Decisions Decisions
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 753
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, Texas
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28, 1989 TTA #922
Engine: lb9, 3.8L turbo
Transmission: 700r4, 2004R
Decisions Decisions
So guys need some feedback considering between getting a 86 yellow iroc or a 81 turbo trans am pace car?
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 9
From: Northern, CA
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: Decisions Decisions
That not enough information to make a educated choice.
A IROC-Z what ? 305 ? 350? Auto ? Manual ? etc. ,etc.
A IROC-Z what ? 305 ? 350? Auto ? Manual ? etc. ,etc.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 753
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, Texas
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28, 1989 TTA #922
Engine: lb9, 3.8L turbo
Transmission: 700r4, 2004R
Re: Decisions Decisions
its a 86 305 t5 manual trans by what the owner told me
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 4
From: morrow, ga
Car: 82 S10, 83 280ZX, 84 Z28
Engine: 355 smallblocks..na, 2.8 turbo
Transmission: 85:th350, 84:700R4
Axle/Gears: 85:ford9 4.85, 84:stock 3.24
Re: Decisions Decisions
Any car with a turbo gets my vote.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,482
Likes: 9
From: Northern, CA
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Camaro
Engine: TBI,5.0
Transmission: Automatic 700R4
Axle/Gears: Eaton Posi,3.42,LPW Ultimate Cover
Re: Decisions Decisions
Is this the Trans Am your talking about ?
http://www.firebirdgallery.com/Edition_Indy_80lot1.htm
If your going on looks its hard to beat a IROC-Z
http://www.firebirdgallery.com/Edition_Indy_80lot1.htm
If your going on looks its hard to beat a IROC-Z
Last edited by Ron U.S.M.C.; Feb 16, 2013 at 01:25 AM.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,884
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Decisions Decisions
That lame turbo 301 had what... 210 HP? It was pathetic. And since it used a carb, a Q-Jet at that (good carb but not AT ALL conducive to The Force), HIGHLY mod- and tuning-hostile.
People will laugh at it. Did then, hasn't got any better since.
In equal conditions, I'd get the 3rd gen if it was me. Yellow or not.
People will laugh at it. Did then, hasn't got any better since.
In equal conditions, I'd get the 3rd gen if it was me. Yellow or not.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 753
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, Texas
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28, 1989 TTA #922
Engine: lb9, 3.8L turbo
Transmission: 700r4, 2004R
Re: Decisions Decisions
Is this the Trans Am your talking about ?
http://www.firebirdgallery.com/Edition_Indy_80lot1.htm
If your going on looks its hard to beat a IROC-Z
http://www.firebirdgallery.com/Edition_Indy_80lot1.htm
If your going on looks its hard to beat a IROC-Z
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Decisions Decisions
2nd gen turbo ta are lame ducks.
Some collector value perhaps in the future if kept stock.
3rd gen camaro would be a better car to mod or for driver duty imo.
Some collector value perhaps in the future if kept stock.
3rd gen camaro would be a better car to mod or for driver duty imo.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZZ3Astro
Power Adders
1045
Aug 13, 2019 12:57 AM
