Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Factory HP for a SB400??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2002 | 07:19 PM
  #1  
Keith27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
Factory HP for a SB400??

Does anybody know the factory HP for a 1970 Sb400??
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2002 | 07:56 PM
  #2  
jms's Avatar
jms
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 589
Likes: 2
From: Gamaliel, KY USA
The 1970 2 barrel carbed 400 small-block was factory rated at 265 horsepower (4400 rpm) with 400 ft lbs torque (at 2400 rpm) with 9.0:1 compression.

1971 400---255 horsepower (4400 rpm), 390 ft lbs torque (2400 rpm) with 8.5:1 compression.

1972 400---(Ratings method changed to that used today)---170 horsepower (3400 rpm), 325 ft lbs torque (2000 rpm) with 8.5:1 compression ratio.

1973 400---150 horsepower (3200 rpm), 295 ft lbs torque (2000 rpm), 8.5:1 compression ratio.

All according to my 1977 Chiltons Manual.
jms
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2002 | 08:13 PM
  #3  
87transam5.7tpi's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
hey JMS how did the rating change exactly?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2002 | 08:22 PM
  #4  
jms's Avatar
jms
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 589
Likes: 2
From: Gamaliel, KY USA
The factories (around 1972) started rating their engines with the normal accessories versus the earlier method of rating them with no power-draining accessories (such as power steering, air, smog pumps).

Basically the "newer" ratings were closer to actual than the earlier ones.

However, also about this time period, government regulations, concerning smog and lead pollution, were phasing out leaded gas and the factories were lowering compression ratios to try and accomodate unleaded gas.

I was there. Very sad for the new cars but used muscle cars were VERY cheap.

Would you have given $1,500 for a 375 horse-396 1969 SS Camaro?

jms
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2002 | 09:44 PM
  #5  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,262
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Don't forget that back in 1972, minimum wage was also $1.60/hour.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2002 | 09:44 PM
  #6  
SSC's Avatar
SSC
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Originally posted by jms
Would you have given $1,500 for a 375 horse-396 1969 SS Camaro?
jms
Yes, Yes I would have.
SSC
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2002 | 10:33 PM
  #7  
Keith27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
Thankz for the info JMS.
I can get a 400sb longblock from work for 1200.00.
Im plannin on pulling out the 150000 mile LO3 in a few months and im not sure what engine to use yet.
But im for-sure going from TBI to carb.

Thanks again for the info
Peace
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2002 | 10:34 PM
  #8  
jms's Avatar
jms
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 589
Likes: 2
From: Gamaliel, KY USA
LOL on the minimum wage.

I was a sophomore in '72 and working at a Baskin-Robbins in Lawton, Oklahoma.

Going through OLD papers the other day and found a pay-stub showing I was getting $1.00 per hour! Somebody owes me some money!

But, back on the subject. NOBODY pays attention to the stock 400 ratings because they don't stay stock very long.

A little known tip (used when I was dirt-tracking and in a 2-barrel limited class) is the 2-barrel intake off the 400 had bigger passages than the other small-blocks' 2-barrel intakes. As if anyone today would keep the cast-iron 2-barrel intake.
jms
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2002 | 02:12 AM
  #9  
Ions91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
From: Warner Robins, Ga
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
1200.00$ seems a little high, might want to check around first.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2002 | 06:11 AM
  #10  
Pat Hall's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 3
From: Roy,UT USA
All I gotta say about small blocks 400's is AWESOME TORQUE!! I dropped one in a thrashed 77 Camaro with a stock TH350 and 2.73 gears, and I could powerbrake it all the way into drive while standing perfectly still. If you like a torquey motor, you could drag the local church down the road with a healthy 400!
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2002 | 10:33 AM
  #11  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Don't concern yourself with the factory's ratings, they are meaningless at best, and since you'll be throwing away the garbage they put on them for heads and cam and intake, yours will be different (hopefully higher).

The minimum wage thing makes me remember about 73, I was working a construction job making the awesome retainer of $2.47½ / hr., which was more than anybody else I knew. Too bad the project came to an end, and I went to work at Kroger for $1.80

I had a 400 for about a decade in my 83 but pulled it when I moved to CA. Now I'm getting transferred to OH, so back in it goes!!! Much better than what's in the car now (a weenie 305 at 265 HP & 340 ft-lbs according to the chassis dyno).
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2002 | 11:40 AM
  #12  
Keith27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
Ion the 1200.00 INCLUDEZ the core charge. Have you priced longblocks, 1200 aint bad!!
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2002 | 01:31 PM
  #13  
Eighty5TransAm's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Ks
only paid 175 for my 400
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2002 | 03:25 PM
  #14  
GOLD85's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,Manitoba,Canada
paid $200 for mine
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2002 | 08:42 PM
  #15  
Keith27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
I wouldnt put a 200.00 motor in my car!
But Im sure ya'll put out a little more cash to GET it running.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2002 | 10:54 PM
  #16  
87transam5.7tpi's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
I got my 400 block for $50 thats the long block, it needed to be rebuilt(like I wouldn't do that anyway)
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 10:55 AM
  #17  
85transamtpi's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Chitown
I dont know if I would spend 1200 bucks on a 400 longblock, when I can buy a used motor and rebuild for much less money. Then I get to choose the parts I want...and you know what they say "The only way to know something is done right is to do it yourself". When I was at school we got a few "ready to install" longblocks (for instruction purpose), and when we took them apart, we found that they were out of spec in more than one place. Would you put that in your car? Wouldnt you want to save some money anyway?

-peace
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
armybyrd
Carburetors
3
Oct 20, 2015 03:57 AM
Galaxie500XL
Suspension and Chassis
2
Oct 1, 2015 01:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM.