quesiton about lobe seperation
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
quesiton about lobe seperation
what kind of power difference do you get from a close number lobe like 115/115 and a number like 110/120 duration? how does it effect the powerband?
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
A cam with "115/115" and another cam with "110/120" lobe locations have the same LSA {Lobe separation angle} of 115Deg. But the second one is advanced in the motor by 5 degrees. Advancing the cam in the motor (relative to the crankshaft) will increase bottom end and mid range torque a little and reduce top end peak horsepower output a little.
Mostly because the intake valve will close sooner when advanced.
Generally, advancing the cam a little results in better overall performance.
Generally, but not always, this slight advancing is built in to the cam during manufacturering.
Mostly because the intake valve will close sooner when advanced.
Generally, advancing the cam a little results in better overall performance.
Generally, but not always, this slight advancing is built in to the cam during manufacturering.
Last edited by F-BIRD'88; Jul 7, 2005 at 11:21 AM.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
I wouldn't advance a 115 LSA cam with a SR, there is no need and it will take away any advantage you would gain from the SR.
In fact you should change to cam to receive an advantage to at least 113 LSA.
In fact you should change to cam to receive an advantage to at least 113 LSA.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Originally posted by Dyno Don
I wouldn't advance a 115 LSA cam with a SR, there is no need and it will take away any advantage you would gain from the SR.
In fact you should change to cam to receive an advantage to at least 113 LSA.
I wouldn't advance a 115 LSA cam with a SR, there is no need and it will take away any advantage you would gain from the SR.
In fact you should change to cam to receive an advantage to at least 113 LSA.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
SR?
So those two cams mentioned, are the same cam, just one would be advanced (degreed?) 5 degrees when installed?
Would this also make sense to get a cam with more overlap, in order to get higher lift, then advance it to bring the powerband back down lower?
(ie a cam with typically more lift would have more duration, and therefore works best at say 2200-7000RPM or something, if you degree it more advanced, could you get a 1400-6000RPM power band with high lift?)
So those two cams mentioned, are the same cam, just one would be advanced (degreed?) 5 degrees when installed?
Would this also make sense to get a cam with more overlap, in order to get higher lift, then advance it to bring the powerband back down lower?
(ie a cam with typically more lift would have more duration, and therefore works best at say 2200-7000RPM or something, if you degree it more advanced, could you get a 1400-6000RPM power band with high lift?)
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Originally posted by Sonix
SR?
So those two cams mentioned, are the same cam, just one would be advanced (degreed?) 5 degrees when installed?
Would this also make sense to get a cam with more overlap, in order to get higher lift, then advance it to bring the powerband back down lower?
(ie a cam with typically more lift would have more duration, and therefore works best at say 2200-7000RPM or something, if you degree it more advanced, could you get a 1400-6000RPM power band with high lift?)
SR?
So those two cams mentioned, are the same cam, just one would be advanced (degreed?) 5 degrees when installed?
Would this also make sense to get a cam with more overlap, in order to get higher lift, then advance it to bring the powerband back down lower?
(ie a cam with typically more lift would have more duration, and therefore works best at say 2200-7000RPM or something, if you degree it more advanced, could you get a 1400-6000RPM power band with high lift?)
A big cam will still be a big cam. Advancing it won't make it a small(er) cam.
Overlap is a function of the duration and lobe separation of a cams intake and exhaust lobe. It is independent of lift.
Smaller LSA number= more overlap. A small LSA does not nessessarily mean more low end torque. it generally does mean more peak torque. Usually the overall power curve is peaker too. Race cams with tight LSA like 104-106 Typical of circletrack and auto trans bracket racing cams work best with open headers and merge collectors. These cams are typically installed 4 to 6 degrees advanced as overall torque and torque off the corners are more important than peak power.
A street car with a closed exhaust system needs something different.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Overlap is a function of the duration and lobe separation of a cams intake and exhaust lobe. It is independent of lift.
*right?*
So if I wanted a large amount of low end torque, quite broad range, I would be better off with say, a comp 262, rather than a 268 advanced 4 degrees say?
And finally, keeping on the subject of the thread, A larger LSA would give a flatter, longer, more broad torque curve right? (and better idle characteristics?)
oh, and what's SR?
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
SR=Solid roller
A larger LSA does exactly what you said.
And yes a 262 would produce more low end then a 268 adv 4*. Mainly because it would not bleed off as much intake charge.
A larger LSA does exactly what you said.
And yes a 262 would produce more low end then a 268 adv 4*. Mainly because it would not bleed off as much intake charge.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Originally posted by ME Leigh
SR=Solid roller
SR=Solid roller
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 PM
TX-SleeperC5
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Sep 24, 2015 03:13 PM









