Shedding Rotational Mass
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 24
From: Dumfries, VA
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 334 Stroker Superram 222/230
Transmission: Full Manual 700R4 / 3k Street Edge
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Eaton, Moser, Richmond & More
Shedding Rotational Mass
So far in my car, I've swapped to an SFI chromemoly flexplate. Not sure what, if anything this did. But I plan on swapping to aluminum drums which I've read is worth about 10lbs. i also want to swap in an aluminum driveshaft which is another 4. Eventually, I want to ditch my 12" converter for a 10" which is worth another 6 - 8lbs if i remember correctly.
Can anyone else think of any other ways to reduce rotational mass? And what kind of difference can I expect from all this?
Can anyone else think of any other ways to reduce rotational mass? And what kind of difference can I expect from all this?
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 18
From: Lincolnton, NC
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 97 5.7 Vortec LT4 hotcam
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Shedding Rotational Mass
There are more ways, but they start to drastically decrease reliability. Gun drilled axles, light weight gear sets, etc.
Also, when time comes for the motor to be rebuilt, a lightweight crank makes a difference.
Some people might say harmonic balancer. However, a well built harmonic balancer that dampens crank harmonics is better then some cheapo light weight unit.
Oh and are you already running lighter weight wheels?
Also, when time comes for the motor to be rebuilt, a lightweight crank makes a difference.
Some people might say harmonic balancer. However, a well built harmonic balancer that dampens crank harmonics is better then some cheapo light weight unit.
Oh and are you already running lighter weight wheels?
Last edited by 3rdgenmaro; Mar 18, 2010 at 08:19 AM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 24
From: Dumfries, VA
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 334 Stroker Superram 222/230
Transmission: Full Manual 700R4 / 3k Street Edge
Axle/Gears: 3.90 Eaton, Moser, Richmond & More
Re: Shedding Rotational Mass
There are more ways, but they start to drastically decrease reliability. Gun drilled axles, light weight gear sets, etc.
Also, when time comes for the motor to be rebuilt, a lightweight crank makes a difference.
Some people might say harmonic balancer. However, a well built harmonic balancer that dampens crank harmonics is better then some cheapo light weight unit.
Oh and are you already running lighter weight wheels?
Also, when time comes for the motor to be rebuilt, a lightweight crank makes a difference.
Some people might say harmonic balancer. However, a well built harmonic balancer that dampens crank harmonics is better then some cheapo light weight unit.
Oh and are you already running lighter weight wheels?
The motor only has about 10k on it so a rebuild is out for quite some time...
To the best of my knowledge, my rims are stock 15" aluminum ones. Is there anything better than this?
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 18
From: Lincolnton, NC
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 97 5.7 Vortec LT4 hotcam
Transmission: 700 r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Shedding Rotational Mass
Im not exactly sure on the wheels. I know there are lighter ones, but I dont know how much. But then again, not really needed for the street. Strip only car could see some benefit.
Also could look at aluminum pulleys, a/c delete, manual steering, smog delete, etc.
Carbon/aluminum driveshaft. You should see a big improvement when you swap to a smaller converter diameter.
Might want to start watching unsprung mass too. Good benefit there as well.
Also could look at aluminum pulleys, a/c delete, manual steering, smog delete, etc.
Carbon/aluminum driveshaft. You should see a big improvement when you swap to a smaller converter diameter.
Might want to start watching unsprung mass too. Good benefit there as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86White_T/A305
Third Gen Association of Ontario
0
Sep 21, 2015 05:28 PM






