Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Stroker cranks

Old Sep 12, 2005 | 11:11 AM
  #1  
WoostahGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Car: 1990 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Stroker cranks

I was looking at sbc cranks on ebay today, and found a 4.100" stroke one with the smaller 350 journals. With my calculations, it should produce a displacement of just shy of 412 ci with no overbore.

My question is, has anyone heard of a setup with a this type of crank? It seems to good to be true, and I bet finding pistons would be almost impossible, but if anyone has any input that would be greatly appreciated, as it sounds pretty damn cool.

Oh, I also see that 3.875" (396 ci) cranks are also quite popular. If anyone knows about these bigger inch cranks and what it takes to install them, I would greatly appreciate it.

Last edited by WoostahGTA; Sep 12, 2005 at 11:14 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #2  
shaggy56's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
Yeah but will it fit. I dont know what the max stroke is for a stock block Im thinking 3.75. Im pretty sure you would need an aftermarket cast block to get those large strokes to work. Maybe someone will know more.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #3  
84z28350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 4
From: Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH-350C
Axle/Gears: 3.43
You might be able to clearance a stock 350 block enough to get it to fit but im not 100% sure, ill leave it up to the big cube small block guys to confirm.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 12:40 PM
  #4  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Could you find a piston with a wrist pin that high?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #5  
shaggy56's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
Wouldnt cam to rod clearance be a major factor?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #6  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Clearance of any kind would be a major factor. That kind of stroke would be best left to an aftermarket tall-deck block with increased cam to crank centerline distance.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #7  
spedrace35's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque / Las Cruces, New Mexico
Car: 91 camaro z28
Engine: 6.3L, heads, headers, cam,.....
Transmission: 700-R4 w/shift kit and 3-4 WOT kit
Axle/Gears: 4.11
I don’t know all that much about this subject but I know that people in the past have had problems with clearance between the rods and the cam with a 383 build. I mean wouldn’t the crank of a stroke of 4.01 have less space between rod and cam than a crank of a stroke of 3.75? Once again I do not know if this is correct and I could be wrong and if I am can someone please correct me.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 01:52 PM
  #8  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
A crank with a stroke that large will have less clearance everywhere. No one spot is any more or less critical than anywhere else.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 07:01 PM
  #9  
WoostahGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Car: 1990 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
I'm impressed by the number of replies in such a short period of time, I like this board.

I called a machine shop earlier today and the guy working there said that the newer stroker cranks have been revised and clearance issues are no longer a problem. This is kind of hard for me to believe, but then again I don't own a machine shop.

Again, if anyone can verify whether it is reasonable to fit a crank with a stroke longer then 3.75" it would be greatly appreciated.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #10  
Irockz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Springfield,Mo
Car: 87 Berlinetta,work in progress
Engine: 468 BB,still in the build process
Transmission: TH350,3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 9" Ford,learning how to live under
I don't see how clearence issues can suddenly not be a problem.It's still a big stroke in a block that was never intended for more than a 3.48" stroke.
The question I have to ask you,is why would you spend that kinda dough on a crank,rods,custom pistons,etc.,and still be strapped with a 4" bore?If you were to do this,you'd need an aftermarket block with the raised cam journals,period.
I had a 421 in my car about 3 years ago,(3.85 stroke)and It was a clearance nightmare.I can't possibly imagine squeezing any more stroke into a stock smallblock.So if you've gotta go with an aftermarket block,why not go great big?You could build around 440 cubes out of a Dart or World block with a 4.10 stroke,maybe even a bit bigger.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Falcon50
DFI and ECM
81
Aug 22, 2020 03:26 PM
RS Reaper
Electronics
4
Oct 17, 2018 07:52 PM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 PM
Badass355ciz28
Power Adders
4
Sep 28, 2015 08:31 PM
JSDaddy189
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
4
Sep 26, 2015 03:50 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.