Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Dumb connecting rod question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 10:15 PM
  #1  
vorgath's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1
Dumb connecting rod question

In a LO3, why can't one use 6.0 rods or longer with the stock pistons (for the stock 5.7 rods) ?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #2  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You can, just gotta move the head out of the way.

There's only so much space from the crank centerline to the top of the deck/head mounting surface. Add in 1/2 the stroke, rod length, piston height... better be close to that number and not much over it or the cylinder head and bolts are going to be unhappy with your bottom end and fight back.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:14 PM
  #3  
vorgath's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1
So it's an "alignment" thing ? Just trying to picture it
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:17 PM
  #4  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
It's not an alignment thing, it's a physical impossibility thing. If you make the rod 0.3" longer, the piston has to move up in the bore by the same mount. Since there's only about .025" between the top of the piston and the deck surface on an unmolested block, the pistons would be sticking up about .275" above the deck.

If you want to use a rod .3" longer than the stock 5.7", you need to use a piston that has its wrist pin .3" higher than stock.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:27 PM
  #5  
vorgath's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1
OK yeah I didn't have the actual figures in my head. I just thought hey longer rod, would result in higher compression.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 11:35 PM
  #6  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
It would, if you had some kind of hugenormous combustion chamber that would let you bring the pistons up that high without hitting the heads.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 12:24 AM
  #7  
Stekman's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
The day where combustion chambers are measured in cubic inches....
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 12:38 AM
  #8  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
My combustion chambers are 4.4 cubic inches, what are yours?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BRoss99
Electronics
28
Aug 10, 2025 05:08 PM
Reborn756
Tech / General Engine
142
Sep 4, 2015 03:42 AM
NinjaNife
Tech / General Engine
27
Aug 23, 2015 11:49 AM
theurge
TPI
7
Aug 21, 2015 12:46 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.