305 getting bad mpg, questions
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: NEPA
Car: '87 Camaro irocz
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 limited-slip
305 getting bad mpg, questions
ok i have an '86 firebird with a 305 and it is getting about 8-10 mpg. i am not too sure but i think it should get better than this. it idles high from a cold start at about 1200 rpms and then 700 rpms once warm. that seems good. one thing i noticed is that when i go to fill er up, i take the gas cap off and its like opening a bottle of soda. like too much built up pressure or something. maybe i need a new gas cap for starters? ive checked and could not locate any fuel leakage anywhere. also, i am getting much worse mpg on the highway than city which is odd. once i hit speeds of about 60 i swear that needle is ready to take the plunge. trust me too, i am babying this thing big time. so what are the things that might cause this?
thx
Rob
thx
Rob
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
I can think of about 20 things right off the top of my head that could kill you MPG that bad. Any other conditions or running problems?
Re: 305 getting bad mpg, questions
Originally posted by 86birdman220
when i go to fill er up, i take the gas cap off and its like opening a bottle of soda. like too much built up pressure or something. maybe i need a new gas cap for starters?
thx
Rob
when i go to fill er up, i take the gas cap off and its like opening a bottle of soda. like too much built up pressure or something. maybe i need a new gas cap for starters?
thx
Rob
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: NEPA
Car: '87 Camaro irocz
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 limited-slip
Car runs really well, nothing noticeably strange other than the "87-up" in my gas tank lol. im just looking for pretty general suggestions as i am pretty new to tinkering with cars. so some basic things to check would be good. i tell you what though, the guy i got the car from told me hes got it built up to almost 350ish quality. but still would 10 mpg be reasonable?
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by 86birdman220
i tell you what though, the guy i got the car from told me hes got it built up to almost 350ish quality. but still would 10 mpg be reasonable?
i tell you what though, the guy i got the car from told me hes got it built up to almost 350ish quality. but still would 10 mpg be reasonable?
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,916
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
I'm going to go out and a limb, and guess that this is a carbed car (LG4); since that somewhat critical piece of info isn't included.
Most common cause of unusually high fuel consumption in those, is the plugs in the bottom of the fuel bowl of the carb, that are put there to cover up passages that were drilled during manufacture, leaking. This leak will also cause a VERY RICH idle; where the exhaust smells real fat and smoky when idling, maybe has that burn-the-eyes funk to it. The excessive gas consumption occurs during idling, as well as when cruising or whatever.
Take off the carb. Remove the 2 long screws that hold the air horn (top piece) on, at the very rear of the carb, just inside of the round gasket surface for the air cleaner. Turn it upside down and remove the 3 screws in the bottom that hold the throttle plate (bottom piece) on. Remove the throttle plate.
Toward the front of the bottom surface of the fuel bowl, with the carb upside-down, you will see 2 "tower" looking things sticking out. Each of those has 2 holes, each of which has a plug spun into it. The bottom of the plugs is exposed to manifold vacuum, and the top of them is in the bottom of the fuel bowl. If the plugs don't seal, the engine literally sucks the gasoline right out of the fuel bowl around the lugs.
The plugs are made of a different metal from the carb; and they enjoy the usual dissimialr-metal electrolysis effect, where the 2 metals set up a little battery between them, and one of them erodes. It always happens to these, sooner or later.
The cure is to clean them up as clean as you can get them. Wire-brush the whole surface area around them until you can see bright shiny clean new metal everywhere. Clean the area off with spray can carb cleaner or lacquer thinner or something; and epoxy over them with JB Weld or Devcon epoxy, use the type that has steel filler in it. Let the carb sit overnight for the epoxy to harden; then put it all back together EXACTLY like it was, and re-install it.
If the carb hasn't been rebuilt recently, you might want to get a carb kit, and do that while you've got it off.
This should help dramatically.
I hope this is more useful than reports of the gas mileage that somebody's somebody's VAN gets. That sort of drivel isn't very helpful TO YOU, fixing YOUR car.
Most common cause of unusually high fuel consumption in those, is the plugs in the bottom of the fuel bowl of the carb, that are put there to cover up passages that were drilled during manufacture, leaking. This leak will also cause a VERY RICH idle; where the exhaust smells real fat and smoky when idling, maybe has that burn-the-eyes funk to it. The excessive gas consumption occurs during idling, as well as when cruising or whatever.
Take off the carb. Remove the 2 long screws that hold the air horn (top piece) on, at the very rear of the carb, just inside of the round gasket surface for the air cleaner. Turn it upside down and remove the 3 screws in the bottom that hold the throttle plate (bottom piece) on. Remove the throttle plate.
