OBD1 Read-Out Analysis Wanted!
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Car: Caprice
Engine: 5.0 305 LO3
Transmission: 2004-R
Need Help w/ OBD1 Readout
Hi guys, I finally got a chance to borrow my friend's scanner. The purpose of this scan was to figure out why my car idles rough, and possibly why there is detonation.
The motor is an 89 LO3 5.0 TBI V8. It has 70k on it, 30k granny throughout 12 years, 40k teenager throughout 3 years. Its timing is at 4 degrees advanced. It also has true dual exhaust which causes a Code 32 on the highway since the EGR valve isnt opening. I need to get a neg backpressure valve to solve this.
I started the car, and it does the usual high-idle thing until its "warm." It then stops at around 550-675 rpm for a while until the t-stat opens at 160 degrees and it rises to 750 rpm. Right after the high idle, the rpms are not steady and the car runs a little rough. After it hits 750 rpm, the idle is still sort of rough but the rpms are steady.
I did a readout of the Scanner Results and here they are:
PROM C -------- 381
Air Switch Solenoid -------- OFF
Loop Status -------- Closed (was mostly closed even though car was warmed up past 180 degrees)
Rich Lean Flag ------- Mostly Lean
Async Mode -------- OFF
Learn Control Enabled
Manifold Air Temp ------ 104 degrees
Block Learn
Knock Sensor -------- 73
Battery Volts -------- 14 volts
Oxygen Sensor -------- 500's (While idle was rough, jumped from 400's to 800's.)
Integrater ------- 182
Throttle Sensor -------- 0.66 volts
Engine RPM ------- 750 rpm (Was in 600's before tstat openend)
MAP Sensor ----- 1.09 volts
Coolant Temp ---------- 177 degrees
Idle Hi Motor Pos ------- 39 steps
Air Divert Solenoid ------ ON
Is there anyone here that can help me out decipher if these readings are normal? I have performed regular maintenance and its all in good order. I really need to get this figured out since I'm out of ideas. Thank you for your time.
Adam
The motor is an 89 LO3 5.0 TBI V8. It has 70k on it, 30k granny throughout 12 years, 40k teenager throughout 3 years. Its timing is at 4 degrees advanced. It also has true dual exhaust which causes a Code 32 on the highway since the EGR valve isnt opening. I need to get a neg backpressure valve to solve this.
I started the car, and it does the usual high-idle thing until its "warm." It then stops at around 550-675 rpm for a while until the t-stat opens at 160 degrees and it rises to 750 rpm. Right after the high idle, the rpms are not steady and the car runs a little rough. After it hits 750 rpm, the idle is still sort of rough but the rpms are steady.
I did a readout of the Scanner Results and here they are:
PROM C -------- 381
Air Switch Solenoid -------- OFF
Loop Status -------- Closed (was mostly closed even though car was warmed up past 180 degrees)
Rich Lean Flag ------- Mostly Lean
Async Mode -------- OFF
Learn Control Enabled
Manifold Air Temp ------ 104 degrees
Block Learn
Knock Sensor -------- 73
Battery Volts -------- 14 volts
Oxygen Sensor -------- 500's (While idle was rough, jumped from 400's to 800's.)
Integrater ------- 182
Throttle Sensor -------- 0.66 volts
Engine RPM ------- 750 rpm (Was in 600's before tstat openend)
MAP Sensor ----- 1.09 volts
Coolant Temp ---------- 177 degrees
Idle Hi Motor Pos ------- 39 steps
Air Divert Solenoid ------ ON
Is there anyone here that can help me out decipher if these readings are normal? I have performed regular maintenance and its all in good order. I really need to get this figured out since I'm out of ideas. Thank you for your time.
Adam
Last edited by Annihilator; Sep 12, 2004 at 11:47 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
An integrator of 182 indicates that the computer really wants to richen the mixture (no BLM but even with one cell it doesnt give much indication of the overall fueling as teh ecm sees it). Other then that it looks normal. Get winaldl or some other scanning software so you can actually datalog.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 10
From: conway, s.c.
