Best Stock 305 Cam
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
TGO welcomes you!
There is no such thing as a "best cam". No two people want the same thing out of a motor. Cam selection must be based on engine set-up, power goals, and supporting mods. Before you decide on cams you need to think about what you want to do with the car and what you want out of the motor. When you have a good idea of what you want it will be easier to suggest parts that will get you there.
There is no such thing as a "best cam". No two people want the same thing out of a motor. Cam selection must be based on engine set-up, power goals, and supporting mods. Before you decide on cams you need to think about what you want to do with the car and what you want out of the motor. When you have a good idea of what you want it will be easier to suggest parts that will get you there.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
you won't get the lt-1 cam to work in your pre-87 non roller block, so go ahead and count that out.
if your looking for cheap power upgrades, then check out the summit brand cams. cam and lifters for $67.99 + $9 handeling fee.
specs on the cam i would suggest: 214/224 .442/.465
if your looking for cheap power upgrades, then check out the summit brand cams. cam and lifters for $67.99 + $9 handeling fee.
specs on the cam i would suggest: 214/224 .442/.465
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,408
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
I would suggest the old L82 350 cam. 224/224 @ .050, .450/.461, 115* lobe seperation on a 112* intake centerline.
This is the cam that chevy should have put in the HO 305s along with ported 601 heads and tubular exhaust manifolds. 9.7:1 compression, around 260 Net FWHP @ 5,000 and 320 ft/lbs @ 3,800. It would have conquered the Mustangs of the time.
This is the cam that chevy should have put in the HO 305s along with ported 601 heads and tubular exhaust manifolds. 9.7:1 compression, around 260 Net FWHP @ 5,000 and 320 ft/lbs @ 3,800. It would have conquered the Mustangs of the time.
Last edited by Fast355; Feb 26, 2006 at 10:30 PM.
Thanks for the replies guys! I am going to use it for my short track motor (1/4 dirt). We are restricted by the rules to only use OEM camshafts so I am limited, that is why I trying to find the "best" camshaft that chevy made that will fit the pre-86 305......
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,408
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Anything in the rules that say it has to be hydraulic? I am thinking the old solid lifter 370 hp 350 corvette cam.
Originally posted by Fast355
Anything in the rules that say it has to be hydraulic? I am thinking the old solid lifter 370 hp 350 corvette cam.
Anything in the rules that say it has to be hydraulic? I am thinking the old solid lifter 370 hp 350 corvette cam.
Trending Topics
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 814
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
LOL, yeah, if the only rule is you have to use a Chevy factory cam, you can run an old firstgen 302 Z28 solid cam. Idle will be crappy.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,882
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
The one to use is 3849346. It's the optional solid for the 302 and 350 Z28 & Vette motors from 69 to 71 (including the LT1). It's 246° @ .050", .485" lift. You can get a copy of it from a number of the major cam mfrs; I know for a fact Comp sells it, and I'm pretty sure Crane does too.
Don't bother with any of the hydraulic ones; they all suck. Some however are far worse than others. Above all, DO NOT use the "375 HP 327" cam, 3863151.
There is no problem with putting a solid lifter cam in a roller block.
If you have to use a cam that's OEM for the car, which of course is a WHOLE DIFFERENT THING from just "OEM" period, use the L69 cam.
You'll like that big solid, if you have enough gear. If people are talking about using that, and it's legal, then that's the one to use; you will surely get beat if you use anything else. Especially if any head mods are allowed in your class (porting).
What are the rest of the rules? Carb? tires? gears? etc.
Don't bother with any of the hydraulic ones; they all suck. Some however are far worse than others. Above all, DO NOT use the "375 HP 327" cam, 3863151.
There is no problem with putting a solid lifter cam in a roller block.
If you have to use a cam that's OEM for the car, which of course is a WHOLE DIFFERENT THING from just "OEM" period, use the L69 cam.
You'll like that big solid, if you have enough gear. If people are talking about using that, and it's legal, then that's the one to use; you will surely get beat if you use anything else. Especially if any head mods are allowed in your class (porting).
What are the rest of the rules? Carb? tires? gears? etc.
Ok...I read the rules and it states that you must use a hydraulic roller or flat tappet lifter.....sounds like no solid cam for us.....we are going to use a 350cfm carburetor and we can not do much to the heads (no porting, grinding or polishing). They want to keep us stock to keep the price down......
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 814
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
Well if you have to use a factory hyd roller, the LB9 cam isn't too bad.
What about that old 350hp 327 cam?
Do you have to use factory rockers? If not you can go with a 1.6 set and get a little more lift.
What about that old 350hp 327 cam?
Do you have to use factory rockers? If not you can go with a 1.6 set and get a little more lift.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,882
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
What about that old 350hp 327 cam?
Above all, DO NOT use the "375 HP 327" cam, 3863151
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,882
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
292/292, 222/222, .447"/.447" :barf: If you see those numbers, RUN AWAY!!!!
Sometimes it's published with different "advertised" durations; and sometimes as 221/221 @ .050" instead of 222/222.