Toward the front of the bottom surface of the fuel bowl, with the carb upside-down, you will see 2 "tower" looking things sticking out. Each of those has 2 holes, each of which has a plug spun into it. The bottom of the plugs is exposed to manifold vacuum, and the top of them is in the bottom of the fuel bowl. If the plugs don't seal, the engine literally sucks the gasoline right out of the fuel bowl around the lugs.
The plugs are made of a different metal from the carb; and they enjoy the usual dissimialr-metal electrolysis effect, where the 2 metals set up a little battery between them, and one of them erodes. It always happens to these, sooner or later.
The cure is to clean them up as clean as you can get them. Wire-brush the whole surface area around them until you can see bright shiny clean new metal everywhere. Clean the area off with spray can carb cleaner or lacquer thinner or something; and epoxy over them with JB Weld or Devcon epoxy, use the type that has steel filler in it. Let the carb sit overnight for the epoxy to harden; then put it all back together EXACTLY like it was, and re-install it.
If the carb hasn't been rebuilt recently, you might want to get a carb kit, and do that while you've got it off.
This should help dramatically.
I hope this is more useful than reports of the gas mileage that somebody's somebody's VAN gets. That sort of drivel isn't very helpful TO YOU, fixing YOUR car.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
if the 305 has been souped up, and runs pretty fast, and you're getting 10mpg in town, driving it hard, in the winter, I can't see anything wrong here.
another thing you assumed sofa, is that it still has the q-jet. Does it? I mean, if the previous owner did hop up the motor, chances are good theres a holly double pumper on the engine. That'll help kill mileage too.
the top arrows are the well plugs, if you have a q-jet.
another thing you assumed sofa, is that it still has the q-jet. Does it? I mean, if the previous owner did hop up the motor, chances are good theres a holly double pumper on the engine. That'll help kill mileage too.
the top arrows are the well plugs, if you have a q-jet.
Last edited by Sonix; Feb 8, 2006 at 11:44 AM.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: NEPA
Car: '87 Camaro irocz
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 limited-slip
it has:
holley 750 cfm carb with electric choke
edelbrock rpm intake
edelbrock rpm cam
this is what i have been told is in it that is not stock.
holley 750 cfm carb with electric choke
edelbrock rpm intake
edelbrock rpm cam
this is what i have been told is in it that is not stock.
Last edited by 86birdman220; Feb 8, 2006 at 08:14 PM.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Well the pieces to the puzzle are falling into place pointing to the MPG problem.
That RPM cam is old technology and IMHO a poor economy choice.
The 750 Holley is TOO much as well.
Engine TUNE will affect MPG more than most people would imagine.
That RPM cam is old technology and IMHO a poor economy choice.
The 750 Holley is TOO much as well.
Engine TUNE will affect MPG more than most people would imagine.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by sofakingdom
I hope this is more useful than reports of the gas mileage that somebody's somebody's VAN gets. That sort of drivel isn't very helpful TO YOU, fixing YOUR car.
I hope this is more useful than reports of the gas mileage that somebody's somebody's VAN gets. That sort of drivel isn't very helpful TO YOU, fixing YOUR car.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,916
Likes: 2,448
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Fast355: That's what he asked; nothing about "normal", nothing about your van, not even anything about what his gas mileage "should" or "could" be. I think he had already figured out that his gas mileage is not "normal", and doesn't need to hear about somebody's van to learn that, and wants to know what he can do about HIS gas mileage, not hear about yours.
Excuse the digression please. Now back to the actual matter at hand.
Ah, a few minor details like ..... telling us what cam and carb it has, can make a difference. What you'd do to a stock setup, might have nothing whatsoever to do with a mystery modded one.
There are few cams that could possibly be any worse than that one, for the application at hand. You should seriously consider ditching that and putting something more appropriate to whatever kind of driving YOU do, in it.
What gear and converter does this car have? What exhaust is on it? (need to know what every piece is, from the heads to the back bumper; at least, what pipe size)
Has the distributor been replaced with a non-computer-controlled one? If not, that's THE VERY FIRST THING you should do. That will probably also make it run cooler.
The carb is indeed "too big", by the usual measures of what's "enough"; but it should still be possible to get it to work reasonably well. However, NO carb will work right on a motor that's either built out of severely mis-matched parts, or that's mis-matched to the CAR it's in (converter, weight, gears). But it sounds like there's lots and lots of things you can do that are a whole lot more important right now than swapping carbs, and will give you more bang for the buck in dealing with your situation.
Before choosing a better cam, or even trying to decide what parts need to go and which should stay, a COMPLETE list of all the mods to this car, or at least all you know of, would be highly useful. A good place to start would be to make sure it's really a 305. Get the block casting number, conveniently located on the top of the bell housing flange right behind the driver's side head. If you can determine what pistons are in it, specifically whether flat-tops or dished, that would be good to know.
