500 HP 383.....Should i use a catalytic conveter?
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Near Milwaukee, WI
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 383 Fuel Injected
Transmission: Pro-Street 700-R4 by Pro-built
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt w/posi
500 HP 383.....Should i use a catalytic conveter?
I am building a close to 500 HP Super-Rammed 383 for my 89 GTA. I am wondering if a catalytic converter would be bad idea for this car. I know it is not a big deal when the motor is putting out 250 HP, but im putting out close to double that. My goal is to keep everything on the car that it came stock with, or replace it with a better part. For example, I still have A.I.R., EGR, A/C, but obviously i replaced my engine and transmission with higher performance internal pieces.
I want to keep the catalytic converter, but i think it would be way too restrictive. My exhaust set up includes SLP 1 3/4 headers with A.I.R., the y-pipe that comes with them, mandrel-bent 3 inch pipe to a flowmaster 80 series with dual 2 1/2 inch pipe out the back.
What do you guys think? I know that companies like Catco make "high flow cats", but high flow is relative.
I want to keep the catalytic converter, but i think it would be way too restrictive. My exhaust set up includes SLP 1 3/4 headers with A.I.R., the y-pipe that comes with them, mandrel-bent 3 inch pipe to a flowmaster 80 series with dual 2 1/2 inch pipe out the back.
What do you guys think? I know that companies like Catco make "high flow cats", but high flow is relative.
Last edited by pellmanm; Oct 16, 2005 at 07:38 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
If your not subject to emmisions, then dont run it. Id say two 3" cats wouldnt be restrictive, but youll need to make sure the engine is rich enough to shut down the cats at WOT or theyll melt in a hurry. Also, a hot cam could potentially dump alot of air and fuel into the cats at low RPM operation, shortening their lifespan.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 966
Likes: 2
From: NE Ohio
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: 305 (LG4)
Transmission: THM700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, 3.23 non-LS
Originally posted by dimented24x7
If your not subject to emmisions, then dont run it.
If your not subject to emmisions, then dont run it.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
While good dual cats wont be a restriction, you have to be careful with them. Performance air/fuel ratios dont work well with cats. All the extra fuel mixed in with the residual oxygen will cause long term damage and possibly immediate destruction. Id defiatly prefer not to have it. You can run leaner, make more power, and not have to worry about reducing 150-300+ dollars worth of ceramic and precious metals to molten scrap. I have one with my 3" system. Its nice having the car run oderlessly and have clean emmisions, but I hate having to watch over it to prevent damage.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
[Sold] Dual cat y pipe
Eric-86sc
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 22, 2015 08:25 PM





