Cam break in
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Minny
Car: One of 5
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Cam break in
I am building a TFS headed 406 with a XE274 hydraulic flat tappet cam and planned on using crane full roller 1.6 rocker arms. I wanted to use these to get a little more duration and lift. I have watched mechanic friends break in flat tappet cams and feel comfortable doing it myself. I was just talking to a guy about my setup and he said that I shouldn't use the 1.6 rocker at all with the xtreme energy cam, he said they have such agressive ramps that the tappet will dig in. Especially on break in. I called comp cams and the tech said I shouldn't have any problems with what I currently have. For the record he said it wouldn't be a bad idea to use a 1.5 rocker to break the cam in.
Should I just use a regular old used set of 1.5 stockers to break the cam in and then swap over to the cranes. Or use the cranes from the get go. Thanks for any help
Should I just use a regular old used set of 1.5 stockers to break the cam in and then swap over to the cranes. Or use the cranes from the get go. Thanks for any help
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
You will be fine. I would worry about proper break-in procedure far more than rocker ratios.
I don't see how rockers will affect anything for the break in. The only thing rockers really do is bring the pushrod closer towards the head. And if you look at it, there's nothing that can cause as far as lifters digging into the lobes. Either way, the lifter is confined to its bore. The pushrod seat is cupped so the pushrod itself can sit on an angle and not interfere with lifter motion. The only way you could cause digging into the lobes is by switching to a larger spring that would offer more "resistance" as the cam opens a valve. Consider: rockers do nothing more than convey the lobe profiles into valve openings. Think about how many people out there have broken in a flat tappet cam with aftermarket lifters...me being one of them.
I don't see how rockers will affect anything for the break in. The only thing rockers really do is bring the pushrod closer towards the head. And if you look at it, there's nothing that can cause as far as lifters digging into the lobes. Either way, the lifter is confined to its bore. The pushrod seat is cupped so the pushrod itself can sit on an angle and not interfere with lifter motion. The only way you could cause digging into the lobes is by switching to a larger spring that would offer more "resistance" as the cam opens a valve. Consider: rockers do nothing more than convey the lobe profiles into valve openings. Think about how many people out there have broken in a flat tappet cam with aftermarket lifters...me being one of them.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 896
Likes: 1
From: Coquitlam, BC
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73
Originally posted by Stekman
Snip:
I don't see how rockers will affect anything for the break in. The only thing rockers really do is bring the pushrod closer towards the head. Snip
Snip:
I don't see how rockers will affect anything for the break in. The only thing rockers really do is bring the pushrod closer towards the head. Snip
In fact you will find that Comp Cams ( and others ) offer special " Break-in " rockers with ultra low ratios such as 1.2 to 1 to lessen the loads on the cam during break-in.
It is easier to swap in a set of low ratio rockers than to swap back and forth with " Break in " springs, when you're building a lot of engines. Another trick ( as mentioned ) is to break the cam in using only the outer springs on a dual spring setup. The more aggressive the cam and the stiffer the springs the more critical it is to either use low ratio rockers or remove the inner springs during cam break-in.
With an XE 274 I wouldn't be too worried.....although breaking in with the 1.5 ratio rockers woul be a good idea IMHO. Removing the inner springs during break-in certainly won't hurt anything that's for sure
BTW. Summit has an awesome spring compressor tool ( heads on car ) for only $49.95. Really slick and makes changing even " Triples" a breeze. Part #906784
Last edited by Chickenman35; Oct 7, 2004 at 02:59 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 896
Likes: 1
From: Coquitlam, BC
Car: 86\92 Mutant
Engine: 355CI 430HP
Transmission: T-5 with mods
Axle/Gears: 7.625", Eaton Posi, 3.73
Originally posted by ditchbangr
Springs are stock TFS 195cc head 1.47 single spring. Good to .540 lift, with 1.6 I'd be right at .519.
Springs are stock TFS 195cc head 1.47 single spring. Good to .540 lift, with 1.6 I'd be right at .519.
TFS has done the smae thing that Edelbrock did. Cheaped out on some of the components. Edelbrocks valve springs ( Performer RPM heads ) are supposed to be good to .550 lift....and they are. Trouble is that even with a fairly mild cam (218\228 @.050" ) I stated getting valve float at around 5,900 RPM. Mind you, I was running a hydraulic Roller lifter and those are rather porky. You might get away with it using a flat tappet cam....but keep the revs down.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





