Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Installed New Vacume Advance Dist???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 08:05 AM
  #1  
85_Z28_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Installed New Vacume Advance Dist???

What should i set the timing at with my new dist.
Base without vacume hose, and advance with vacume hose connected. Thanks... Neal
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #2  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Beats me, what engine is below it?

That text in your personal info to describe your car can be helpful ya know.

10* is a good shot in the dark though.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 02:22 PM
  #3  
85_Z28_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Ok i am set to 10* with the vacume hose disconected. It really made a big difference with the take off from a dead stop. Also new plug wires. Now all i need is a non cc Carb. Any suggestion??? Thanks Neal
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 03:42 PM
  #4  
85z28guy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Alliston,Ontario
Car: 85' Z28
Engine: 383 roller
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.70
Pick a holley vac secondary in your preferred cfm rating. TONS of knowledgeable people out there, and even more parts available for them.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 06:03 PM
  #5  
ZZ28ZZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 3
From: Austin
Car: 82 Z-28
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
If you like tinkering with the carb all the time, go with the Holley.
If you want to install a carb and not have to mess with it regularly, get a Quadrajet.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 07:45 PM
  #6  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally posted by ZZ28ZZ
If you like tinkering with the carb all the time, go with the Holley.
Sorry, but that's

They aren't any different than any other carb.

Except the CC carb, of course, which should be considered the preferred carb for a street performance application. One exception would be a manual transmission application, in which case the vacuum secondary Holley, q-jet, and Edelbrock Performer should all be considered as inferior to a Holley/Demon mechanical secondary double pumper.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:56 AM
  #7  
ZZ28ZZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 3
From: Austin
Car: 82 Z-28
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
They aren't any different than any other carb.
I disagree.
When was the last time you saw a Quadrajet with a warped metering block, blown power valve, or leaking fuel x-fer tube?

I don't want to get into a big Holley vs Q-jet debate, but,,
generally speaking, Holleys are high maint; Q-jets are low maint.
I know plenty of old timers that agree with me on that.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
black84z28-4spd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
my holley has been great...there is a reason you see them on the fast cars
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #9  
85z28guy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Alliston,Ontario
Car: 85' Z28
Engine: 383 roller
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.70
I love when people say you need to constantly adjust your holley, so its a pos. You should be regualrly checking everything on your motor, if you find that taking 5 minutes once a month to "tinker" with your carb is too much, maybe you need a new hobby.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #10  
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Wow lotsa BS floating around here.

A vacuum secondary carb is not "inferior" to a DP carb.
Different design only. Much superior in most street driven environments especially with auto trans and a stock or near stock stall torque converter. and gives up nothing in performance on a race car **with proper tuning**.
Check under the hood of a NHRA/IHRA "stock" or "super stock" Chevy the next time you're at the drags and walking around the pits. It will be a Qjet or a vacuum sec Holley. Then check the et and MPH that it runs in the quarter mile. Can your car run that fast? Its all in the tuning.

As you buy a carburator it comes with a "out of the box" inital setup of jets, rods, accelorator pump squirters and cams and a inital setup of the secondary opening rate on a vacuum sec carb or one with an air door like a Qjet.

YOU NEEED TO FINE TUNE it from that point. The sec ondary opening charactoristics are fully adjustable and modifyable to suite any car using simple parts, modicfications and some patience and a day or 2 at the local drag strip to dial it in.

Stating a false blanket statement as DP carbs are somehow superior to vac sec carbs is very misleading and in most street driven applications, totally wrong.
Ya just havent bothered to properly tune a vacuum sec carb yet. or a Qjet or a Edelbrock/Carter AFB carb.

A good replacement for a CC qjet on a relitivly stock motor using the stock GM intake manifold would be an older Non CC qjet. these are usually much cheaper to buy as a replacement at your local autoparts store.
You can get jets, rods and other interal parts to fine tune it from Edelbrock.
The old pre 1974 Qjets are very simple to work on but not a dir4ect replacement for your later carb. A Qjet for say a 1969 chevelle 350ci V8 is aobut as cheap a Qjet replacement as you'll get.

You can more finely set your engines ignition timing by getting a "advance timing light" and setting the "total timing at high rpm (32-36deg) and then checking and adjusting the vacuum advance timing at differnt cruise manifold vacuum settings.
You can also do this with a conventional timing light by adding a Mr gasket Timing tape to your engines harmonic balancer so you can observe the full advance timing while at high rpm.

Generaly for a mild engine (near stock) 8 to 12 deg initial timing at idle.

32-36 total mechanical advance at high rpm and up to 51 deg total combined timing ( mechanical and vacuum combined) at high vacuum cruise (hiway speed) works well.

12deg initial +24deg mechanical advance =36deg
total mechanical advance.

15deg of vacuum advance at high vacuum (hiway) cruise added in =51deg

A more radical high performacne motor with a long duration camshaft that has a rough idle and low manifold vacuum needs a different advance curve. Needs much more initial timng at idle 16 to 28 but the same34-36deg total mechanical and about the same amount of additional vacuum advance during high vacuum part throttle cruise (15deg) {total up to 51deg}
The exact amount of cruise vacuum advacnc your motor needs all depends. experimentation finds the right amount. The motor will surge and or ping at cruise speed if there is too much timing.
On a very radical motor with a race cam the distributor is usually modified to lock out the mechanical advance to get 36 at idle and 36 total. A race motor can still use vacuum advance for part throttle cruising so there is really no need to ever remove the vacuum advance on any street driven car. Just a matter of dialing it in properly.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #11  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Originally posted by F-BIRD'88


Stating a false blanket statement as DP carbs are somehow superior to vac sec carbs is very misleading and in most street driven applications, totally wrong.
Ya just havent bothered to properly tune a vacuum sec carb yet. or a Qjet or a Edelbrock/Carter AFB carb.
Why does everyone have to be like that?

Thats no where near wrong. In fact five7 hit it right on the head. You will go slower with a vac secondary carb on a manual trans car most of the time. All of the time probably.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #12  
85_Z28_305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Thanks for the great info. I will look for a non cc Qjet replacement,
and will play around with the timing to see what works best.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #13  
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Originally posted by ljnowell
Why does everyone have to be like that?

Thats no where near wrong. In fact five7 hit it right on the head. You will go slower with a vac secondary carb on a manual trans car most of the time. All of the time probably.
A vac carb only requires a slightly different driving techneique during the shifts between gears on a man trans RACE car.

in fact if you were to employ this same tecnique with a DP carb car you go better too.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 07:57 PM
  #14  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Originally posted by F-BIRD'88
A vac carb only requires a slightly different driving techneique during the shifts between gears on a man trans RACE car.

in fact if you were to employ this same tecnique with a DP carb car you go better too.
Technique or no, DP is better for a manual trans performance car.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Amillionoh7
Suspension and Chassis
24
May 24, 2020 08:01 AM
apo_bailon15
TBI
4
Mar 28, 2016 05:20 AM
red90IROCls1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
10
Aug 25, 2015 06:56 AM
db057
Tech / General Engine
4
Aug 22, 2015 08:17 PM
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM.