stock 083 heads with 2.02/1.6 valves?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 306
Likes: 3
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: SuperRam 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
stock 083 heads with 2.02/1.6 valves?
I have the factory 083 heads with a simple gasket matching on the intake side. Will upgrading the valves to 2.02/1.6 make any noticable difference. I don't have any porting experience and I don't want to ruin the so that's wht only a gasket matching was performed. So, will the larger valves alone help??
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The greatest gains are realized by cleaning up the bowl area (the port right under the valve) and short side radius. Gasket matching doesn't help nearly as much.
Unless the bowl and short side radius are cleaned up, larger valves aren't going the help much at all.
Unless the bowl and short side radius are cleaned up, larger valves aren't going the help much at all.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 306
Likes: 3
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: SuperRam 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
But what if only the valves were changed? Will I see a difference? How much extra cfm would the heads improve? I will try porting but I have to finnd an extra set of heads first. THanks!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
only putting in the big valves would probably hurt flow actually.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
If you just cut for the valves you will create alot of shrouding and you will have a very noticeable ridge going into the ports that will create alot of turbulance when they cut for the larger valves.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
'zactly.
Picture a 1.94" valve getting 100% of flow around the circumference. Then put in a larger valve, now it's "closed" on the side of the wall, so you get a larger circumference, but 40% is blocked by the wall = net loss.
That's an exaggeration, but that's how it can work.
I wouldn't be too caught up in valve size, that's what the folks used to brag about in the '60s with old "double hump" heads and whatnot. Now it's more about the bowl area, and the angles on the back of the valves. Back cut, radius/chamfer front face, etc.
Picture a 1.94" valve getting 100% of flow around the circumference. Then put in a larger valve, now it's "closed" on the side of the wall, so you get a larger circumference, but 40% is blocked by the wall = net loss.
That's an exaggeration, but that's how it can work.
I wouldn't be too caught up in valve size, that's what the folks used to brag about in the '60s with old "double hump" heads and whatnot. Now it's more about the bowl area, and the angles on the back of the valves. Back cut, radius/chamfer front face, etc.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
I agree the stock valve size can be made to be very efficient with some cleaup work. Look at this thread and you can see how far he got with the stock valve diameter. Check out his flow numbers in part 3 since those have the stock valves with the 3 angle valve job. He doesnt even cut for larger valves til part 4 and states this requires alot more work.
Here is a comparison between the 1.94 valves and the 2.02. He even states by working on the short side radius he could have gained even more flow to get it up to 100%.
1.94 1.5 valves flow
.1 63.8 41.4
.2 120.6 88.2
.3 178.9 124.1
.4 215.2 154.3
.5 240.1 171.8
.6 241 180
2.02 1.6 valves
1 72.4 47.6
.2 135.1 101.0
.3 201.3 140.2
.4 237.8 171.1
.5 264.6 187.6
.6 266.1 192.6
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tpi/...d-project.html
Here is a comparison between the 1.94 valves and the 2.02. He even states by working on the short side radius he could have gained even more flow to get it up to 100%.
1.94 1.5 valves flow
.1 63.8 41.4
.2 120.6 88.2
.3 178.9 124.1
.4 215.2 154.3
.5 240.1 171.8
.6 241 180
2.02 1.6 valves
1 72.4 47.6
.2 135.1 101.0
.3 201.3 140.2
.4 237.8 171.1
.5 264.6 187.6
.6 266.1 192.6
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tpi/...d-project.html
Last edited by shaggy56; Aug 6, 2006 at 01:11 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





I'll see if I can find an extra set and start grinding. 