Sometimes it's published with different "advertised" durations; and sometimes as 221/221 @ .050" instead of 222/222.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
hydraulic roller or flat tappet lifter
no touching the heads at all? not allowed to backcut the valves? (not even a little bit ?
) Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,408
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
No head modifications allowed? Get a pair of 601 heads. They flow better stock and have smaller combustion chambers than other 305 heads.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, near columbus
Car: 89 iroc-z
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: wc-t5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi (4 now)
Originally posted by sofakingdom
292/292, 222/222, .447"/.447" :barf: If you see those numbers, RUN AWAY!!!!
Sometimes it's published with different "advertised" durations; and sometimes as 221/221 @ .050" instead of 222/222.
292/292, 222/222, .447"/.447" :barf: If you see those numbers, RUN AWAY!!!!
Sometimes it's published with different "advertised" durations; and sometimes as 221/221 @ .050" instead of 222/222.
considering there are those of us running 180 duration cams with 380 rocker lift from factory than thing is a monster as compared to something like my 305 roller cam in the l03.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,408
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by flaming-ford
Not seeing the horribleness of those specs..... Liite high duration for that light imo but, other than that it's not horrible.
considering there are those of us running 180 duration cams with 380 rocker lift from factory than thing is a monster as compared to something like my 305 roller cam in the l03.
Not seeing the horribleness of those specs..... Liite high duration for that light imo but, other than that it's not horrible.
considering there are those of us running 180 duration cams with 380 rocker lift from factory than thing is a monster as compared to something like my 305 roller cam in the l03.
I would take the solid lifter corvette cam or the L82 cam anyday over that slug.
Originally posted by purplez86
and we can not do much to the heads (no porting, grinding or polishing)
and we can not do much to the heads (no porting, grinding or polishing)
Or I could give you a few pointers on some things to do if money is an issue
In classes like this I think one of Smokey Yunick quotes best sums it up "There are only 2 types of racers....Cheaters and Losers"
technically the best "305 cam" im gonna say is the 83 to 86 305HO cam and the 85tpi cam. if you got lift rules at your dirt track, i would go to crowers website. they have a slew of circle track cams designed exactly for your application. those crower cams give good mid range and top end but have low lift numbers to keep the tech inspectors happy. check them out if you wish
Wow, my head is spinning now...all these numbers, all these choices, lol! So it sounds like I have some choices out there on what I want to run, just I have to make the right one.....that is racing I guess....On the heads, I am surpose to use 305 castings, I think you were referring to 601 castings correct?...sorry I am a newbie to this whole motor thing so I am learning as I go....I really appreciate everyones help on here....and yes I would love to get that information and those pointers you mentioned.
Ok, guys, I can't decide....what one should I buy?
Ok, guys, I can't decide....what one should I buy?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Originally posted by V6camaroman
technically the best "305 cam" im gonna say is the 83 to 86 305HO cam and the 85tpi cam. if you got lift rules at your dirt track, i would go to crowers website. they have a slew of circle track cams designed exactly for your application. those crower cams give good mid range and top end but have low lift numbers to keep the tech inspectors happy. check them out if you wish
technically the best "305 cam" im gonna say is the 83 to 86 305HO cam and the 85tpi cam. if you got lift rules at your dirt track, i would go to crowers website. they have a slew of circle track cams designed exactly for your application. those crower cams give good mid range and top end but have low lift numbers to keep the tech inspectors happy. check them out if you wish
nope sorry. But the best cam offered in the thirdgens was the 1989 L-98/LB9 (5 speed only ) cam .
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Except that's a roller lifter cam, and he needs a flat tappet cam.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,882
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
The cam profile itself is actually virtually identical, between the L69 cam and the L98/better LB9 cam. They are essentially the same cam except for the mechanism of cam/lifter contact.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Originally posted by five7kid
Except that's a roller lifter cam, and he needs a flat tappet cam.
Except that's a roller lifter cam, and he needs a flat tappet cam.
Ahhhh I see , I figured he just wanted to know regardless of roller or not
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Original post: "I am looking for the best chevy (OEM) cam to use in a '84-85 305." Therefore, flat-tappet.
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 814
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
Originally posted by five7kid
Original post: "I am looking for the best chevy (OEM) cam to use in a '84-85 305." Therefore, flat-tappet.
Original post: "I am looking for the best chevy (OEM) cam to use in a '84-85 305." Therefore, flat-tappet.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Except later he said, "I read the rules and it states that you must use a hydraulic roller or flat tappet lifter..."
As in, "hydraulic, either roller or flat tappet". Since he's using the older block, he can't use a retrofit roller cam or lifters.
I think. . .
(Does make your head spin, huh? Those rules-restricted classes can get nasty with the details.)
As in, "hydraulic, either roller or flat tappet". Since he's using the older block, he can't use a retrofit roller cam or lifters.
I think. . .

(Does make your head spin, huh? Those rules-restricted classes can get nasty with the details.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










