Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Cam break in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 09:58 PM
  #1  
ditchbangr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Minny
Car: One of 5
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Cam break in

I am building a TFS headed 406 with a XE274 hydraulic flat tappet cam and planned on using crane full roller 1.6 rocker arms. I wanted to use these to get a little more duration and lift. I have watched mechanic friends break in flat tappet cams and feel comfortable doing it myself. I was just talking to a guy about my setup and he said that I shouldn't use the 1.6 rocker at all with the xtreme energy cam, he said they have such agressive ramps that the tappet will dig in. Especially on break in. I called comp cams and the tech said I shouldn't have any problems with what I currently have. For the record he said it wouldn't be a bad idea to use a 1.5 rocker to break the cam in.

Should I just use a regular old used set of 1.5 stockers to break the cam in and then swap over to the cranes. Or use the cranes from the get go. Thanks for any help
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #2  
Stekman's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
You will be fine. I would worry about proper break-in procedure far more than rocker ratios.

I don't see how rockers will affect anything for the break in. The only thing rockers really do is bring the pushrod closer towards the head. And if you look at it, there's nothing that can cause as far as lifters digging into the lobes. Either way, the lifter is confined to its bore. The pushrod seat is cupped so the pushrod itself can sit on an angle and not interfere with lifter motion. The only way you could cause digging into the lobes is by switching to a larger spring that would offer more "resistance" as the cam opens a valve. Consider: rockers do nothing more than convey the lobe profiles into valve openings. Think about how many people out there have broken in a flat tappet cam with aftermarket lifters...me being one of them.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 10:27 PM
  #3  
ditchbangr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Minny
Car: One of 5
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
I agree, just hoping I wasn't missing something with this XE cam that was different than other flat tappet cams.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 10:32 PM
  #4  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
You are cool to use them. SOmetimes, though, depending on cam and springs, you should use break in springs. You should be ok though.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 02:56 AM
  #5  
Chickenman35's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 896
Likes: 1
From: Coquitlam, BC
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73
Originally posted by Stekman
Snip:
I don't see how rockers will affect anything for the break in. The only thing rockers really do is bring the pushrod closer towards the head. Snip
Actually rocker ratio CAN affect cam breakin. The pressure on the cam lobe is increased by the same ratio that the valve lift is increased. So using a set of stock ratio rockers to break-in a flat tappet cam makes sense, particularily if it is a really big flat tappet cam.

In fact you will find that Comp Cams ( and others ) offer special " Break-in " rockers with ultra low ratios such as 1.2 to 1 to lessen the loads on the cam during break-in.

It is easier to swap in a set of low ratio rockers than to swap back and forth with " Break in " springs, when you're building a lot of engines. Another trick ( as mentioned ) is to break the cam in using only the outer springs on a dual spring setup. The more aggressive the cam and the stiffer the springs the more critical it is to either use low ratio rockers or remove the inner springs during cam break-in.

With an XE 274 I wouldn't be too worried.....although breaking in with the 1.5 ratio rockers woul be a good idea IMHO. Removing the inner springs during break-in certainly won't hurt anything that's for sure

BTW. Summit has an awesome spring compressor tool ( heads on car ) for only $49.95. Really slick and makes changing even " Triples" a breeze. Part #906784

Last edited by Chickenman35; Oct 7, 2004 at 02:59 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 05:48 AM
  #6  
ditchbangr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Minny
Car: One of 5
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Springs are stock TFS 195cc head 1.47 single spring. Good to .540 lift, with 1.6 I'd be right at .519.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2004 | 01:35 PM
  #7  
Chickenman35's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 896
Likes: 1
From: Coquitlam, BC
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73
Originally posted by ditchbangr
Springs are stock TFS 195cc head 1.47 single spring. Good to .540 lift, with 1.6 I'd be right at .519.
Well, don't plan on running more than 6,000 RPM....I doubt that a single spring is up to the task. Particularily with 1.6 ratio rockers and a Comp cam ( Agreesive ramps ). I'd think about getting some decent dual springs. I prefer Isky or Crane. Comps off the shelf units sometimes tend to be a bit on the soft side for the cams they use. Particularily if you are using a Cam that is at the upper range of a recommended spring package.

TFS has done the smae thing that Edelbrock did. Cheaped out on some of the components. Edelbrocks valve springs ( Performer RPM heads ) are supposed to be good to .550 lift....and they are. Trouble is that even with a fairly mild cam (218\228 @.050" ) I stated getting valve float at around 5,900 RPM. Mind you, I was running a hydraulic Roller lifter and those are rather porky. You might get away with it using a flat tappet cam....but keep the revs down.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jorlain
Tech / General Engine
6
Oct 8, 2015 01:57 AM
89-91fun
South West Region
5
Sep 12, 2015 03:06 PM
Ranbo108
Tech / General Engine
14
Sep 9, 2015 12:20 PM
Strick1
LTX and LSX
2
Sep 4, 2015 07:11 AM
z28guy134
Engine Swap
1
Sep 1, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.