Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

High quench unfortunately

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 12:24 AM
  #1  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
High quench unfortunately

I am building a 383 stroker.
I bought the short block used(less than 1000 miles)(1974 block)
The pistons are speedpro flattop forged with valve reliefs(3.4 cc)
The piston is down 0.035 from the deck.
Isn't this a big number?
I measured this today. I used a Snap-on straight edge and a feeler gauge.

I WAS going to use a 0.040 head gasket but with a 0.075 quench and 10.7 compression,(going with AFR 195 with 65cc) aren't I asking for trouble ?

What is the smallest gasket I can use?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 07:58 AM
  #2  
Viprklr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
The smallest gasket i've "found" is .015 compressed thickness. That's what i'm using.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #3  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'd verify that dimension, either its not right or something is amiss with the parts. The pistons shouldnt be that far down.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #4  
Viprklr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
You have a point there. My slugs were only .024 in the hole. .015 gasket gave me .039 quench.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 09:06 AM
  #5  
Dialed_In's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 3
From: MD
Car: '88 IROC-Z medium orange metallic
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
I didn't deck the block I raced last year and the pistons were in the hole .031". I used a Fel Pro MLS .015" gasket. I'm sure I gave something up, but it ran pretty good
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #6  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
I used a Fel Pro MLS .015" gasket
What is the part # for that?

Even if I went with the .015 hg and .035 down the hole, would I still have detonation with a 0.050 quench??
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 11:55 AM
  #7  
Viprklr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
The gasket I used was Fel-Pro 1094.

I'm not 100% sure on all the pros/cons of quench but one of the issues is the better the quench the better efficiency. I'm sure somehow this works into detonation.
I believe a stock gasket compresses to .039. Add that to my .024 slugs gives me a stock .063 quench. I didn't have detonation issues.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #8  
V8Rumble's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: 39.84N 105.11W
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
The info below reflects the best knowledge I have right now, but it'd also be a real good idea to call a couple of machine shops, & see what they have to say...

I've been researching this a bit for my own 383 build, & the number that I've run across as the "ideal" is .040". If it's greater than that, you're giving up some efficiency, if it's tighter than that, you need to pay real close attention to your clearances, esp. the P/V clearance.

Based on this, I'd say that "Dialed_In's" assembly was pretty close to being "dialed in" as was the .039" that Viprklr reported.

If LB9GTA were to use that .015" gasket, he'd wind up at .050", which isn't ideal, but from what I understand, really wouldn't be horrible either. Another thing to keep in mind is that a 10.7:1 CR with AFR (alum.) heads is roughly equivalent to a 9.7:1 CR with iron heads - which I don't feel is especially dangerous, personally. As long as normal attention is paid to the type of fuel used & how the timing is set up, I'd guess that the setup described should be good for thousands of miles...

Of course, you could always pull the short-block apart, deck the block .010" & reassemble everything for that "perfect" .040", but I don't think it'd be worth it to me...

(Depends on what the goals are for this engine - street/strip car, circle-track car, dragster, ??? If you're in a really competitive class that only allows limited mods, then it may be worth it to try to get every single advantage you can...)

Good luck!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #9  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
Well, I'll pose this question.

Which compression ratio would everyone pick with this engine?
383 stroker
AFR 195 eliminators 65cc
flat top forged pistons

Option #1
Compression of 11.37-1.0 with a quench of 0.050

Option #2
Compression of 10.7-1.0 with a quench of 0.075

On desktop dyno, I would benefit about 10hp more at 5500rpm with option #1
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #10  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Desktop Dyno assumes you can time it without detonation.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #11  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
Barring any hp gain, which compression/quench combo would you pick?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #12  
V8Rumble's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: 39.84N 105.11W
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
Talk about a "lesser of two evils" scenario... Ugh!

Myself, for a street car, I'd tend to go for the lower CR (option 2). Option 1 would mean that you'd have to hope that you never bought gas that had been diluted, or came from a bad batch..

The extra "10 HP" wouldn't be worth it to me, it's just too close to the edge...
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #13  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
I use 91 octane gas all the time, would that be enough to save me from pinging?

At the track I use 94 octane.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 01:37 PM
  #14  
Viprklr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,462
Likes: 4
From: N. Illinois
Car: 92 GTA/ 00 TA
Engine: 383/350
Transmission: 700R4/T-56
I'd also personally not shoot any higher than 11.0:1. Personal preference unless you really like riding that fine line.
I can't say how my 10.25:1 quench .039 runs yet as it's still waiting for assembly. BUT at the same compression and my stock quench of .063 I had no detonation whatsoever on even 89 octane. I never went below that.
Ideally if you have someone around you with a laptop and datalogging software you can physically watch your knock counts to see where you're at.
[B]Chances[B] are, you should be fine as long as your car is in good tune and your timing is correct.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #15  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Yea, that piston depth in the hole is pretty normal for an undecked block and speed-pro pistons.

I think .050" is a tad high, but you'd still see the benefits of the quench effect. But at 11:1 you're too high. .070 is flat out terrible, and with 10.7:1 CR that's too much.

I think the 1 point of compression between aluminum and iron is a bit optimistic.