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Well, your TPS voltage is a little high and are you sure that you have your timing set at 4 degrees advanced? That seems to be off a bit!!!!
And you are getting a lot of knock counts there, should be between 0 & 1.
And you are getting a lot of knock counts there, should be between 0 & 1. Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
The xmitted knock is actually just the msb of the knock counter so that number is total counts detected/256. It really doesnt tell much unless you can see what the knock counter is doing while the car is running. It could have just picked up the 18,688 knock counts while the motor was cranking, or you could have a detonation problem.
This is why you need to get a datalogging system going. You really cant see much just from one frame.
This is why you need to get a datalogging system going. You really cant see much just from one frame.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Car: Caprice
Engine: 5.0 305 LO3
Transmission: 2004-R
I have a 14 second stream of the data and the knock stayed at 73 after the crank and didnt move.
And yes, I made sure that the timing was at 4 degrees advanced. It WAS retarded a bunch and the detonation was still there.
Also, isn't the loop status supposed to be open after the car is warm?
And yes, I made sure that the timing was at 4 degrees advanced. It WAS retarded a bunch and the detonation was still there.
Also, isn't the loop status supposed to be open after the car is warm?
Last edited by Annihilator; Sep 13, 2004 at 12:26 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: UCIrvine or SFV, CA
Car: 1999 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LS1 - 346 ci
Transmission: 4L60E
Originally posted by Annihilator
Also, isn't the loop status supposed to be open after the car is warm?
Also, isn't the loop status supposed to be open after the car is warm?
Closed loop is when it reads data from the O2 sensor and MAF etc...
Think of it as a circuit, open means the sensor (O2, MAF etc.) data doesn't pass through while in closed loop the data reaches the ECM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
It should start in open loop and then after around six minutes go into closed loop. Pretty much in open loop the computer will ignore the O2 readings and just command whatever afr is set at the time.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, WA
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
Possibly a bad CTS sending a false signal to the computer telling it the car has warmed up enough to go into closed loop?
Anyway, just a thought.
Anyway, just a thought.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, WA
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
Well was just a thought.
Something you can check that caused me no end of problems and lots of money is the ground wires on the back of the left cylinder head. Had corrision on the crimped on ring terminal. I replaced the connector, soldered it, end of problems for me.
I realize my set of problems were different from yours, but still worth checking to make sure the computer has a good ground connection.
Good luck.
Something you can check that caused me no end of problems and lots of money is the ground wires on the back of the left cylinder head. Had corrision on the crimped on ring terminal. I replaced the connector, soldered it, end of problems for me.
I realize my set of problems were different from yours, but still worth checking to make sure the computer has a good ground connection.
Good luck.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Car: Caprice
Engine: 5.0 305 LO3
Transmission: 2004-R
Sounds good, I'll check em. I also have an extra computer that I will install. Whats very interesting is that there is a label on my computer that says it was refurbished from GM. I bought the car with 30k original so its weird. I do have an extra computer that I will install and see what it does. Thanks
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Is your scantool putting the ecm into ALDL or any other mode? Looking at my calibration, I seem to remember that in ALDL mode, closed loop will be forced.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, WA
Car: 87 IROC-Z28
Engine: 305 TPI-New 355 on the engine stand
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Eaton posi-Soon a 9" Ford!
Originally posted by dimented24x7
Is your scantool putting the ecm into ALDL or any other mode? Looking at my calibration, I seem to remember that in ALDL mode, closed loop will be forced.
Is your scantool putting the ecm into ALDL or any other mode? Looking at my calibration, I seem to remember that in ALDL mode, closed loop will be forced.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Power Adders
634
Apr 30, 2019 12:14 PM
thefirebirdm@n
South Central Region
3
Sep 14, 2015 01:45 PM






