RPMs
Sounds like you are the lucky owner of a 2.77 rear.
------------------
1990 IROC 350
Mods: Too busy trying to make it run right to mod it.
Airfoil, Dynomax cat-back, MSD coil, 180 t-stat, Bald Eagle tires,
Hypertech fan switch, Accel 23# injectors, Holley module, ported plenum,
Ported Daytona Yellow stock base, Moroso valve covers, other stuff,
Streetdampr, Ruger P95DC, hot wife, new oil filter, !cats, !TBC, !AIR.
18.0 @ 85MPH since I'm one big-a$$ MF
"It's better to have and not need than to need and not have."
------------------
1990 IROC 350
Mods: Too busy trying to make it run right to mod it.
Airfoil, Dynomax cat-back, MSD coil, 180 t-stat, Bald Eagle tires,
Hypertech fan switch, Accel 23# injectors, Holley module, ported plenum,
Ported Daytona Yellow stock base, Moroso valve covers, other stuff,
Streetdampr, Ruger P95DC, hot wife, new oil filter, !cats, !TBC, !AIR.
18.0 @ 85MPH since I'm one big-a$$ MF
"It's better to have and not need than to need and not have."
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Coast
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
That sounds normal if it is an automatic. I do not know about the standard. My GTA will cruise at about 1600 RPM @ 55MPH on overdrive. At 80 MPH it will be about 2100 RPM.
Can't remember exactly the numbers but that is a ballpark figure.
This is with a 3.21 rearend.
[This message has been edited by Ozzy88GTA (edited September 08, 2001).]
Can't remember exactly the numbers but that is a ballpark figure.
This is with a 3.21 rearend.
[This message has been edited by Ozzy88GTA (edited September 08, 2001).]
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 92' Firebird Chick:
what is 2.77 rear?? is it good or bad?
</font>
what is 2.77 rear?? is it good or bad?
</font>
------------------
-Dan
-1990 3.1L RS
-Mods? no
-Slow? yes
-Currently collecting parts for T5 swap

Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by CaliCamaroRS:
Lower gears (numerically higher) such as 3.73:1 will offer ... lower gas milage.</font>
Lower gears (numerically higher) such as 3.73:1 will offer ... lower gas milage.</font>
92,
Jethro is on the right track - you have a low-ratio ring/pinion gear set. However, the 2.77:1 axle wasn't available in 1992, since the axles in that year were all Saginaw units, not Borg Warner. The ratio is probably 2.73:1.
That's great for cruising fuel economy, and for higher top-end, but not so good for accelleration. You can compensate for the low ratio by altering the stall characteristics of the torque converter, and still have decent highway fuel mileage. You and I are lucky enough to live where we can actually drive 70-80 MPH (or more if we feel like it) for hours on end without having to brake for a nine-lane-wide parking lot.
------------------
Later,
Vader
------------------
"Click - Click - BOOM!"
Adobe Acrobat Reader
[This message has been edited by Vader (edited September 09, 2001).]
Jethro is on the right track - you have a low-ratio ring/pinion gear set. However, the 2.77:1 axle wasn't available in 1992, since the axles in that year were all Saginaw units, not Borg Warner. The ratio is probably 2.73:1.
That's great for cruising fuel economy, and for higher top-end, but not so good for accelleration. You can compensate for the low ratio by altering the stall characteristics of the torque converter, and still have decent highway fuel mileage. You and I are lucky enough to live where we can actually drive 70-80 MPH (or more if we feel like it) for hours on end without having to brake for a nine-lane-wide parking lot.
------------------
Later,
Vader
------------------
"Click - Click - BOOM!"
Adobe Acrobat Reader
[This message has been edited by Vader (edited September 09, 2001).]
Trending Topics
With a 3.06 first gear in a 700R-4, it's way too easy to put in too big(numerically high) rear end. I have 3.08s, and don't plan on swapping any time soon, and wouldn''t think of going any more than 3.42-3.45. I'm assuming that the poster of this topic won't be hitting the strip often enough that would justify the change in mileage and what speed the power band is at. just my two cents
------------------
'84 Berlinetta, LG4, 700R-4, starwars interior, falling headliner, T/A t-handle shifter, trans cooler, more to come in time and $$ www.hipergp@aol.com
------------------
'84 Berlinetta, LG4, 700R-4, starwars interior, falling headliner, T/A t-handle shifter, trans cooler, more to come in time and $$ www.hipergp@aol.com
im assuming you have an automatic...im saying this because i have a LB9 w/ a 3.08 rear,and in 5th gear i run 80MPH at 2000rpms
if you do have an auto,yup you got 2.77's
Andy
------------------
The "House" has spoken...
check out my my 88 WS6 Trans Am
We are the seeds of legends,our true origins are unknown...WE SIMPLY ARE...
if you do have an auto,yup you got 2.77's
Andy
------------------
The "House" has spoken...
check out my my 88 WS6 Trans Am
We are the seeds of legends,our true origins are unknown...WE SIMPLY ARE...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM








