Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 11:57 PM
  #1  
John in RI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Community Favorite
iTrader: (170)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,259
Likes: 459
From: RI
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 LS1 Rear End
1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

I'm currently rebuilding a 305 SBC and while digging thru my heads I took a peek at a set of centerbolt heads that I've had in storage. Everything I've ever read or noticed in the past has told me that centerbolt (87 + or Roller Lifter ) engine require Self Aligning Rocker Arms & that Non Self Aligning Rocker Arms were used on all non-roller lifter, perimeter valve cover bolt engines.

I understand that guide plates can be added to centerbolt heads and NSA can then be used..... I'm thinking in terms of a stock engine.

Here's a couple stock rocker arms:


Everyone will notice the non-self aligning rocker at the top and a Self Aligning Rocker at the bottom.

I've got 2 pairs of 081 heads,... I KNOW they were both removed from 87 TPI cars. Why is it that BOTH of these sets of heads have NON Self Aligning Rockers ??






Both sets of 081 heads I've got have been in storage a LONG time. I find it very hard to believe that these rockers were ever swapped in the past. COUld have been swapped - sure,.... but I HIGLY doubt it. Can anyone tell me if they have even seen this before ??






Last edited by John in RI; Oct 3, 2013 at 09:38 AM. Reason: edit
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 01:40 AM
  #2  
novaderrik's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 5
From: Howard Lake, MN
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 355- hopefully a 5.3 this summer
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

they did kind of build them both ways in 87...

i'd use the self aligning rockers- but only if you aren't using guideplates and only if the pushrod holes in the heads aren't slots that act as guides.. you don't want more than one method of lining things up..
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 06:36 AM
  #3  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,867
Likes: 2,429
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

Yup; I've seen the same thing; apparently the transition wasn't all at once...
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 09:37 AM
  #4  
John in RI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Community Favorite
iTrader: (170)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,259
Likes: 459
From: RI
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 LS1 Rear End
Re: 1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

You can Kinda' see the 081 head with a "hole" rather than the slot found on the earlier heads in the pic above. Here is a pic of the "slotted" 416s



What gets me is that EVERYONE says that guide plates MUST be used when NSA rockers are installed on a centerbolt ( roller ) head because at least 1 form of guide is needed. ( I can understnad why 2 guides working together is a BAD thing )

If GM was building roller motors in 87 with NO way to guide the pushrod then why arn't there more complaints about pushrod problems on 87's ?? How bad can it really be to install NSA rockers on a roller head if GM was making them that way ?? Is it possible that they learned there was a problem that year and that's what caused a change in the rocker design ? ( but again - why isn't the NSA rockers in 87 more widely known about - I've NEVER seen it mentioned anywhere before !? )


Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 10:58 AM
  #5  
TreeFiddy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 6
From: Sydney, Australia
Car: '86 TA
Engine: '74 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: 1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

Dunno, the pushrods holes in the 081's are hard to see in that pic, but look like guide slots to me. Shorter than the 416 slots yes, but slots nevertheless. I though SA pushrod holes were quite large to avoid any possible contact.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 07:47 PM
  #6  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,867
Likes: 2,429
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

How bad can it really be to install NSA rockers on a roller head if GM was making them that way ??
Depends on how wide the slot between the "rails" on the rocker is... if there's enough slop in there, they might never even touch.

The "better" the rockers, the more likely they'd be to cause problems, IOW.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 11:37 PM
  #7  
John in RI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Community Favorite
iTrader: (170)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,259
Likes: 459
From: RI
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 LS1 Rear End
Re: 1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

Originally Posted by TreeFiddy
Dunno, the pushrods holes in the 081's are hard to see in that pic, but look like guide slots to me. Shorter than the 416 slots yes, but slots nevertheless. I though SA pushrod holes were quite large to avoid any possible contact.
You might be onto something there.....


Here is the FIRST set of 081's I started messing with. ( These had NSA rockers) Clearly these appear to be "slotted" heads.




This is the second pair of 081's I had (pictured above.) They also had NSA Rockers & the pushrod "area" appears to be rounded when looking from the top - but slotted when viewed from the bottom.



At first glance it almost appears like pushrod wear made them 'rounded' - but the marks are just to prefect and I think it was machined. You can just about make out the counter-sink on each hole in this pic:




I had ALWAYS taken it for granted that the 87+ centerbolt heads required Self Aligning Rockers, But It seems as if the type of pushrod area is the determining factor ( Slots Vs. Holes ? )



Reply
Old Oct 5, 2013 | 02:03 PM
  #8  
paulo57509's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 48
From: Tracy, CA
Car: '87 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: TH700R4
Re: 1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

Very interesting discussion.

I know the engine in my car is the factory installed original. It's a roller cam engine.

The heads are 14101081 centerbolt castings with date codes of J166 and J206. These heads do not have self-aligning rockers. I don't recall what the pushrod holes/slots look like.

I've never actually held a self-aligning rocker arm in my hands, but from the posted photos it appears that the valve stem would need to be a bit longer above the retainer to fit a self-aligning rocker.

What if you have an assembled head without the rocker arms. How would you tell if self-aligning rockers are needed? The pushrod slots? Valve stem lengths?

That one photo looks like the pushrod slots were drilled out using a Louis Tool.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2013 | 03:49 AM
  #9  
TreeFiddy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 6
From: Sydney, Australia
Car: '86 TA
Engine: '74 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: 1987 Rocker Arm Self Align or Non Self Aligning ??

A quick search here turned up this:

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tech...ide-holes.html

First pic is narrow slot to guide the pr for non sa rockers, second pic has round holes to clear the pr for sa rockers (or guide plates).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
TX-SleeperC5
Firebirds for Sale
25
Feb 24, 2016 01:34 PM
New2Chevy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:35 AM
ericjon262
Engine Swap
7
Sep 11, 2015 06:07 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.