Head casting numbers would be the next critical piece of info, after the short block is identified. Hopefully the PO didn't do something boneheaded and put large-chamber 350 heads, like 882s or something, on it. If he did, the motor's compression is going to be down in the toilet somewhere, and no amount of stuff you can do to it from outside, will ever get it to really run good.
Start there, with figuring out what all you've got.
so what are the things that might cause this?
Excuse the digression please. Now back to the actual matter at hand.
Ah, a few minor details like ..... telling us what cam and carb it has, can make a difference. What you'd do to a stock setup, might have nothing whatsoever to do with a mystery modded one.
There are few cams that could possibly be any worse than that one, for the application at hand. You should seriously consider ditching that and putting something more appropriate to whatever kind of driving YOU do, in it.
What gear and converter does this car have? What exhaust is on it? (need to know what every piece is, from the heads to the back bumper; at least, what pipe size)
Has the distributor been replaced with a non-computer-controlled one? If not, that's THE VERY FIRST THING you should do. That will probably also make it run cooler.
The carb is indeed "too big", by the usual measures of what's "enough"; but it should still be possible to get it to work reasonably well. However, NO carb will work right on a motor that's either built out of severely mis-matched parts, or that's mis-matched to the CAR it's in (converter, weight, gears). But it sounds like there's lots and lots of things you can do that are a whole lot more important right now than swapping carbs, and will give you more bang for the buck in dealing with your situation.
Before choosing a better cam, or even trying to decide what parts need to go and which should stay, a COMPLETE list of all the mods to this car, or at least all you know of, would be highly useful. A good place to start would be to make sure it's really a 305. Get the block casting number, conveniently located on the top of the bell housing flange right behind the driver's side head. If you can determine what pistons are in it, specifically whether flat-tops or dished, that would be good to know.
Head casting numbers would be the next critical piece of info, after the short block is identified. Hopefully the PO didn't do something boneheaded and put large-chamber 350 heads, like 882s or something, on it. If he did, the motor's compression is going to be down in the toilet somewhere, and no amount of stuff you can do to it from outside, will ever get it to really run good.
Start there, with figuring out what all you've got.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: 305 getting bad mpg, questions
Originally posted by 86birdman220
ok i have an '86 firebird with a 305 and it is getting about 8-10 mpg. i am not too sure but i think it should get better than this.
ok i have an '86 firebird with a 305 and it is getting about 8-10 mpg. i am not too sure but i think it should get better than this.
Originally posted by 86birdman220
almost 350ish quality. but still would 10 mpg be reasonable?
almost 350ish quality. but still would 10 mpg be reasonable?
Originally posted by Fast355
I can think of about 20 things right off the top of my head that could kill you MPG that bad. Any other conditions or running problems?
I can think of about 20 things right off the top of my head that could kill you MPG that bad. Any other conditions or running problems?
I then went to say that 10 MPG is NOT NORMAL.
Now for example this would be the recipe to 10 MPG on a 305 F-body.
a.)Big poorly matched cam (too much overlap)
b.)76 cc combustion chambers
c.)highway gears (with a big cam)
d.)stock torque converter(with a big cam)
e.)front-end out of alignment
f.)dragging brakes
g.)float level too high
h.)improperly adjusted timing
i.)sticking centrifical advance mechinism
j.)improperly connected or malfunctioning vacuum advance
k.)carb not calibrated properly
l.)engine oil too thick
m.)thermostat too low temp
n.)lacks heated air cleaner
o.)no PCV valve (this will throw off a carb calibration more than you think)
p.)vacuum leaks
q.)fuel leaks
r.)improperly functioning EVAP system
s.)NO EGR
t.)too much carb
u.)engine needs tune-up
v.)slipping transmission
w.)TCC not functioning (350-C, 700r4)
x.)tire size
y.)weather
z.)fuel quality
Last edited by Fast355; Feb 9, 2006 at 12:21 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
IMHO, with a motor built like that, city mileage of those #'s is pretty close. Maybe a tad low, but maybe you're rounding in your #'s when checking your mileage say.
There are ways to optimize it, to get better mileage and performance, as sofa has mentioned. Detailed specs would give us ways to give you better advice.
but hey, who was right with the holley carb eh? huh?
definately check the distributor first, that's the easiest thing to check, and if it's mismatched by a dumb previous owner, then you'll suffer. If it has a vacuum can on the dist, then you're fine, if it's got a 4 wire plug on the base part of it, and no vacuum can, you're in trouble.
