Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

benifits of 194 valve in 305

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2006, 08:53 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
jamon8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 GTA "Cocaine"
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
benifits of 194 valve in 305

I am putting flattops on a balanced assembly. my heads are mildly ported 081 305 heads with upgraded springs to handle comp cams 08-302-8

gross lift 480 in/ex
264/274 duration
210/220 .05
112 lobe sep

I have headers and 3in, ported manifold and plenum, 21 lbs inj and afpr.

do you guys think it will make a big difference if I went to a 194 valve vs a 184(stock)

thank you

Last edited by jamon8; 05-06-2006 at 08:59 PM.
Old 05-06-2006, 09:06 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
michal_larson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with that camshaft the 1.94's will help
----------
i also have a set of 081's im going to put on my car, but the 1.84" swirl heads mine came with are suprising me with how the engine runs , but im using a HUGE camshaft though

Last edited by michal_larson; 05-06-2006 at 09:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 05-06-2006, 09:19 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
I think it'll help.
I think f-bird could give you a #, cfm, if you were looking for that.

I went with 1.94 in my 416 heads, FWIW.
Old 05-06-2006, 09:34 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 428 Likes on 368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
I had the 1.94s cut down to 1.90" and used 1.55" exhaust valves in my 081 buildup.
Old 05-07-2006, 07:26 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
jamon8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 GTA "Cocaine"
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
fast 355 I do not understand! you had 194's in your 081's that did not come stock and had them reduced to 190's to put bigger exaust valves in.

let me know the logic behind that move. I am not trying to be a smart @%^ but I am curious
Old 05-07-2006, 11:39 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,111
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
do you guys think it will make a big difference if I went to a 194 valve vs a 184(stock)

Yes you'll gain about 7-10 cfm on a stock port, or one with light porting and as much as 20cfm on a full port job. For a 305 motor I wuld stay with the 1.50" exhaust or do like 355 did and get 1.55" exhaust valves. So a 1.94x 1.55" combo would work well for you. I go with 1.94x 1.60 for 305 heads that will end up on 350's. After deshrouding the chamber around the larger valves and then doing a clean up cut (.005 to .010") on the decks, the last set I did cc'd @ 61cc's (58 stock) So for a 305 to restore the stock chamber size just shave them some more. 2.02's on a 4" bore are possible but hardly needed and I feel they weaken the casting because of the excessive deshrouding nessessary to so a flow gain over 1.94" valves.

I get high 230 to low 240cfm with 1.94" valves with good low/mid flow too.
The exhaust really comes up when done right, to around 170 180cfm from 110-130stock depending on the casting.

Usually the stock valves are finished and need replacement so jumping up in valve size is a no net cost gain.
Attached Thumbnails benifits of 194 valve in 305-photo_0010cc.jpg  
Old 05-07-2006, 04:36 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,119
Received 428 Likes on 368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
No need to apologize, I should have stated what I had done better. I bought a set of 1.94 valves. I then cut them down to 1.90". I then installed them in the heads that had the seats cut to 1.90" as well. This allowed me to fit in a 1.55" GM exhaust valve by cutting that seat to 1.55" as well. Neither valve was shrouded in the stock 305 chamber too much. I did do some unshrouding work on the intake and raised the CC to around 61-63cc. I then angle milled the heads down giving 57-58cc in each chamber (would not recomeend it due to the crazy thin decks of the 081s). Mine were flowing very similarly to F-BIRD'88s.


Stock 187 chamber with 1.84" and 1.5" valves, the 081 is virtually identical. Notice how close the intake valve is to the chamber?


Stock 193 chamber with 1.94" and 1.5" valves, the 083 is virtually identical and the proportions are nearly identical to the 305 heads. The intake valve is pretty shrouded in stock form.
Notice the spacing between the intake valve and the chamber is much bigger now. This shot is during port/chamber work.
Attached Thumbnails benifits of 194 valve in 305-634172_58_full.jpg   benifits of 194 valve in 305-634172_42.jpg  

Last edited by Fast355; 05-07-2006 at 04:46 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gta90
TPI
40
09-15-2015 04:00 PM
Bubbajones_ya
TBI
2
08-28-2015 02:17 AM
mustangman65_79
Tech / General Engine
4
08-08-2015 01:18 AM



Quick Reply: benifits of 194 valve in 305



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.