My opinion? You're between a rock and a hard place. Maybe port open the chambers on the heads until you're at the right zone.
Verify the 3.7cc on the pistons, I thought they're usually 5cc.

Is this still going to be port injection? That gives a bit more leeway on high CR due to good fuel mixing. Ditto with knock sensors.
I'd keep a low t-stat in, and set your electric fans to keep it cool. I'd also polish the combustion chamber, and polish the piston tops, and maybe coat the valves. Polish everything you can. Remove sharp edges from the head surface - chamber area. I think these things I mentioned can keep you safe at around 10.5 and a decent quench, you're still too high where you are now.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 08:07 PM
  #16  
327???'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
i have been told countless times that it will be more detonation resistant with a better squish and higher compression then with a wider squish and lower compression, but i have no proof, thats just what i was told.

i think LT1's had compression around 11:1 stock.

i ran 10.3:1 on my iron headed 327 with no major detonation issues on 89 and none on 92, the squish was around .060 FWIW.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 11:48 PM
  #17  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
Since I have not used my heads yet(64cc), I might be able to return them and get a set of AFR 195's with 74cc chambers. That way I can still have a quench of 0.050(0.035 piston down the hole and 0.015 hg)
With that head, I would be at 10.3 compression.
Would that be better??
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #18  
V8Rumble's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: 39.84N 105.11W
Car: '89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: WAS 350 - now L92 (alum. 378/6.2L)
Transmission: WAS 700R4, now a built T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
IMHO, heck yeah, that'd be a lot better option for where you're at right now. I REALLY wouldn't want to try to "open up" (or enlarge) the combustion chambers on a new set of AFR heads, there's just no way that you're going to make the chamber design any better, & every chance in the world to make it worse.

If you can get the bigger chambers without a lot of grief, I'm thinking that doing so may be a good solution for you.

Again, just MHO...
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #19  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,416
Likes: 493
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
FWIW, I put Dart Iron Eagle 180s with 49cc chambers on an otherwise stock L05 shortblock in my 1994 G10 Van. With the 49cc chambers, pistons at the stock .025" in the hole, and a .016" embrossed shim head gasket, I was at 10.5:1. I ran it with a production LT4 cam which gave me cranking compression readings of 220 psi. With the TBI setup in control and my tuning, it ran perfectly fine on 89 octane with no knock counts and 30* total timing. Made 300 RWHP through a 700r4, stock converter, and 8.5" 10 bolt with 3.42 gears.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #20  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
I just used another compression calculator and noticed the 2 were different.

Here is my specs
speedpro flattops http://store.summitracing.com/partde...0&autoview=sku
65 cc chambers
0.035 piston down the hole on one side(0.030 on the other side)
0.015 head gasket
4.060 head gasket bore
3.75 stroke and 4.03 bore

So what is my compression?
Is it 11.4 or 10.9??
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:14 AM
  #21  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
It's 10.9. You forgot to include the volume of the valve reliefs when you got 11.4.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:20 AM
  #22  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
Thanks Apeiron !

So that's better, right?
So a 10.9 compression and 0.050 quench.

I can use a snap-on scan tool and check for knock counts so I might have to not run as much timing.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:22 AM
  #23  
327???'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Car: '82 Sport Coupe/'89 bird/'77 280z
Engine: 355/2.8/L28E(t)
Transmission: TH350/T5/4 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.73/3.42/3.54
head gasket bores are generally like 4.155, might bring it down another .1. i think your fine at 10.9ish
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:28 AM
  #24  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
This one is 4.10
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...4&autoview=sku
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 12:32 AM
  #25  
wanta427's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 87
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: 350 L98 al head Stealth Ram
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1 brakes
I would be tempted to deck the block so you can use good head gaskets . Most of the really thin gaskets aren't recommended for use with Al heads . I don't know how thick the MLS gaskets are . I'm using a .028 Victor graphite gasket that's just for Al heads with the pistons .012 down . On my 355 it computes out to 10.49cr .
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 04:17 AM
  #26  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
I'd return the heads and get the 74cc variant. I wasn't thinking when I mentioned open them up, I wouldn't want to touch a die grinder to AFR heads - that's sacriledge

I haven't asked yet, but what cam are you going to use? I really think DCR is most important, but assuming you're running a "planet earth" camshaft - I stand by my previous advice.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #27  
rgarcia63's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 4
From: Houston, Texas
Car: 88' IROCZ
Engine: 388 TPI Motown 350 Race block
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
My SCR is 10.2:1 and the pistons range from 2 to 5 thousandths in the hole, the gasket is .041 for alum heads for a quench of .043 to .046, I run on Regular.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #28  
LB9GTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 50
From: Manitoba
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 421sbc
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" with 3.89
The cam I will be running is the 280xfi(hy flat tappet). Down the road I will switch to a hy roller.
I will be using a LT1 converted intake too.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sp8ty
South East Region
5
Sep 24, 2018 03:55 PM
sp8ty
Exterior Parts Wanted
3
Oct 23, 2015 08:35 AM
oil pan 4
Fabrication
2
Oct 6, 2015 11:56 AM
Spyder_TheGamer
V6
5
Oct 2, 2015 12:25 PM
Zell1luk
TPI
0
Sep 29, 2015 10:36 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.