP Zexel Posi unit 3.42's...3.73's
like sombody told me...TQ gets you off the line, HP wins the race.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
TQ gets you off the line, HP wins the race.
yikes, i can just see all the BS thats going to get posted in this thread.
Last edited by scottland; Mar 30, 2004 at 09:59 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
From: Dixon, IL
Car: RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
well, at least we should be able to agree that a heavier car needs more torque than a lighter car
to answer one of the questions (generally speaking) :
Big Torque = lots of cubes, and long stroke
Big HP= lots of cubs, and a short stroke
to answer one of the questions (generally speaking) :
Big Torque = lots of cubes, and long stroke
Big HP= lots of cubs, and a short stroke
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Yes the BS will get deep. To put it bluntly you want both. Torque is great but if you have no way of building over time as fast as possible (HP) than your car will be slow. Torque is what moves your car, but HP is how fast you build it over time. You could put a semi motor in your 3rd gen and it would be slow because it doesn't have much HP to build all that torque in a short time increment.
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 983
Likes: 55
From: Nebraska
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt
While the stroke may have some bearing on the RPM range of the engine, it is not nearly as important as the heads/cam/intake combination. For instance, I could build two different 350s, one with TPI/Vortec/Hotcam, and one with MiniRam/AFR210s/XR288HR, these engines have the same stroke, but completely different powerbands and RPM ranges. Anyway, for this latest incarnation of the infamous low vs top end arguement, I have to say neither is 'better', its a matter of preference and intended use of the car.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
Originally posted by formularpm
While the stroke may have some bearing on the RPM range of the engine, it is not nearly as important as the heads/cam/intake combination. For instance, I could build two different 350s, one with TPI/Vortec/Hotcam, and one with MiniRam/AFR210s/XR288HR, these engines have the same stroke, but completely different powerbands and RPM ranges. Anyway, for this latest incarnation of the infamous low vs top end arguement, I have to say neither is 'better', its a matter of preference and intended use of the car.
While the stroke may have some bearing on the RPM range of the engine, it is not nearly as important as the heads/cam/intake combination. For instance, I could build two different 350s, one with TPI/Vortec/Hotcam, and one with MiniRam/AFR210s/XR288HR, these engines have the same stroke, but completely different powerbands and RPM ranges. Anyway, for this latest incarnation of the infamous low vs top end arguement, I have to say neither is 'better', its a matter of preference and intended use of the car.
There really isn't any easy way gerneralize horsepower and torque, esspecially without any idea as to what its regarding.
There simply is too much to it.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
I say, depending on what you wish to achieve with the engine, they have an equally important role. For many people, they want to get off the line quickly. Once they are off the line, they want to be able to move from point "A" to point "B" in a rapid manner. Considering as how torque is a rotational force, that is what gets us off the line. The more torque, the easier it is to get off the line, obviously (more tq = more rotational force = more force applied to the tires to get them to spin).
Now once you GET moving, you want to be able to get from point to point in haste. Consider how horsepower is work per unit time (1 hp = ~33,000 ft-lbs/min). So the more hp you are putting down, the more work your engine can do. The more work your engine can do, the faster you will get from point "A" to point "B."
This is why towing vehicles are concentrated on TQ (they need to be able to PULL) and NASCAR focuses on HP (they need to get from the starting line to the starting line the fastest). For them, look at the camshafts. They make either the High RPM power or the low end grunt. Cylinder heads, while an important part of the engines RPM powerband, are nothing more than channels for supplying air to the engine. They may be a limiting FACTOR due to port design which HINDERS the upper RPM efficiency. But in the end, it is the camshaft that opens the valves, keeps them open, then shuts them.
So, in MY books, get good heads. Get a cam to match what you want out of the engine. Then by a carb and intake to supply air. But a blend of low end grund and high end power is ideal. 383/400 fits the bill nicely (when properly built)
Now once you GET moving, you want to be able to get from point to point in haste. Consider how horsepower is work per unit time (1 hp = ~33,000 ft-lbs/min). So the more hp you are putting down, the more work your engine can do. The more work your engine can do, the faster you will get from point "A" to point "B."
This is why towing vehicles are concentrated on TQ (they need to be able to PULL) and NASCAR focuses on HP (they need to get from the starting line to the starting line the fastest). For them, look at the camshafts. They make either the High RPM power or the low end grunt. Cylinder heads, while an important part of the engines RPM powerband, are nothing more than channels for supplying air to the engine. They may be a limiting FACTOR due to port design which HINDERS the upper RPM efficiency. But in the end, it is the camshaft that opens the valves, keeps them open, then shuts them.
So, in MY books, get good heads. Get a cam to match what you want out of the engine. Then by a carb and intake to supply air. But a blend of low end grund and high end power is ideal. 383/400 fits the bill nicely (when properly built)
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 3
From: GO PACK GO
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 1985 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Thanks for all the info. YOU GUYS ROCK
. The reason that I asked was that I was under the impression that the 85 305 was the best 305 of all the years but I guess it depends on how you look at it. I have the 85 with the 342 rear end and I have a 89 with (I think) a 323 rear and the eighty five will leave the 89 in the dust..
. The reason that I asked was that I was under the impression that the 85 305 was the best 305 of all the years but I guess it depends on how you look at it. I have the 85 with the 342 rear end and I have a 89 with (I think) a 323 rear and the eighty five will leave the 89 in the dust.. Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'm not going to let this live because it is bound to get ugly. The link gives a pretty good story.
As to your '85 vs. '89, here's another story: https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml . The '85 TPI has 215 HP @ 4400, 275 lbs-ft @ 3200. The '89 (assuming it is an LO3) has 170 HP @ 4000, 255 lbs-ft @ 2400. If it's actually an LB9, it's 195 @ 4000, 295 @ 2800.
And, the '89 probably doesn't have 3.23's, but 2.73's. It's got less power, less torque (unless LB9), and worse gears. It loses to the '85 on all counts.
As to your '85 vs. '89, here's another story: https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml . The '85 TPI has 215 HP @ 4400, 275 lbs-ft @ 3200. The '89 (assuming it is an LO3) has 170 HP @ 4000, 255 lbs-ft @ 2400. If it's actually an LB9, it's 195 @ 4000, 295 @ 2800.
And, the '89 probably doesn't have 3.23's, but 2.73's. It's got less power, less torque (unless LB9), and worse gears. It loses to the '85 on all counts.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
no green
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 9, 2016 09:22 PM






