Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Please Help Me!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #1  
BAD91CamaroRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: missouri
Car: 91 Camaro RS 383
Engine: carbed 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Please Help Me!!!!!!

OK i just got this new starter from NAPA and i think its defective. It worked fine for about a week then today it started grinding away... it still starts the car but i dont want to because i dont want to ruin my new flexplate. Anyways you think something internal in the starter is bad? Any comments will be appreciated
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #2  
Jay's Avatar
Jay
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Newington, CT
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10
did you check to make sure the bolts are still tight?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #3  
Stekman's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
You got the right one, right? (I.e. 153 or 168 tooth?)

Is it NEW new or just reman'd new?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #4  
USA_Rally's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 92 Rally
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
i had the starter go out on my 95 ford ranger. I got a replacement from napa and it was defective, i took it back and got a new one, it also was defective, took it back and got another and it was defective, took it back and made them give me the best starter they had (which was a borg warner) for no additional cost and i haven't had any problems with it in about 3 years. this is a no b/s story. 3 defective starters in a row from napa. I love napa but there cheaper starters suck!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #5  
89_IROC_98U's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Stekman
You got the right one, right? (I.e. 153 or 168 tooth?)

Is it NEW new or just reman'd new?
My guess, and it's just that, is that he got the right one if it worked fine for a week before it crapped out; I would think that if the tooth count wasn't correct it would've had problems from day one...or at least had sporadic problems before grinding.

I'll second Jay's post and make sure the bolts are still tight.

- 89_IROC

PS - No flame intended, Stekman; I'm just looking at this from a logical perspective; we all know, of course, that cars aren't logical
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 07:03 PM
  #6  
BAD91CamaroRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: missouri
Car: 91 Camaro RS 383
Engine: carbed 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
well i got them to give me another starter and it works great... lets see how long it lasts though
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 12:38 AM
  #7  
USA_Rally's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 92 Rally
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
keep the reciept! lol!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 12:59 AM
  #8  
Stekman's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Originally posted by 89_IROC_98U
My guess, and it's just that, is that he got the right one if it worked fine for a week before it crapped out; I would think that if the tooth count wasn't correct it would've had problems from day one...or at least had sporadic problems before grinding.

I'll second Jay's post and make sure the bolts are still tight.

- 89_IROC

PS - No flame intended, Stekman; I'm just looking at this from a logical perspective; we all know, of course, that cars aren't logical
Good point. I wasn't thinking.

And you're right, cars aren't logical. They are big, heavy, money robbing, time wasting, energy spending, significant other-maker-mad-at-you, metallic beasts of burden.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 01:08 AM
  #9  
kretos's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
napa is good for one thing, cheap parts and cheap prices. always get the best they have in stock of whatever your looking for, and keep the reciept
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 05:20 PM
  #10  
89_IROC_98U's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Stekman
Good point. I wasn't thinking.

And you're right, cars aren't logical. They are big, heavy, money robbing, time wasting, energy spending, significant other-maker-mad-at-you, metallic beasts of burden.
Lord knows that I'm familiar with that stuff! I'd be a millionaire with a happy wife (there isn't necessarily a correlation between the two, either) if it weren't for my IROC. However, I wouldn't be happy without the IROC

While we're speaking of money-robbing cars, I wonder if the original poster got the starter issue fixed. Meanwhile, back at the ranch...

- 89_IROC
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2004 | 07:09 PM
  #11  
65panhed's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 1
From: OKC Oklahoma
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: L69 305 HO
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: Auburn pro yukon 3.73 gears and axl
Did you use the shims that should have come in the box with the starter? you might want to experiment with those........
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.