There are ways to optimize it, to get better mileage and performance, as sofa has mentioned. Detailed specs would give us ways to give you better advice.
but hey, who was right with the holley carb eh? huh?
definately check the distributor first, that's the easiest thing to check, and if it's mismatched by a dumb previous owner, then you'll suffer. If it has a vacuum can on the dist, then you're fine, if it's got a 4 wire plug on the base part of it, and no vacuum can, you're in trouble.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: NEPA
Car: '87 Camaro irocz
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 limited-slip
a couple more things about the car... the distributer is good, the motor has 307 heads, the exhaust is strange and not even legal.... it has headers with a catalytic converter but nothing else, somekind of dynomax muffler with dual exhaust. this car has no computer and some things have been removed from under the hood such as the a/c. most of the dash is not functional, instead there is one of those aftermarket tachs. there is also definately an alignment problem... the front end is tilted to one side. also, when driving i can feel EVERY little bump...HARD. hard like im suprised the windows make it home in one piece. maybe a strut is no good.
well here are some pictures of the car.
notice the slight lean to the left

well here are some pictures of the car.
notice the slight lean to the left

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
307 heads (the person that did that should be shot), RPM cam, bad alignment - small wonder it gets poor gas mileage.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by five7kid
307 heads (the person that did that should be shot), RPM cam, bad alignment - small wonder it gets poor gas mileage.
307 heads (the person that did that should be shot), RPM cam, bad alignment - small wonder it gets poor gas mileage.
Not to mention the distributer is more than likely timed by ear.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by Fast355
I can think of about 20 things right off the top of my head that could kill you MPG that bad.
I can think of about 20 things right off the top of my head that could kill you MPG that bad.
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 5
From: MA, USA
Car: 83 bird
Engine: 305/383
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by 86birdman220
a couple more things about the car... the distributer is good, the motor has 307 heads, the exhaust is strange and not even legal.... it has headers with a catalytic converter but nothing else, somekind of dynomax muffler with dual exhaust. this car has no computer and some things have been removed from under the hood such as the a/c. most of the dash is not functional, instead there is one of those aftermarket tachs. there is also definately an alignment problem... the front end is tilted to one side. also, when driving i can feel EVERY little bump...HARD. hard like im suprised the windows make it home in one piece. maybe a strut is no good.
well here are some pictures of the car.
notice the slight lean to the left
a couple more things about the car... the distributer is good, the motor has 307 heads, the exhaust is strange and not even legal.... it has headers with a catalytic converter but nothing else, somekind of dynomax muffler with dual exhaust. this car has no computer and some things have been removed from under the hood such as the a/c. most of the dash is not functional, instead there is one of those aftermarket tachs. there is also definately an alignment problem... the front end is tilted to one side. also, when driving i can feel EVERY little bump...HARD. hard like im suprised the windows make it home in one piece. maybe a strut is no good.
well here are some pictures of the car.
notice the slight lean to the left
If it's leaning and you feel every bump hard, sounds like a broken strut. Does it knock when you go over bumps?
You say it has headers and a cat and nothing else, but it has a muffler? Sounds like full exhaust to me! Unless you mean it doesn't come out the back.
Nothing working on the dash means someone just ripped everything out of the engine compartment without knowing what they were doing. Not ALL wires are bad in there.
Car looks neat though, very unique. It has tons of potential!
On a side note, my 67 Riviera with a built up 430ci got 8mpg
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 814
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
Absolutely. A 750 CFM carb is way too much for a 305. That cam is old tech and not very good. Those 307 heads should be melted-down for scrap. Get yourself a 4150 series Holley 600 cfm carb, 650 cfm at the biggest. Demon makes a good 600-ish street carb as well. Don't get a double-pumper unless you have a stick and lower rear end gears. If you have an auto, get electric choke and vacuum secondaries. Get yourself a set of heads off an LB9, clean them up, port them a bit and do a nice valve job on them. Call Comp Cams, tell them what you have and get them to recommend a XE series dual-pattern cam. Get one of their roller chain drives while you're at it. Make sure all the smog crap is hooked up and working.
My IROC has an LB9 305 and I get about 25 mpg on the highway. In town it's a lot worse, depending on how heavy my foot is, but to get it into single digit mileage, I have to be driving VERY aggressively.
My IROC has an LB9 305 and I get about 25 mpg on the highway. In town it's a lot worse, depending on how heavy my foot is, but to get it into single digit mileage, I have to be driving VERY aggressively.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,425
Likes: 497
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
I would actually get a pair of the 601 305 HO heads. They have a different chamber configuration(like a smaller version of the old and horded corvette 492s) that is only 52 CCs, flow better than the 081s or 416s in stock form. A comp cam XE 256/262/268 will work well with that combo and decent springs. A tweaked Q-Jet will adjust itself all the way out to 750 CFM, but never overcarb the engine which is a good plus. The tiny primaries will give you excellent fuel mileage when you stay out of the monster secondary side.
Last edited by Fast355; Feb 18, 2006 at 09:49 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










