Economical driving with a vacuum gauge
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 1989 305 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 10 bolt
Economical driving with a vacuum gauge
Hi all,
It's pretty well accepted that the greater vacuum reading you can get while cruising around the better your economy will be. But I'm wondering if there are other factors to consider.
For example in my car if I'm doing 40MPH in 3rd, I'll pull 20 inches of vacuum. But if I change into 4th (700R4), RPM will drop about 200RPM and vacuum will drop down to 16 or 17 inches. If I were to force the car to drive around in 2nd gear I can pull roughly 22 or 23 inches of vacuum at the same speed.
Obviously, revving the car to get the vacuum up isn't going to be the best way to get economy. So, is there a rule of thumb that can be applied when deciding what gear to use vs vacuum?
I guess doing some consistent driving and watching how much fuel is used would be a good start, but my fuel sender in the tank pack up a while ago so I wouldn't have a clue.
It's pretty well accepted that the greater vacuum reading you can get while cruising around the better your economy will be. But I'm wondering if there are other factors to consider.
For example in my car if I'm doing 40MPH in 3rd, I'll pull 20 inches of vacuum. But if I change into 4th (700R4), RPM will drop about 200RPM and vacuum will drop down to 16 or 17 inches. If I were to force the car to drive around in 2nd gear I can pull roughly 22 or 23 inches of vacuum at the same speed.
Obviously, revving the car to get the vacuum up isn't going to be the best way to get economy. So, is there a rule of thumb that can be applied when deciding what gear to use vs vacuum?
I guess doing some consistent driving and watching how much fuel is used would be a good start, but my fuel sender in the tank pack up a while ago so I wouldn't have a clue.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Re: Economical driving with a vacuum gauge
I had a vacuum guage in my truck and attempted to drive with the vacuum as high as possible in the highest gear possible to see the difference in fuel consumption. Around town keeping the vacuum up with a feather touch on the gas and pissing off other traffic my fuel economy went down from 14 to 12-13. Thats driving as light as possible. On the highway in 3rd (3 speed) with a 3.42 ratio rear I went from 17 to 24 MPG on a 120 mile round trip but I was a pain in the **** to drive like that. It has been proven that keeping your 700R4 in 3rd around town below 45 MPG does help reduce fuel consumption because it's not bogged down as much and keeping it from shifting up and down saves fuel.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
High vacuum means lower relative load. Mixture ratio is leaned under those conditions. But that doesn't tell you how much fuel is being used. A fuel meter would be the right way to know whether a lower gear with higher vacuum or higher gear with lower vacuum is using more or less gas.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 1989 305 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 10 bolt
Re: Economical driving with a vacuum gauge
I had a vacuum guage in my truck and attempted to drive with the vacuum as high as possible in the highest gear possible to see the difference in fuel consumption. Around town keeping the vacuum up with a feather touch on the gas and pissing off other traffic my fuel economy went down from 14 to 12-13. Thats driving as light as possible. On the highway in 3rd (3 speed) with a 3.42 ratio rear I went from 17 to 24 MPG on a 120 mile round trip but I was a pain in the **** to drive like that. It has been proven that keeping your 700R4 in 3rd around town below 45 MPG does help reduce fuel consumption because it's not bogged down as much and keeping it from shifting up and down saves fuel.
Can you point me in the direction of how driving in 3rd below 45MPH reduces fuel consumption? I'm curious about it.
----------
High vacuum means lower relative load. Mixture ratio is leaned under those conditions. But that doesn't tell you how much fuel is being used. A fuel meter would be the right way to know whether a lower gear with higher vacuum or higher gear with lower vacuum is using more or less gas.
Last edited by blackbeauty; Mar 5, 2008 at 05:43 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Economical driving with a vacuum gauge
Fuel flow meters are connected in the fuel line(s), and they measure the rate of fuel consumption directly.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 1989 305 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 10 bolt
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM






